Full Version : we talked about our ancient history/Tsarion?
ghostchild >>Discussions Then, Now and Again.... >>we talked about our ancient history/Tsarion?


<< Prev | Next >>

Prairyearth- 09-02-2006
From; http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:5ZaMJM...us&ct=clnk&cd=2

Re: Vampires and biocolonialism
Posted by Anonymous on 2006/5/23 22:32:54

Please makes sure you understand and read especially the last part, as the first part explores the Eurocentric Mindset and wrong vonclusions to enable to justify the History Fiction with the Eurocentricism......I am Haplo X.....

http://www.red-ice.net/specialreports/2006...tlantisDNA.html


DNA evidence for Atlantis
Beyond the Bering Strait - DNA Evidence Rocks the Boat
2006 05 21

By Will Hart | genesisrace.com

Article received from Light Eye

In recent years, genetic research has produced unexpected results that have opened the doors to many historical mysteries. The surprising outcomes have also provoked unintended controversy. The reasons that these DNA investigations have sparked intense debates in the fields of anthropology, history and even cultural evolution will become clear as our story unfolds.

The genetic probes began innocently enough with geneticists wanting to see what secrets human genes might reveal about our complex, mysterious and often disputed history. Anthropologists and historians had long thought that the America's had been populated by Asians crossing a land bridge that connected Asia and North America during the last Ice Age. This was referred to as the 'Bering Strait Crossing' theory and was believed to have occurred about 12,000 years ago.

Genetic analysis on Native American DNA samples began in the 1980s. However, the research effort greatly accelerated in the 1990s due to rapid technological progress in the field. In fact, the early results confirmed the generally accepted theory showing a clear link between Native Americans and DNA samples collected from native peoples in Siberian-Asia. Nevertheless, as the studies both deepened and broadened to include Asians across the continent, the increasing data revealed that the migration pattern had been more complex than anthropologist's had envisioned.

The early results showed that Native American tribes were comprised of four distinct mtDNA haplogroups, A, B, C, and D. The haplogroup designations represent four different (maternal) lineages. These four lineages are found throughout North, Central and South America. However, only three of them A, C, and D were discovered in the Siberian-Asian populations. The B haplogroup was traced to aboriginal population groups in Southeast Asia, China, Japan, Melanesia, and Polynesia.

Before proceeding we should briefly clarify what mtDNA is. There are two types of genetic material used for analysis, cellular and mtDNA, the latter is found in human mitochondia outside the nucleus of cells and is only transferred down generations through females, hence mtDNA stands for maternal DNA. This type is simpler than the cellular DNA and it evolves faster,so it is used to distinguish human groups that evolved in separate geographic areas.

In historical terms, what the genetic evidence obtained from mtDNA samples translated into was a much more diverse and complex migration pattern that included people arriving to the America's in boats. Thor Heyerdahl had hypothesized that this was the case by showing that it was possible during his Kon Tiki expeditions across the Pacific Ocean to Peru.

While orthodox anthropologists embraced the results of the earliest DNA findings, the later results caused consternation and controversy. They not only showed that the Americas were settled by many different racial groups coming from many different parts of Asia, the genetic findings also demonstrated that the migration events took place much earlier than previously thought.

Anthropologists, archaeologists and historians had postulated that the migrations had taken place less than 20,000 years ago. DNA analysis placed the initial wave of migration at between 38-50,000 years before present. This finding too raised eyebrows in the orthodox community. However, in recent years radiocarbon dated materials from South America, California and the Southwestern United States has come to light and the dates agree with the conclusions of the DNA research.

Clearly, the genetic investigations had produced a mixed bag of outcomes for orthodox anthropologists and historians. In general, their long held theories about a north Asian origin for Native American populations were proven correct. Nevertheless, their narrow focus on Siberia, the single land-bridge migration route and their chronology had been in error. Some of the Asian immigrants did come from Siberia along that route but other groups came from Japan, Polynesia, etc., in boats and their journeys began in remote antiquity.

Genetic researchers determined that 96% of Native Americans fell into one of the four A-D haplogroups and while these mtDNA types were also found in Asia they are not present in Europe or Africa. This too indicates that Asia was the ancestral region of most Native American tribes. Then in 1997 another lineage was discovered, which geneticists dubbed X. This discovery ignited a storm of controversy that has not died down to this day. The X haplogroup needs careful,thoughtful, and deep historical analysis because this group may well hold one of the most important keys to unlocking the secrets of our collective past.

Obviously about 4 percent of Native Americans, from Alaska to the tip of South America, do not fall into one of the four major haplogroups. Scientists assumed that these minority lineages came from interactions with European and African groups since the time of Columbus. This proved to be true for about 1.5% of Native Americans however 2.5% were found to belong to the X lineage. Once this small mtDNA group was identified as a distinct genetic type, the race was on to ascertain their place of origin.

This is where the mystery really gets complicated and interesting. In spite of the fact that the previous genetic data was forcing the orthodoxy to make some alterations in their migration scheme and chronology, as we saw their basic paradigm had been confirmed. But the discovery of the X haplogroup changed that situation dramatically. It was known to exist in Europe in about 5% of the population and unknown in Asia and Africa at the time. The X lineage was ascertained to have arrived in the Americas from about 38,000 to 10,000 years ago. What could this mean?

At first anthropologists argued that since Europeans had not traveled across the Atlantic at such a remote point in time the X group had to be the outcome of post Columbus contact and intermarriage. However when researchers analyzed ancient DNA samples, found in the Great Lakes (Mound Builder) region, which dated back long before Columbus they identified some of the samples as belonging to the X group. This proved they were not the outcome of any post-Columbus contact and were not of recent origin.

When investigators compiled the genetic data on the distribution of the X haplogroup in the America's what they discovered sent shock waves through the conventional and alternative history camps. The X lineage was only found in a handful of tribes scattered across the country, the Yakima and Sioux in the northwest and the Navajo in the southwest, in about 5% of their populations. However, the greatest concentrations by far occurred in the Ojibway, Oneota and Nuu-Chah-Nulth tribes where almost 25% of the tribal members fell into the X lineage.

