Getting the whole picture is a must!, Solutions can only be in Awareness

If one continues to surf the site below you will find Canada as a trading
Corporation listed with the US security;

This means it is trading as a for profit business, a commercial entity which has no power over private men and women unless they contract with or submit to it

then you will also find "Ontario Province of":


http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?ac...nclude&count=40

"Quebec Province of"

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?ac...nclude&count=40

"British Columbia Province of"

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?ac...mpany&CIK=14306



You will see by the *short list* of documents, if you request them from me at owlmon@gmail.com although voluminous, they
partially indicate the diligense that has been extended to bring as many
private men and women into awareness of our faith as *possible to
avert and abate any possible legal assumption that we are consenting to be responsible for corporate entities subject to corporate
law.* http://www.usavsus.info top right ...Church Deregistration Notice being one.
**
*I have dozens of other communications I can provide to thsoe who may request but suffice to say I think you can
see that if a crime is taking place in public office and if it is not in the knowledge of one involved in the crime that it may absolve him or her from responsibility, take note though that once privately informed and in the awareness of
the crime, those private men and women participating, once privately informed must stop the public criminal action or clear intentional misfeasance of public office
malicious prosecution, bad faith and criminal intent is implied.*

Private liability folows and a private criminal prosecution via a private information**
http://www.qp.gov.sk.ca/documents/eForms/C...m2-Formule2.pdf

White out Saskatchewan and write in approapriate province in upper and lower case.

This link tells you how

http://www.bcrevolution.ca/filing_private_prosecution.htm

This Article by Robert Worthington really sinks it home as to private liability of an offending official.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa39...411/ai_n9467708

A TOPlC RARELY TALKED about in public procurement, or even within
governments generally, is the possibility of a government official abusing
the powers of their office for improper reasons. Given the currency of the
topic, however, in this article we seek to shed some light on what could
become tomorrow's headline, the tort of misfeasance in public office.

In common law, persons who exercise the legal powers of the Crown (called
public officers or public officials) are subject to a tort (civil wrong)
action if they abuse their powers. Called in law misfeasance in a public
office, this tort was first created in England in a case called Ashby v.
White (1703) 92 E.R. 126, where a person, maliciously and fraudulently
deprived of their right to vote by an election official, sued the election
official for damages and won.

The tort came to Canada in a case called Roncarelli v. Duplesis [1959] S.C.R.
121, where the Quebec premier improperly ordered the manager of the Quebec
Liquor Commission to revoke Roncarelli's liquor license because Roncarelli
had provided bail money to several Jehovah's Witnesses whom Duplessis had
had arrested. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) found the premier had no
grounds for ordering this, did not even have the power to make such an
order, and had done so only out of malice.



That malice is being demonstrated by the private men and women acting as
Judges Police and ministers in ignorance of the communications to them.
They have all been served with the private knowledge and had a duty via 180
of the criminal code and as senior officials had a duty to inform others not
to intimidate men and women of faith or sacred Shamanic duty nor obstruct their ability to practice
their faith, practices or sacred Shamanic duties as per 176 and 423 of the code hat applies to them as allegaints of her majesty who si a Christian monarch whose sole power is to Defend the faith.....trouble is no one ever asked so her minions of corruption stained her image by corpoarate plunder.

What follows in this educational set of facts and not opinions is proof of the weak spot of the Canadian government and its house of Cards set of laws regulations and policies exposing the soft underbelly of a grossly bloated and overextended fraud well overdue for a swift demise.

The main strength of that festering fraud is the minds those who have got this far being ready to quit and not finding out the rest as I mentined the Queen and hinted at religion
**
*Minister Donald Christpher Carter has already communicated to Mr. Lufty as
of 2003* as you will see when open his document that was sent registered
mail to over 70 officials in their private capacity.

*It appears we have a deliberate conspiracy taking place*.

*This email will be used as evidense of awareness on the part of senior
staffers of this fraud and criminal activity that is transpiring on the part
of revenue justice and Federal Court judges and clerks alike or anyone who
comes into awareness of a crime and ignores their duty to act.*
**
I am including a set of links and a Video of myself at the end explaining
the situation and educating about creators law his people and what he decreed
happen to those of the other half of the circle who stiff necked refused to follow his law.