Moreover, the vast majority of tribes contained no X members. In fact, it was not found in any native tribes in Central or South America. Again, what did these patterns mean? Independent researchers associated with the Edgar Cayce Association (A.R.E.) quickly pointed out that the data supported some of the material found in the Atlantis readings that the 'sleeping prophet' had given in the 1930s. Cayce noted that some Atlantis refugees had immigrated to the northeastern region of the United States and later formed the Iroquois nation. It was in those tribes that the highest concentration of the X haplogroup was found.

The Cayce readings also claimed that some of these refugees went to the American southwest and others migrated to the Mound Builder region and formed that civilization. Odd that his psychic information would so closely parallel the distribution pattern of the X lineage. Cayce had also given the dates that these migrations had occurred and they too agreed with the DNA findings. The plot was surely thickening in a most fascinating way. If the story stopped here it would be enough to hold interest and provoke thought however it goes farther, much farther.

The apparent widespread presence of the X lineage across what is now known as the United States appears to show a wide initial dispersal. One could postulate a west-east migration of this haplogroup from Siberian Asia. But that scenario poses two serious obstacles:1) the greatest concentration of this group is found in the northeastern region of the United States and 2) X is virtually absent in Asia.

Like a good detective novel, all of the clues had not been uncovered in the late 1990s when the X group had been identified and was being hotly debated. Geneticists pressed forward and launched a probe into the Altai tribe located in the Gobi desert and found the X lineage in small numbers. This is the only population in Asia that exhibits this haplogroup and as such they comprise a tiny, isolated genetic island. Orthodox anthropologists were elated when the news reached their ears. They seized on this finding as smoking gun proof that the X group in North America had its ancestral roots in Siberian Asia, end of story.

To say that this was an unscientific rush to a final conclusion that just happened to agree with their long held beliefs is an understatement. Let us pause and use logic and commonsense and try to walk through what we are being asked to accept. The Gobi Desert is about 8,000 miles from the northeastern section of the United States. We are being told that this tribe trekked that distance and transferred their genes from their ancestral homeland to the Great Lakes without depositing the X group genes in any other part of Asia, Alaska, Canada, and the region between Washington and the Northeast America.

Everyone agrees that any such migration would have taken place during the harshest of conditions since the Ice Age still held this entire region in its frigid grip. Furthermore, we are being asked to suspend our disbelief raised by the notion that a tiny tribe trekked these vast distances across a frozen landscape for unknown reasons. Why would any small tribe risk everything and wander half way around the globe during an ice age when they did not know what lay beyond the next horizon? In fact, anthropologists and historians know that this is not the way human tribes have operated since the dawn of time.

On February 16, 1932 Cayce related some information during a reading that is extraordinarily cogent to this unfolding genetic mystery story. When asked about the position of the continent of Atlantis he replied:

"The position the continent Atlantis occupied, is that as between the Gulf of Mexico on the one hand - and the Mediterranean upon the other. Evidences of this lost civilization are to be found in the Pyrenees and Morocco on the one hand, British Honduras, Yucatan and America upon the other."

Now, we must pick up the trail of clues on the other side of the Atlantic. Let us keep in mind that when Cayce gave this reading DNA had not yet been discovered and there was no such thing as mtDNA analysis. Nevertheless, he mentioned "evidences" in two specific locales, the Pyrenees, a mountain range sandwiched in between France and Spain where the Basques live, and Morocco where another ancient group, the Berbers resides. Astonishingly, these two populations contain the highest frequencies of the X lineage found in Europe and North Africa.

The Basques have long puzzled anthropologists, linguists and historians because, although they are Caucasian they do not fit in with the rest of the European populations. Their language is not related to any other tongue in the world. Prior to the advent of genetic research tools investigators used the ABO blood groups to study the relationships between human populations as well as their migration patterns. The Basques turned out to be unique in terms of blood types as well. As a population they contain the highest levels of Rh- 'O' negative blood in the world and among the lowest type B.

Now, what Cayce was suggesting is that some of the people that fled the sinking continent went west and settled and became the Iroquois. Others went east to the Iberian Peninsula then the Pyrenees (Basques), and the West Coast of North Africa then the Atlas Mountains (Berbers). Turning to the Berbers we find yet another group that contains the highest frequency of haplogroup X in the world. Is it a coincidence that these disparate peoples share a very rare mtDNA lineage?

It is unfortunate that the Berbers have never received much attention from science over the years. Here we have a Caucasian race living in North Africa of all places. Anthropologists dismissed them because they did not fit well into the 'Out of Africa' scenario and it was assumed that they had back immigrated southward from somewhere in Europe. However, that theory has been abandoned and scientists now accept the fact that they are an indigenous people, which they believe go back to the Stone Age. But how can this be we must ask since the rest of the continent below the Sahara is black African?

Article from: http://www.genesisrace.com
Related: Michael Tsarion - Atlantis, Alien Visitation & Genetic Manipulation

The Secret of Eurasia - The Key to Hidden History

Sunspot Cycles & Natural Disasters

Pallas Athena, the Spear Shaker and Francis Bacon

This Post was from: http://ghostchild.com/newbb/viewtopic.php?...50&post_id=4616


DreamWalkerAwake- 09-06-2006
Hi Prairy, hi Relatives!
It is good to be here again!
Thanks to post this thread! I have some information you must read about Rh-, Atlantis and the Guanche People of Canary Islands... it is a lot of info, but very interesting:

Discovery
The Europeans "discovered" the Canary Islands ("Islands of Fortune) in the first half of the 14th century. They find some peoples, which afterwards have been called «Guanches», and which even today are still surrounded of unknown aspects.

As the European conquerors explained, the Guanches were "full-blooded white, very tall, brawny, of great beauty, and there were many blond among them...". The great height had to be understood it relatively, that is, the average size of the Europeans of the period into account. As for the presence of blond, even nowadays, after many centuries of invasions and mixtures, it is asurprising fact that blonde people and blue-eyed people can also be found among the bereberes of the African Atlas.
Some political interests have intended to refuse the Berber origin of the Guanches: to prevent the possibility of some possible claims proceeding from Morocco. But that would be totally illogical: the ancestors of the current Moroccan bereberes and Algerians who emigrated to Canary Islands made it some centuries before the birth of Christ, when there was not either Morocco, nor Algeria, nor Spain, nor the current cultures of those countries.