An Archist is one who follows mans laws. A deist is one who follows God's
laws. A or An as a prefix to a word such a moral means the opposte or in
the case of Archist an Anarchist ,which means in english opposed to mans
laws, like Yahushua, the hebrew name for Christ, was..

Since you may need to know why i speak of fictions I will refer you to Dueteronomy the great book
of law in chapter 1 verse 17 and chapter 10 verse 17 then I will guide you
to Acts 10:34 and Romans 2:11 then finally and definitively to James 2:9. *I
or our faiths members can not show respect to or be persons!*

I know the meaning of the word per sona is with sound. I also know it
meant and was used to refer to a mask worn by a player in a stage...a
fiction.

I am a man not an individual as both person and individual, as written in
corporate law , refer to corporate members as in a parternership or a
business like commercial relationship.

Matthew 6:24, in the two edged sword of the Bible , says to not partake of mammon which is commerce which is the
corporate dead. We are not to have communion with the dead flesh or formed
dead thing Andrew. God forbids it!. That is the trap right there brothers and sisters
God makes this clear in the action of Saul in bringing up the dead spirit of
Samuel.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_...r=28&version=31


The whole system we fight against is based upon that book Brethren and if you do not know how to turn it upon them they have you all labled as false god worshippers and can quite legitimately and lawfully in their minds enslave you all and have done so!

Please take your time read all of this amazing info below to grasp how powerful it is andwhy Canadian treasury was briefed about this by Cameron McEwen senior
analyst for Treasury who still works there albeit in a reduced capacity..

They agreed with all of the facts as being irrefutable
as of the Queen's letter to them saying she was in reciept of the
petition. This is powerful history and some of you may have prejudices
that may wish to reject this but the facts got treasury to say uncle!!

I in quest of truth have been following the freedom movement since
1999 and have seen some amazing things take place in the battle for
supremacy.

I have met with Norman Yellow Bird of Hobbema and Harvey WhiteHawk of Cote as well as many other originals in Saskatchewan British Columbia Alberta and all who listened agreed the info was powerful and irrefutable but noted the error in the fact that most of the people will not listen to the info I provide below as of brain washing and ego.....and as such a nation of slaves continues......we shall see!

Of all the most influential info I have discovered was the fact that the Queen, head of all the justice systems with the Govenor General as head under her, is sworn to
be defending the laws of God of the King James Bible along with all of her oath swon allegiants.

That along with the fact I show you that the laws of the government
of Canada or the commonweath do not apply to you are quite startling I
hope you will not be blinded or angered by these shockers.. They prove you do
not have to go to defacto courts to have problems solved and you can take affirmative effective action

You can only come out of Babylon and fraud if you are aware.

Now once aware of the following irrefutable facts and you still wish
to submitt to imposters you may wish to question your logic and I submit your sanity.

Blessings.
From Whom Elizabeth Rogers , Bless her eternal spirit , clan Mother of Pasqua first Nation Saskatchewan , was named and adopted as Spotted Eagle in 2005


Slavery , and how to stop theft of original lands , removal of seed and ability to observe creators law and practice your spirit questy unimpeded

Monday June 28, 2004
at 06:58 AM
owlmonone@yahoo.ca or owlmon@gmail.com

What is Slavery??? What is forced taxation??? How can parlimentarians
sworn allegiant to a Christian Monarch, who is defender of the
Christian faith and Biblical law, support gay marriage? What about stealing your land and Children? How about taking away Creators herbs?....... How about making you bow to false
law or god?????

Is this with God's scriptural approval? Will they proceed
to force you to bow to a false god in
court if they know of your faith beforehand??

Will the Queen be
amused???