Alfonso Fernandez de Lugo lands in Tenerife. The island was the last to fall to the Spaniards in 1495
Geographically the Canary Islands are located less than 100 kilometers from the African coast, and unsurprisingly the first inhabitants of the archipelago were Berbers who crossed the straits from Morocco around 3000 BC. By the time of Christ they had spread out across the islands, and were to become known collectively as the Guanche. They Guanche developed a tribal based society led by chiefs, known as menceyes. The menceyes were aided by a council known as tagoror, who met in an open circular space, such such as the one in Garajonay. Here they performed civic functions like adjudicating disputes or holding war council. The Guanche lived in caves, and early cave drawings can be seen in Gran Canaria. They cultivated crops and lived on a staple diet of gofio. They also used a script, again related to Berber, which is yet to be deciphered.


As early as the second century AD the existence of the Canary Islands was known to the Greeks, and the islands were identified with the Atlantis legend. In the first century AD, King Cuba II of Mauritania is said to have visited the islands, but the first incursions by the Europeans didn't take place until the early in the fifteenth century.


Jean de Bethencourt :
As the closest island to the African coast Lanzarote was first to fall in a 2 year campaign led by the Norman Jean de Bethencourt, which ended in 1404. Lanzarote was closely followed by Fuerteventura and the sparsely populated western island of El Hierro. It is important to remember that there was no sense of political unity among the Guanche. Tenerife alone was divided into nine kingdoms, and the Spanish exploited the divisions between the tribes. Over the course of the next century the islands fell, one after another culminating in the conquest of Tenerife by Alfonso Fernandez de Lugo in 1495. Against a backdrop of the reconquista on the mainland, proselytizing priests were eager to spread Christianity among the vanquished natives. Some of the Guanche was sold into slavery, or perished in epidemics introduced by the Europeans, while others assimilated with new arrivals.


Columbus:
The early years of Spanish rule brought prosperity, with the development of the sugar plantations. In 1492 Columbus passed through the Canary Islands en route to the Americas, stopping at La Gomera. While there, he is reported to have seen a major eruption of Mount Teide. The discovery of the new world was to have important consequences for the islands. The burgeoning trade with the Americas saw a large ports spring up as Sant Cruz de Tenerife to became one of the main mercantile hubs of the Spanish Empire. After the subjugation of the Guanche, immigrants poured into the islands from mainland Spain and the towns of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, La Laguna and Santa Cruz de la Palma developed.


http://www.fiestasiesta.co.uk/history/canary_history.html

The Canary islands were known in antiquity as the Western edge of the known world. Homer referred to the Islands of the Blest, lying westward of Maurusia (modern-day Morocco) (see extract from Strabo). The Canaries have also been associated with Plato's description of the island of Atlantis (see extract), though most modern historians discount this suggestion.

It is likely that the first people to discover the Canaries were early Phoenician explorers, originating from Sidon and Tyre in modern-day Lebanon. Herodotus claims that a Phoenician expedition circumnavigated Africa in the 6th century BC (see extract). Carthage, a north-African Phoenician colony, sent a colonising expedition of 30,000 people to the west of Africa in about 425 BC (see extract from Hanno). Phoenician coins are claimed to have been found as far afield as the Azores. Thor Heyerdahl sailed from Africa to South America via the Canary Islands in the Ra, a boat made of papyrus, in order to prove that the journey was possible for ancient mariners.

Around 120 AD, Marinus of Tyre wrote that the habitable world was bounded on the west by the Fortunate Islands. The status of the Fortunate Islands as the western edge of the known world was more formally established when Claudius Ptolemy (AD 90 - 168), following Marinus, adopted the Fortunate Islands as the prime meridian for his Geographia. This was the most famous classical map of the world, unsurpassed for almost 1500 years. The Canaries continued to be widely used as the prime meridian for maps of the world until well into the 19th century - for example, Louis XIII decreed that EL Hierro be used as prime meridian on all French maps in 1634, and this continued until about 1800. Dutch maps of the period used the peak of El Teide on Tenerife as their prime meridian. (see for example this 18th century English engraving).

The Romans are known to have explored the Canary Islands. The most complete classical account of the Canaries is by Pliny the Elder (see extract), taken from a description of an expedition sent by Juba II, governor of the Roman protectorate of Mauretania (modern-day Morocco) from about 29 BC to 20 AD. The islands were found to be uninhabited at the time of this expedition, though Junonia (the Roman name for La Palma) did have a 'small temple built of a single stone', presumably evidence of earlier inhabitants or explorers.

During the middle ages the Canaries become more myth than reality. They figure for example in the search by St Brendan (c. AD 484 - 578) for paradise, which he assumed to be an island in the Atlantic Ocean (map).

Around the end of the 13th century, the Canaries were rediscovered by a Genoese fleet under Lancelot Malocello. A detailed survey was made by Nicoloso de Recco of Genoa in 1341. A papal bull of 1433 awarded rights over the Canaries to Henry the Navigator of Portugal, but this decision was reversed in 1436, when another papal bull awarded these rights to the crown of Castile. In the Alcovas treaty of 1479, Portugal recognised the rights of the Castilians to the Canaries, in return for Castilian recognition of Portugese sovereignty over Fez and Guinea.

At the time of the rediscovery of the Canaries they were inhabited by an indigenous people called the 'Guanches'. We know from cultural similarities that the Guanches were Berbers from the mountains of Northwest Africa. How they reached the Canaries has been the subject of much speculation, particularly since at the time of the rediscovery they apparently had no knowledge of seafaring techniques - surprising for a people living on a small island with other nearby islands clearly visible.

There is evidence for two distinct Guanche racial types , usually referred to as 'Cro-Magnoid' and 'Mediterranean'. Pottery remnants suggest there were up to four distinct waves of colonisation, whilst carbon dating techniques suggest that the first colonists arrived during the first millenium BC.

The Guanches named their island Benahoare, and divided it into 12 kingdoms, each with its own ruler (see map, list). Estimates of the Guanche population at the time of the conquest range from 1,200 to over 4,000.

The Guanches lived in caves, such as those at Belmacho near Mazo , and at Zarza in Garafía . They mummified their dead. The Gaunche religion appears to have centred around stone pyramids, and the Roque Idafe in the Caldera de Taburiente. The legacy of the Guanches includes carvings of geometrical forms and hand-made decorated pottery. Reproductions of these pots are still made, in the artesania El Molino in Mazo

The conquest of the Canaries took from 1402, when Juan de Bethencourt landed on Lanzarote, to 1496, when Tenerife fell to Alonso Fernandez de Lugo. The conquest of La Palma started on the 29th of September of 1492, with the landing on the beaches of Tazacorte by Fernandez de Lugo, and finished on the 3rd of May of the following year. The last king of Benahoare to submit himself to the invaders was the legendary Tanausu, who ruled the Kingdom of Acero (Caldera de Taburiente). After two failed attempts by the Castilian conquistadors to penetrate La Caldera to defeat him, Fernandez de Lugo sent a man called Juan de Palma, a relative of Tanausu already converted to christianity, to establish a truce. Tanausu agreed, but Fernandez de Lugo broke the agreement, and Tanausu was captured in an ambush. Tanausu was taken away into slavery, but refused to eat after leaving the island, and died without seeing land again.

After the conquest, Alonso Fernandez de Lugo was appointed the first governor of Tenerife and La Palma. Since he had been personally responsible for financing the conquest, he was endowed by the crown with powers rather more extensive than the governors of the other islands. These powers included the disposition of slaves, the right to control entry and exit from the islands, to exercise civil and criminal jurisdiction, and to appoint and dismiss judicial deputies.

The richness of the island resulted in immigration not just from Castille, but also of Portugese, Italians, Catalans, Basques and other northern Europeans. Indeed, Fernandez de Lugo was accused at successive judicial enquiries of favouring Genoese and Portugese above native Castilian. The period of immigration was intense but relatively short-lived - after the 1520s immigration almost ceased, until the eighteenth century.

For an impression of La Palma in the period following the conquest, see this map produced by Leonardi Torriani, an Italian engineer who toured the Canaries fron 1587 to 1593 on an inspection of the islands fortifications.

Despite the large number of immigrants, the Guanches did not disappear, being assimilated rather than exterminated. Gaspar Frutuoso writing at the end of the 16th century described the population of La Palma as being evenly divided between Castilian, Portugese and indigenous peoples. He reported these elements of the population as already being largely interbred, indistinguishable in faith and custom, and coexisting as equals.

The principal produce in pre-conquest days were dye-stuffs and shells. Of particular importance was orchil, a moss-like dye-stuff. Wheat was introduced during the 15th century, but towards the end of the century sugar became the dominant export. Apiculture thrived alongside the sugar industry, producing both honey and beeswax.

From the beginning of the 16th century the sugar industry was the basis of a commercial boom. Shipbuilding enterprises were established and Santa Cruz de La Palma's port developed sea connections with Europe and America. The primary interest of foreign merchants was the export of sugar in return for the import of cloth. Hakluyt described the trade by Nicholas Thorne of Bristol in 1526, who exchanged sugar, orchil and goatskins for cloth 'both coarse and fine, broad and narrow, of divers sorts and colours'.

La Palma figured prominently in this boom. One of the largest holdings in the Canaries was the estate held from 1513 by the Welzers, a German banking family, which included all the waters of the Tazacorte valley. Sugar was being produced for export from La Palma in 1515 by the English merchant Thomas Malliard, in partnership with the Genoese Francesco Spinola, at a refinery at Rio de Los Sauces.

The Canaries became strategically important as a stopping point on the route to the newly-discovered Americas. Christopher Columbus stopped at the Canaries (but not La Palma) to restock before crossing the Atlantic for the first time, and later mariners followed the same pattern. The transatlantic sailings were known as the 'carrera de Indias'. From early spring ships would leave Sevilla and follow the clockwise pattern of the prevailing Atlantic trade winds down to the Canaries, and thence across through the islands of the Lesser Antilles into the Southern Caribbean - see the 'Secret Instruction for Navigation between Spain and the Isle of Santo Domingo', published in 1526 by the Casa de Contratacion, the body established in 1503 to regulate the transatlantic trade.

The prosperity of the Canaries attracted famous pirates and corsairs of the time, particularly the French Jambe de Bois (Peg-Leg) who sacked Santa Cruz de La Palma in 1553. Most of the older buildings that can now be seen in Santa Cruz date from the subsequent rebuilding of the city. In 1585 Santa Cruz was attacked by an armada of 24 ships commanded by the English pirate Francis Drake, resulting in the destruction of the harbour fort.

The expansion of the Brazilian sugar industry in the last quarter of the sixteenth century dramatically reduced the demand for Canarian sugar. Wine replaced sugar as the principal export. Of particular importance was the production of Malvasia, a sweet dessert wine.

Malvasia wine remained a major source of income throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, the wine being exported to Britain and the American colonies. The position of the Canaries on the route to the Americas made commerce with the colonies particularly attractive.

The Canarian economy was affected throughout much of this period by trade restrictions imposed by the Casa de Contratacion in Sevilla, which was responsible for overseeing the crown monopoly on trade with the American colonies. For example, in 1610 exports from the Canaries were limited to a total of 1000 tons, of which 300 was from La Palma. The destination of these exports was also restricted. In 1613 the total was reduced to 600 tons and in 1627 to 700. Regulations introduced in 1678 required 5 families to emigrate to America for every 100 tons of exports.

A more liberal regime was introduced by Charles III in the second half of the 18th century. Trade was liberalised from 1778 onwards, and produce included cotton, tobacco and silk. During the 18th century the port of Santa Cruz was regarded as the third largest of the empire, after Antwerp and Sevilla. (see 'Civitas Palmaria', an 18th century watercolour of Santa Cruz).

Portugese and Madeiran wines provided strong competition to Malvasia throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. The wine trade with England slumped at the beginning of the 19th century, with the introduction of port wine to the English market.

The wine trade was replaced around 1825 by the growing of cochineal, a cactus parasite used as a food colouring, which became an important source of income. However, this industry was hit by the introduction of artificial colourings in the 1870s, resulting in widespread hardship.

The production of sugar cane reappeared, and around 1880 a rudimentary tourist industry started. At the turn of the century the first banana plants appeared. The resulting prosperity was however to be short-lived, due to the effects of world war 1 on foreign trade.

Economic hardship during the latter part of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century resulted in high levels of emigration, Cuba being the preferred destination up to the 1930s, and Venezuala subsequently. Many Canarians retain strong family links with Cuba and Venezuala.