Did she as a Christian monarch take an oath to defend the laws of God
of the King James Bible?

http://www.oremus.org/liturgy/coronation/cor1953b.html

Was it based upon the words of the 1689 version? Or was it minutely
altered with no legal method to do so?

http://www.worldfreeinternet
.net/parliament/oath.htm< http://www.worldfreeinternet.net/parliament/oath.htm >

http://www.jacobite.ca/documents/16890409.htm


Is their a law regarding that faith and the defense thereof by those
who took an oath to the King's and Queens?
http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.ht...f_of_faith.html
see section 22

This story is proof positive of what i am saying will take place if
you stand in your faith if assauted by unlawful forces!!!

http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/1948.html

This actually happened as I am first hand witness to the events. The
prosecutor backed down immediately!!!! Do not be prejudiced as of
God's gift lest you blaspheme his creation

Can they our so called sworn allegiants to the defender of the faith
really ban the ability to store seed? Our farmers own seed? The
simple answer is yes if we allow it! We allow it by not claiming it
as God's gift!

All herbs bearing seed are a gift of the Creator with no repentance required.
Romans 11:29. How can Creators gift to man and woman be outlawed or
removed from your ability to possess it in those countries that have
Bibles in their courts?

Do we get say about this?

From whence do they get their authority in those countries that
recognise Creator as Supreme? From the Bible if they are dejure. From
thin air if they are de facto!

Who will stand for their faith the way Christ himself showed us?

I will show you how with registered mail to private men and women as
per Matthew 18:15-20 that everything can change in a short time.
Class actions against private men and women in charge of bringing in
Codex ( Law to remove natural supplementys and herbs from the shelves and into doctors presciptions) will wake them up as to their inability to get corporate
defense. They will also be suffering from an inability to get
competent(R. v Mckibbon 1988 Ezekiel 33:6) private defense.

Genesis 1:29 and Romans 11:29 ensures the rule of law is clear!

The King James Bible has Standing in commonwealth courts! That means
it cannot be argued with! They made it that way!!

That link will expose the underbelly of the beast that drives Codex!

Who is responsible for the charging of interest or what God refers to
as usury?? Are we compelled to violate God's command and pay
interest??

http://www.tentmaker.org/lists/UsuryScriptureList.html

http://www.iahushua.com/WOI/conman2.html

Is the world bank owned by ethnic affiliation???

http://www.wealth4freedom.com/Rothschild.html


http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-4....html#rid-71224


Is the Talmud ruling the world and law?

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/index.html

I strongly encourage you to read as much as you can on this site as it
will show you how powerful Talmud is and how to circumvent it's power
over you.It already has invoked taxes upon you and now is pushing for
the Medpharm control of it all with Codex. Yes Talmud was responsible
for all that.

Are you supposed to bow to false authority???
Exodus 20:3-5 God's word is final . Deuteronomy 4:15-19; 5:7-10; 12:2-3

Are you a child of Israel or a slave??

http://mindprod.com/kjv/Leviticus/25.html25:44

Both thy bondmen, and
thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are
round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
25:45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among
you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you,
which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
25:46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after
you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for
ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule
one over another with rigour.


God is telling us if we are strangers to his law and do not follow
after his law as if we fail to follow we will be enslaved.



Have you been bought and sold as a* person*?


This below is touted as a Canadian petroleum and gas producers act.
Your body produces oil and gas. Why is their a listed value to your
life listed there if it is about petroleum ?

Please keep in mind the Canadian treasury Board was briefed on this
and said I was correct.

Notice the buying a selling of persons and the definitions

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/32270.html



control status" means, with respect to a person, whether or not the
person is Canadian controlled as determined under this Act and the
regulations;


"direct equity percentage" �pourcentage de participation directe�

"direct equity percentage" means, with respect to formal equity owned
by a person in any particular person,

(a) where the particular person does not have more than one class of
formal equity within the meaning of the regulations, the percentage of
the formal equity of the particular person that is owned by the person
, and



"owned" �poss�der�

"owned" means, subject to the regulations, beneficially owned, and the
words "owner" and "ownership" have corresponding meanings;


"person" �personne�

*"person" means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a trust, a
government, an agency of government, a segregated fund within the
meaning of the regulations and an organization that is prescribed as
being a person or that falls into a class of organizations prescribed
as being persons;*

*Individual what? Individual fictions?*

*Did you read the word "man" in there?
***
Is their a value to your life?