The Canarian economy continued to be dominated by agriculture until the early 1960s. Liberalisation introduced by the Franco regime from 1960 onwards allowed an economic revival, based on bananas, annual exports of which exceed 130 million kilograms, plus other produce, forestry and tobacco. Most important of all was the growth of the tourist industry, from 73,240 tourists in 1960 to over 2 million tourists in 1975.

http://www.ing.iac.es/PR/lapalma/history.html


Blood and Rh among Guanches

As it is well known the type of blood is hereditary, this determines that the studies done following the blood analysis offer great credibility and a scientific base of wide reliability is granted to her.

The blood studies carried out in Canary Islands by eminent specialists in 1963 (Schwidetzky), on soft tissues of Guanche mummies before the spanish conquest, show a frequency of 92% of the “O” type of blood, and a 45%of the factor RH - (negative), what determines a homogeneity and a pureness without doubts. It is good to clarify that up to the moment, equal pureness has not found anyway.

The research is centered in several regions of what it is called Guanche Band, on a universe of more than 60.000 people, they take an sample of 1.432 analyses and the results are definitive: more of 70% of the present population has the type of blood O, whereas the factor RH - (negative) it arrives to 60% (the Spanish average is 40% and 15% in relation to the type of blood O and the factor RH - (negative) respectively).

For those that the exposed data do not finish convincing them let's see the test of the cystic fibrosis in its mutant gene G542X.

The called Guanche Band, - according to the catalan author Xavier Estevill i Coll – is a milestone of “strange population” in the Iberian Peninsula for the high and inexplicable frequency of the mutant gene G542X.

The greatest frequency of this mutant are found in Canary Islands with 25%, in Spain it is of 5,7% and in the rest of Europe it is of 3%, whereas the average in the Guanche Band is of 14,4%.

The ozkenazis Jews, with 13,5%, (who have not taken part in the population of theIberian Peninsula), present the nearest value.


There’s also some evidence for the Ancestors of the Guanches as the Founders of Predynastic Egypt:

A theory has been proposed that the Guanches, Nordic Caucasians with similarity to, or descended from, neolithic Cro-Magnon stock, were influential in founding the first civilizations in the region of predynastic (lower) Egypt circa 6000 BP. The Guanches, those who dwelled in the Canary Isles, known as the Elysium, and the Garden of Hesperides by the classical Greeks, also known as the legendary Fortunate Isles or the Isles of Fortune by classical Europeans and Spaniards, were a mysterious people of antiquity, said to be submerged according to their own traditions, from the lands which first bore them, a few score miles off the western coast of what is now northwest Africa. A subtheory or subtheories contained within this paper shall argue that it be of no coincidence that the predynastic Egyptians also maintained this tradition of near-submergence and regeneration and migration from a far-off land (to their west - the Land of Amenti), in their own distant recorded times.

The scope of this paper will argue those theoretical postulations, including historical, linguistic, archaeological, anthropological, geological, religio-mythical and associated criteria and evidences as reasons for the proto-Guanche exploration eastward along the north African coastline from the sinking islands that once made up the sunken lands of the Northwest Atlantic near Europe and Africa were mainly from the stimuli of adverse climactic change. The recreation of their advanced societal knowledge in predynastic Egypt was for the purpose of their societal continuation and regeneration.

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html

The Guanches, Nordic Caucasians with similarity to, or descended from, Cro-Magnon stock who dwelled in the Canary Isles, known as the Elysium, and the Garden of Hesperides by the classical Greeks, also known as the legendary Fortunate Isles or the Isles of Fortune by classical Europeans, those who the Spaniards battled against, invaded and eventually subjugated to complete the first action of European colonial expansion outside of Europes shores - and to get good strategic trade ports for Western Hemisphere trade - were a mysterious people of antiquity, said to be submerged according to their own traditions, from the lands which first bore them, a few score miles off the western coast of what is now northwest Africa.

The scope of this paper will argue the reasons for the proto-Guanche exploration from the sinking islands that once made up the sunken lands of the Northwest Atlantic near Europe and Africa were mainly for reasons of adverse climactic change. The Canary Islands were the homeland of the proto-Guanches descended from a Cro-Magnon people who had migrated there from Northwest Africa some time in the remote past, who like Thoth, sailed from the isles of the West to found a new civilization in pre-dynastic Egypt at least 6000 years ago. This memory was also preserved in the later writings of Plato in his Timaeus and Critaeus of the [sic] Atlanteans sailing through the Pillars of Hercules to subjugate the lands around the Mediterranean under their Empire, though they were stopped by the apparent ancestors of the classical Greeks.


Anthropological and Linguistic Evidence

The distribution of various Cro-Magnon peoples now generally identified as such are mainly in western and northwestern Europe and northwest Africa. Scholars have traced the existence of the Iberian languages, including Iberian, Basque, Berber and the Northwest European languages generally called Celtic - as pre-Indo-European (the Indo-European invasions or series of settlements, colonizations and military invasions in a general sense from Eastern to Western Europe dating from circa 2500 BCE, as actually pre-Celtic and Pre-Indo-European (PRIE), the language group and root from whence Breton, Cymric, and other British Celtic languages evolved; as evidence of the direct lineage of these ancient PRIE languages from their Cro-Magnon ancestors.

R. Cedric Leonard in Quest for Atlantis, (Manor Books, Inc. New York, 1979) cites that evidence is based upon the strict, unchanging nature of Berber languages over 2,000 years and the lack of evidence of an intermediary language family form the hypothetical Cro-Magnon languages and the PRIE languages that scholars have evidence of antedating the Indo-European additions (see Prof. Johannes Friedrich (1957), a leading linguist of the Free University of Berlin, says that the Berber language has not changed at all in the last two thousand years. [Friedrich, Johannes, "Extinct Languages," (translated from German by Frank Gaynor) Philosophical Library, New York, 1957.] If this conservatism in Berber is so pronounced, then it is possible and probable that the history of the remainder of the Guanche language is also cut from the same linguistic cloth of tradition.