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-431/71221.html#rid
-71224 <http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-431/71221.html#rid-71224 >

Remember 12.7% a year is what is collected on the annuity of your
bond. *That bond is what gives value to the currency in circulation as
you in a bonded form are used* a*s surety for the* *negotiable instrument
of value*
internationally.

Who or what is a false God ? Exodus 20:3-5

One who writes law in excess of or in derogation to God or acts like a
God overwriting YeHoVaH's law, is a false god. Acts 12:21-23

Deuteronomy 4:2 the eleventh commandment and 12:32 chiming in commands
what to not do with his law.

Does the government of Canada have a legitimate Governor General or an
imposter* that has usuped the power*???? Lets examine that.

http://www.gg.ca/governor_*general*/role_e.asp< http://www.gg.ca/governor_general/role_e.asp>
look for defacto

What does de facto mean??? Why must we know? Ignorance is no excuse
Hosea 4:6 section 19 of mans criminal code!

http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-46/sec19.html

http://www.lawinfo.com/lawdictionary/dict-d.htm
http://www.pixi.com/~kingdom/defacto.html

The creditor for Canada defines defacto

http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...E0?OpenDocument
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...ce?OpenDocument

Can one word like defacto, mean we are under the power of an
illegitimate false god usurped government?? Are we supposed to bow
to their godless commands? What did Shadrack Meshak and Abednigo do
in Daniel Chapter 3? they refused to bow! Did Daniel eat the Kings
food? He refused as of God's food ordinance! Daniel Chapter 1

Why does *Michaelle Jean* say she is de facto??? Is she being
Honest and truthful?

Why does the world bank say de facto means usurped authority and an
abrogated constitution ?

http://wbln0018.worldbank.org /Institutional/Manuals/OpManual.nsf/%200/5CE3BA026987F1C78525672C007D07E0?OpenDocument


Will you bow to a false god regime???? Will you violate God's first
command? Exodus 20:3-5. Have you been royally conned just like
millions before you? 2Peter 2:3

Do the provinces tell Church's if they register they have to give up
God's law? Yes they do!! This is hard to believe but is true
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/e...l_religious< http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/e...l_religious>

See section 6.5

Did you know the word constitutor defined in Blacks law dictionary,
and others as well, means *one who by simple agreement becomes
responsible for anothers debt*?

Did you agree to pay anothers debt? When? How? Whose debt was it? Was
it lawfully obtained?

http://usa-the-republic.com/revenue/Britian-Pontiff.html

Does Canada's parliament makes laws in excess of God's law?

Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32 says no!

They do it Every day they sit!

I still cannot find the Income tax act in the Bible. * Can't find it
in the parliamentary Clerks office nor the Clerk of the Senates
Office. Still looking.
no original posting in the Canada Gazette either!!!*


Ezra 7:23-26 and Numbers 15:15 may help with whose law applies while
were looking!

Do they as lawmakers also make laws that take away from God's law?

Big Drug Case removed the Lord's Day Act

http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/timePortals/mil...nes/116mile.asp

Then their is abortion.....

Are taxes via usury *and *fraud lawful? What does God say?

http://www.reformation.org/moneychangers.html

What did Jesus really mean when he said "render unto Caesar"

http://sw.jeffotto.com/render.htm

Did you know that section 32 of the Canadian supreme law the charter
of rights and freedoms says it only applies to the government and that
it does not apply to private individuals? ?? Mans law does not apply
unless you are government!!

http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pdp -hrp/canada/guide/application_e.cfm
<http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pdp-hrp/canada/guide/application_e.cfm >

Are you defacto government?? Are you an individual?

Are you a Person , *or God's creation of a man or woman . Choose one*.

From the federal court act"

person" ? personne ?

"person" includes ( means *only what is shown*)a tribunal, an unincorporated
association and a partnership.

(personne)

"plaintiff" ? demandeur ?

"plaintiff" includes a person on whose behalf an action is commenced.

(demandeur)

Do you know where the origin of the word person comes from?

Latin. Persona : from greek per=with, sona=sound. A hollow mask worn
by a player on a stage used to reverberate and throw the sound of an
actors voice to the distant audience; a fiction.

Are you a mask? Are you a fiction? Did God create you as man?