In Writing Berber Languages, Lameen Souag indicates the links between the ancient Berber language and Guanche are notable in these writing scripts of Old Libyan groups:

Sometime in the fifth century BC or so (the earliest attested dated inscription was from 138 BC, but the letter forms appear to have developed independently for some time and to have developed from early Phoenician rather than the cursive Punic then current), the Numidians and other early Berber kingdoms developed a script now known as Numidic or Old Libyan. [Writing Berber Languages, by L. Souag, http://www.geocities.com/lameens/tifinagh/]

Souag goes on to state that archaeological evidences of these scripts are found across North Africa to the Canaries:

It is attested from innumerable tombstones and a couple of Numidian governmental inscriptions (most famously a bilingual one at Dougga), from the Canary Islands all the way to Libya, although the letter forms varied to some extent across this vast range, falling into two main groups, eastern and western. This script continued in occasional use up to the late Roman Empire, after which it is not attested anywhere north of the Atlas Mountains. [ibid]

It is probable that trade and movement of peoples prompted the inscriptions of the language across the area, pre-dating the rise of the Roman hegemony in the Mediterranean to the heights of the Cartaginian Empire. It is possible at that time the relations between he Guanches and the peoples of northwest Africa, their linguistic and probable ethnic cousins were at a peak, for by the time of the Spanish invasions of the Canaries the Guanche had apparently forgotten how to read their script and construct naval vessels that they likely sailed in and used over two millennia before.

In A History of Iberian Civilization, Portuguese historian Oliveira Martins hypothesized that the descendants of the hypothetical Cro-Magnon people in the Northwest of Euro-Africa call themselves by names with the suffix tani, such as Lusitani, Aquitani, Mauritani, (A History of Iberian Civilization, Oxford University Press) and one might add Pretanni as the original; or earliest cited name of the inhabitants of the modern-day British Isles. Other scholars, including the pioneering work of the linguist Renan [Renan, Ernest, De l'Origine du Language, Paris, 1858; La Societe' Berbere, Paris, 1873], cite evidence for the PRIE languages which they indicate is at least of the neolithic era and may date backward even further to the paleolithic era of the lithic-dating system of modern archaeology.

Scholars such as Michael Harrison [Harrison, Michael, "The Roots of Witchcraft," Citadel Press, Secaucas, N.J., 1974.] have indicated from their research that the descendants of the Cro-Magnons are represented today by the genetic remnants of the berber and Tuareg peoples of Northwest Africa, the Guanches of the 16th century Canary Islands, the Basques of Northern Spain, French living in the Dordogne Valley, Isle dOleron and Brittany in France, in the general vicinity of the river valleys of the remoter parts of modern northwestern Europe of the past century. Harrison is of the school that believes the PRIE languages including Basque originated in North Africa:

Indeed that Basque should have many words in common with the member of all
the North African group of languages is not surprising, since modern opinion ever
more inclines to credit the Basque with a North African origin . . . (Harrison, 1974)

The anthropologist von Luschan verified the similarities between the craniums of the Guanche and the Cro-Magnons in 1896:

Some twenty years previously Verneau42 had remarked upon the resemblance between Guanche crania from the Canary Islands and these Crô-Magnon skulls, and had postulated a genetic relationship between the two peoples so separated in space and in time. In 1896 von Luschan and Meyer43 reaffirmed this relationship, and this endorsement prepared the way for a more accurate realization of the part played by survivors from the last glacial period in the modern peopling of Europe. [Racial Classification within the White Family, Chapter 8, Sect. 6, ]

Generally dolichocephalic, fair-featured with blond or red-hair, with males over six foot tall and women approaching six feet in height, they were a people of tall, strong and comely appearance, resembling many Northern Europeans today but for a generally greater and more robust stature. Their general appearance and racial characteristic were valued by the Spanish:

"All historians agree in reporting that the Canarians were beautiful. They were tall, well built and of singular proportion. They were also robust and courageous with high mental capacity. Women were very beautiful and Spanish Gentlemen often used to take their wives among the population. The belief that the ancient Canarians were a people favored by great duration of life became popular at the time of the Spanish Conquest ." [The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part IV cont. http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary4.htm]

Their civilization once featured sea-faring, mummifying their dead, dog-taming for hunting and war, thus the Spanish word for the islands, Isle of the Dogs, or Canaries, after the Latin Canis, sing, meaning Dog.

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html


The Canary Islands and their Indigenous Hounds

Dog-taming was a cultural feature of the early European Cro-Magnons and related archaic Caucasian peoples; according to the source, Dog Domestication and History,:

Dogs were first domesticated approximately 12,000 years ago during the last Ice Age. Earliest canine fossil remains were discovered in Iraq and Jordan. Oldest European evidence of dogs was discovered in Yorkshire, England. Those remains were determined to be approximately 9,000 years old. Bones of early dogs have been found in Europe and Asia in archeological digs of human sites.some people speculate that dogs were originally kept as sources of food or that perhaps, in the course of day to day hunting and scavenging, a cooperative relationship developed between primitive dog and man. [http://loudoun.nv.cc.va.us/vetonline/vet116/Dogs/dogdomest.htm]

And Professor I. Lehr Brisbin, Jr. cites the following data about the genesis of dog-taming:

"....Breeds of dogs can not be distinguished from each other by any known anatomical attribute or even biochemical genetic test, including DNA fingerprinting. Since a given breed of dog can not be defined by any scientific means currently known, our contention is that it is not possible to write any ordinance or law that would single them out for special treatment since they cannot be so defined in a legal sense. "Recently I attended a canine genetics workshop at Texas A & M University in which it was further emphasized that there is no biochemical genetic test that can even distinguish wolves from domestic dogs. "....I would taxonomically identify all wolves, wolf hybrids and domestic dogs as the species Canis lupus. Technically, the domestic dog and wolf hybrids should be designated as the sub-species "domesticus". [I. Lehr Brisbin, Jr., Research Professor, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, The University of Georgia. Letter, 30, Jan. 1990]

Though the tradition of dog-taming for hunter-gatherer and perhaps more advanced cultures may date to even earlier periods than the currently accepted dates, the similarity between the Guanche and pre-dynastic Egyptian cultures in using hunting dogs is noteworthy in conjunction with the other facts which shall be brought to this cope of this paper. The antiquity of dog-taming by neolithic humans cannot be denied and it is upon the Guanche-inhabited Canary Islands that the practice continued at least until the Spanish invasions of the 1500s CE.

Egypt scholar Michael Rice indicates that the importance of animals and pets to the Ancient Egyptians, alike the proto-Guanches, transcended the mundane necessities of life such as hunting and became ritually important in their mythology:

After the emergence of the fetishes, the next phase of Egyptian god-making turned to invest certain animal forms with the prerogatives of divinity. The slate palettes which are amongst the earliest graphic representations to survive provide much evidence of this practice: scorpions, lions, bulls, the ubiquitous falcon, the ibex, gazelle, hounds are all shown as personifications of the gods, assisting the King in putting down his enemies or in conducting the rituals of the state. Men needed the power of animals; even the early Kings, in the later Predynastic period and the First Dynasty, called themselves by animal names: Scorpion, Catfish, Fighting Hawk, Serpent are four of the best known." [Egypts Making The Origins of Ancient Egypt 5000-2000 B.C., by Michael Rice, copyright 1990.]

Pharaohs such as the marginally important Tut-ankh-amen were often depicted in hunting scenes with their dogs chasing game although it is not currently known how the commoners used hounds, or if they saw them as nuisances, such as the wild dogs and jackals of the countryside, to be put away.

It is known that the proto-Guanches used dogs in hunting and the kings probably used them as well, for the breed was on the islands invaded by the Spanish and could not have crossed the seventy miles of ocean from northwest Africa without the aid of human beings; how long the breed had been on the Canaries is a matter of conjecture but as there has never been any evidence of Roman occupation or exploration of the Canaries, dating from at least the time of the Cartaginians, circa 200 BCE, if not with the expeditions between the Canaries and Berber northwest Africa circa 1000 BCE or earlier.

If it was well-known in the classical world how to circumnavigate large islands and travel between widely-placed cities within continents, why would the ancients, given ample economic or political reasons, or indeed in catastrophe, not have traveled further afield? David Eccott illuminates interesting new archaeological evidence to support to the ancient naval movements of northwest african Berbers:

They were able seafarers who explored the Atlantic Ocean as early as the first millennium BC and, as the Lixitae of classical tradition, acted as pilots, translators and perhaps even crews for Carthaginian sea-captains. Moreover, they are accepted to have been synonymous with the Guanches of the Canary Islands, who also utilised Egyptian religious symbolism a case made recently on British television by Egyptologist and mummy expert Joanne Fletcher. [David Eccott, http://www.andrewcollins.net/page/mysteries/deccott.htm]

Eccott also cites interesting information about the knowledge of the Roman geographers of the later classical era:

For instance, we have the evidence of the Roman wrecks laying uninvestigated off the coasts of Brazil and Honduras (and possibly even another in a river which forms the border between Costa Rica and Nicaragua). Furthermore, Statius Sebosus, the Roman geographer of c. 100 BC, tells us that it was forty days sail from the Gorgades (the Cape Verdes) and the Hesperides (the Islands of the Ladies of the West, unquestionably the Caribbean see GATEWAY TO ATLANTIS). [Ibid]

There is a breed of dog, the Spanish Galgo, said to be descended from the hunting dogs of ancient Egypt and resembling the greyhound; this theory is explained by the writer:

We can be quite sure that the Spanish Hound is a descendant of the Vertades Romano, which reached Spain with the Romans. This roman race, itself a descendant of the Egyptians Hound resembles the pharaonic race. The only noticeable difference is the position of the ears as the egyptian dogs have erect ears and the Spanish Hound has rose-shaped ears.

Another theory is that the celts brought the Greyhound to the peninsula, when they settled in Gaul and thus the reason for its name in latin "canis gallicus". There
There is no doubt that the Spanish Hound is a descendant of the ancient pharaonic dogs. There is also another, more illogical, theory which says that it is a descendant of the Sloughi, and arrived in Spain with the arabs in the ninth century.

The latest investigations point to the fact there were two branches of similar dogs from different points (the Romans and the Celts) and the successive crossbreeding through the years could explain the differences that exist between the Ibizan Hound and the Spanish Hound. [De Vil Kennel, http://www.sendanet.es/sastre/DeVilKennel/history.html, 2002]

Regardless of the dates of the arrival of the hounds of the Canaries, there is currently no evidence to prove that the dogs of the Canaries were in fact indigenous to the islands before the submersion of what became the land shelves beneath that island archipelago, and that therefore they had to be brought either by the proto-Guanches or some earlier indigenous population or populations. Recent evidence from archaeological digs has indicated a human presence from at least 6,000 years ago, far back-dating the presence of human inhabitation on those islands.

It is interesting to note that Plato recorded the Kings of Atlantis as wearing the skins of dolphins and that they figured into their mythology as kings of the sea, such as Poseidon. The Canaries also have a population of sea mammals including:

There are also sea mammals: dolphins (Delphinus delphus and Tursiops truncatus) and whales (Physeter macrocephalus and Globicephala macrorhynchus) and something called in Spanish Zifo comun (Ziphius cavirostris). [Fauna de las Islas Canarias by Jose Manuel Moreno, Ediciones Turquesa, 1992]

These mammals, like the hounds of the land, have a reputation for being friendly to man and especially to sea-farers.

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html


Artifacts of Guanche Worship and Comparison to Ancient Egyptian Analogues

Pyramid building, mummification, and myths and religion of the Guanches were similar to that of the ancient Egyptians of the Pre-Dynastic and early Old Kingdom periods.

It is said that the Guanches by the time of the Spanish crowns invasion in the 1500s CE, had forgotten their ancient scripts, apparently resembling the Phonecian alphabet, although it is unknown if it was their original script, a similar alphabetical transferrence at some remoter time in their past, or a script similar to but not identical in phonology, syntactical or literal meaning to the proto-Phonecian, Phonecian, Cartaginian, Libyan or related North African semitic alphabet with Hamitic, probably with spoken neolithic Basque or its similarities to the indigenous Berber language.

It is known that their language closely resembles both Basque (Euskadi) and spoken Berber (the Tifinagh language), indicating an ancient or classical lingual and perhaps cultural or ethnic linkage between the three groups, though the Canary Islands have ben inhabited for longer period of time than the initial theoretical Guanche colonization of North Africa over 3000 BP - or the Berber colonization of the Canaries, though there would have been indigenous peoples in the archipelago antedating the Berbers of 1000 BC, due to recent archaeological discoveries in the Canaries that will be cited later in the scope of this paper.