What does God have to say about persons? Deuteronomy 1:17; 10:17;Acts
10:34; Romans 2:11; James 2:9 tells us God has no respect for persons
and if we should show respect to persons we commit sin!!

What law applies to those who are not deemed government??

Are you government? Do you fit this definition?

http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/repository/6legisln
/02cc/60211800.html< http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/repos...211800.html>

Numbers 15:15 is the law that applies

Re read the preamble at the beginning of Canada's supreme law ,the
Canadian Constitution, as you are made an offer there. God's rule of
law as supreme!!

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/index.html#charte

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

"Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the
supremacy of God and the rule of law:"

Will you accept the offerOr the other offer of mans law below
it......You know sections 1-52

This next, is Canada's master enactment for commerce.

The Canadian BIll of Exchange act, mans law ,only applys to government
and says in section 55 that if you were under intimidation as in
threat and duress


Holder in Due Course


Holder in due course

55. (1) A holder in due course is a holder who has taken a bill,
complete and regular on the face of it, under the following
conditions, namely,

(a) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without
notice that it had been previously dishonoured, if such was the fact;
and

( that he took the bill in good faith and for value, and that at the
time the bill was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in
the title of the person who negotiated it.


Title defective

(2) In particular, the title of a person who negotiates a bill is
defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the bill, or
the acceptance thereof, by fraud, duress or force and fear, or other
unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates
it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a
fraud. ( altering your name on any bill without your permission for a
financial purpose is fraud. You simply were never taught to
caplitalize your name nor reverse it and no law of grammer or man
allows it!

They cannot proceed against God's creation as of their oath to the
Queen so they proceed against a fiction hoping you will volunteer
yourself by accepting the name change without a quibble.) Tacit
consent is nihil dicit he says nothing and is consenting.

Look at your drivers license! Everything the government sends is a
bill of exchange!

R.S., c. B-5, s. 56.


Right of subsequent holder

56. A holder, whether for value or not, who derives his title to a
bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to
any fraud or illegality affecting it , has all the rights of that
holder in due course as regards the acceptor and all parties to the
bill prior to that holder.

R.S., c. B-5, s. 57.


Presumption of value

57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party
thereto for value.


Presumed holder in due course

(2) Every holder of a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, deemed to be a holder in due course, but if, in an action on
a bill, it is admitted or proved that the acceptance, issue or
subsequent negotiation of the bill is affected with fraud, duress or
force and fear, or illegality, the burden of proof that he is the
holder in due course is on him, unless and until he proves that,
subsequent to the alleged fraud or illegality, value has in good faith
been given for the bill by some other holder in due course .

R.S., c. B-5, s. 58.




152. (1) Where a bill has been protested for non-payment, any person
may intervene and pay it under protest for the honour of any party
liable thereon or for the honour of the person for whose account the
bill is drawn.


If more than one offer

(2) Where two or more persons offer to pay a bill for the honour of
different parties, the person whose payment will discharge most
parties to the bill has the preference.


Refusal to receive payment

(3) Where the holder of a bill refuses to receive payment under
protest, he loses his right of recourse against any party who would
have been discharged by that payment . ( you read it here first, Wow
Eh?)


Entitled to bill

(4) The payer for honour, on paying to the holder the amount of the
bill and the notarial expenses incidental to its dishonour, is
entitled to receive both the bill itself and the protest.


Liability for refusing

(5) Where the holder does not on demand in a case described in
subsection (4) deliver up the bill and protest, he is liable to the
payer for honour in damages.

Can you intimidate or obstruct a man or woman with civil law from
doing God's business according to mans law the criminal code? Lets
see!




Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman

176. (1) Every one who

(a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or
endeavours to obstruct or prevent a clergyman or minister from
celebrating divine service or performing any other function in
connection with his calling , or(RonCarelli Vs Duplessis 1959)
SupremeCourtCanada
http://www.summitconnects.com/Articles_Col...s/200412_12.pdf
)

( knowing that a clergyman or minister is about to perform, is on
his way to perform or is returning from the performance of any of the
duties or functions mentioned in paragraph (a)

(i) assaults or offers any violence to him, or

(ii) arrests him on a civil process, or under the pretence of
executing a civil process ,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding two years.


Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings

(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of
persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent
purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.




(3) Every one who, at or near a meeting referred to in subsection (2),
wilfully does anything that disturbs the order or solemnity of the
meeting is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 172.



Idem






Intimidation


Common nuisance




Definition





423. (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an
offence punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without
lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to
abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do,
or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from
doing,

(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or his or her
spouse or common-law partner or children, or injures his or her
property ;

( intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of
that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other
injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or her or a
relative of his or hers, or that the property of any of them will be
damaged;




Common nuisance

180. (1) Every one who commits a common nuisance and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety or health of the public, or

( causes physical injury to any person,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding two years.


Definition

(2) For the purposes of this section, every one commits a common
nuisance who does an unlawful act or fails to discharge a legal duty
and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety, health, property or comfort of the public;
or

( obstructs the public in the exercise or enjoyment of any right
that is common to all the subjects of Her Majesty in Canada.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 176.







http://www.reformed.org/documents/westmins...ith.html#chap22

The law regarding lawful oaths that is still in force but not being
enforced,,,why???
CHAPTER XXII.
Of Lawful Oaths and Vows.

I. A lawful oath is a part of religious wors hip, wherein upon just
occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he
asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or
falsehood of what he sweareth.

II. The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and
therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore
to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to
swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet,
as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word
of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful
oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be
taken.

III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness
of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is
fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath
to any thing but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to
be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to
refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed
by lawful authority.

IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words,
without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin;
but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance,
although to a man's own hurt: nor is it to be violated, although made
to heretics or infidels.

V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be
made with the like religious care , and to be performed with the like
faithfulness.

VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone: and that
it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and
conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for
obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to
necessary duties, or to other things, so far and so long as they may
fitly conduce thereunto.

VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or
what would hinder any duty therein commanded, or which is not in his
own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or
ability from God. In which respects, monastical vows of perpetual
single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from
being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and
sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.

So you can follow the Advise of Ephesians 6:10-20 and Jesus at Matthew
18:15-20 and you will be almost there.

Blessings

Thank you Owlmon, for this post. It looks like it was hard work to get it developed. I read some of it, but finally focused on your information about the word "person". I found it very strange how the Roman stage "colored" the pure meaning of the word with its use of masks that projected sound. To be "with sound" became associated with masks, which symbolized being other than who one really is...an unavoidable outcome of theatrics...if stories are to be told.

Without this tainting by the Romans, with sound is a factual state of most Human Beings. Thanks to Creator, this is so. So in its purest sense the word "person" is a legitimate descriptor of a Human's ability to make noises with their vocal chords. This in itself makes this word insufficient to apply to a Human, if 0ne wishes to address more of a Human besides to be "with sound".

The Roman tainting makes this word even more undesirable, because of association with not being the real individual. While this may be ok on the stage or in the movies, it shouldn't apply to Humans in real life.

This tainting is further aggravated by the extension of the "mask" in the political and corporate part of our world. The false face or front causes so much harm in our societies. It is so hard for most people to be their real selves, sometimes for the fear of offending others. The political and corporate bodies use the mask to rule us. It is all about presentation. Giving us a false image to look at and embrace as, either a "good" truth we should believe in, or as a known fantasy that is ok because it is entertaining...or fullfills some need in some of us.

Myself, I wish the politicians and corporate bosses would just tell the truth no matter how ugly it is. This would be our signal to make changes in the way we do things in life, so that We as Children of Creator can make More and Better our lives and world. The "mask" makes this almost impossible to achieve except in small select circles of individuals who dedicate all, or a lot, of their lives to what is truly needed, in their most honest estimation of matters. It is these few who are the only hope of causing the removal of the mask of the few who mislead. Between the two 'Fews" are the majority of Humanity who follow to survive or get as much as they can out of it. This middle populace is a sea of confusion.

Dear Owlmon. What you have written here for us, is sincerely appreciated. Such is the effort that helps us, if we only would, dispel the confusion of our lives and eventually remove the mask...at least help us to see the truth beneath it.

Respectfully, DAN 1