Historical Overview of the Guanches

Some scholars speculate that the Guanches were remnants of a pre-cataclysmic oceanic population in the Atlantic based in the Canaries which became water-logged through natural geological upheaval and eventual devastation; Charles Berlitz thought that they could have been survivors of that cataclysms who came by boat from remoter areas. Others have speculated a Cro-Magnon connection which would have necessitated the construction of naval vessels for the settling of these islands a hundred miles from the African and a few hundred from the European shores. However it should be pointed out that the islands were closer to the African and European coasts due to expansion of total island size due to lower oceanic levels at the time of the late Cro-Magnon or Azilian period in particular and may have been easier to colonize or migrate from during those geological periods.

There is interesting evidence in linguistic history which indicates the Cro-Magnon and Azilian connection between the European continent and the Canaries:

The antiquity of some of the words (in some cases) are pre-4,000 B.C. in its use or beginnings and which can make scholars conclude from this no doubt 6,000 B.C. with this date at least that the beginning of Canary Island inhabitants migration and possibly older as being very plausible. For Guanche is actually older by name then Ben. Ben is well known at least 3,400 B.C. in Egyptian description, or language. We know there was a great migration of Azilians a Cro-Magnon descendant at around 10,000-8,000 B.C. which ironically the word 'Azil' was a Canary word? Could they be the one and the same? [The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part II cont. http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary2.htm]
Some scholars have speculated that the Guanches were remnants of a Vandalic slave population from the Roman period, taken to the Canary Islands, and due to the natural distance between islands of the Canarian archipelago, had forgotten how to navigate upon the oceans, became physically and then culturally stranded; their building structures and society had had fallen into disarray.

However a slave population on the small and climatologically diverse islands would have been unusual for its functional uselessness, unless other minerals were mined from the Canaries that are not in abundance today or they were way-stations populated by a small coterie of imperial or royal administrators for other nautical destinations. Then as now the hot springs, and forests - though the forests had been cut down largely by the time of the Spanish colonization - were noteworthy aspects of the islands, as well as the great island peak at Grand Canaria, but any slave-based economy based on any form of agriculture for a larger-scale population than a subsistence herding population, would have been difficult to achieve on a series of geologically unstable ocean archipelgoes, lending credence to the idea of either a slash-and-burn slave colonization of the archipelago and as a way-station for seafarers.

In Alternative Gomera, writer Nicholas Albery posits the following information about the Guanches:

The Guanche may have had Berber connections (in Tenerife, Guan meant man, but each island had its own language, with similarities between the islands. The languages are now lost, although some Guanche surnames and place names and about 3000 words survive). [Alternative Gomera, by Nicholas Albery, 2001]

Concerning the state of the Guanche civilization at the time of the analysis he presents, around the Spanish invasion, Albery indicates the following:

The Guanche buried the mummified bodies of their dead in bricked-up caves in as inaccessible spots as possible, and they followed a Stone Age way of life (without even the use of the potters wheel) into the middle ages. They had no bread, using a gofio barley flour instead. They had no chisels or metal instruments. Supposedly their only way of fishing was to jump into the sea so as to frighten the fish into their reed nets. On Tenerife island even the art of swimming is said to have been unknown. None of the Canary Islands except Hierro discovered how to produce alcohol by distillation, so that water and palm juice were the only drinks. They had no cotton or flax, only chamois leather. And no needles, only awls made of fish bone or palm thorns. They used cattle as a symbol of wealth, and the nobility had slaves or commoners as servants. Shields were made from the bark of the dragon tree. [Ibid]

It is possible like many civilizations, especially those living on small archipelagoes, the inhabitants rose and fell from savagery many times in their millennia of history and that the Spanish colonized their islands at a low point in their history. It is difficult to imagine people indigenous to island archipelagoes so close to one another would not now how to or want to construct boats, or know how to swim, unless they had regressed in civilization due to civil strife and subsequent cultural reduction, or cataclysm. Their usage of cattle as wealth is indicative of a Berber and far earlier Cro-Magnon predilection, as evidence by the Cro-Magnon art of human hunters and elaborately drawn cattle herds, oxen, antelope, and other animals.

It is also noted that Cro-Magnon and post-Cro-Magnon Azilian-era sites in Europe indicated usage of needles and clothing for sewing, thousands of years before the explanation of the primitive state of their possible descendants in he Guanches and proto-Guanches of the Canary Islands.

Another explanation is that the Romans took the Guanches ancestors to the Canaries as they were prisoners, and utilized the Canaries as a prison colony. However, the Phonecians recorded their efforts at the Canaries while embarking on mercantile activities in the eastern Atlantic and the theoretical Berber contact several hundred years before would antedate a Phoenician discovery of the Canaries. Moreover the archaic step-pyramid building, dog-training and astronomy of the Guanches are cultural features that do not have Roman or Cartaginian precedents and their linkage to Phonecian cultures are tenuous. This lends support to a native Guanche culture earlier than the classical period of the Mediterranean.

Nevertheless the linguistic archaeology points to an earlier influence or utilization of script; a Cartaginian or Libyan language similar to Tifinagh, the language of the Tamazight or Berber peoples of North West Africa who also have the fair features of the Guanche; their geographical proximity to the Canary Islands is also noted. Furthermore little if any Roman influence seems apparent in the artefacts or archaeology or language in the Guanche Canary Islands. It is argued that the Guanche Canarians were part of a trading station that enabled them movement southeast across the Atlantic to the trading and colony centers of the Americas as well as to their colonies along the Mediterranean coast and that their culture was autocthonous in late neolithic Europe and spread outward to encompass others, including an eventual Berber/Tamazight culture in Northwest Africa in the late neolithic period. This Guanche culture extended into the early Spanish period when it was irradiated and transformed into a European culture.

Scholars point to the resemblance between the Guanche or proto-Guanche, Egyptian, and Mayan cultures in their usage of pyramids and other archaeological evidences of the societal linkages between far-flung cultures, pointing to a greater usage of sea-faring and exploration in pre-Mediaeval times than is commonly accepted by orthodox historians of Egypt:

The famous explorer, Thor Heyerdahl, who "rediscovered" the pyramids on the Canary Islands and who set up an academic body to study the phenomena, argued that the pyramids may be remains from explorers who sailed the Atlantic in ancient times, and who may have possibly forged a link with the pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas.

As the original inhabitants of the Canary Islands were fair-haired and bearded, it was possible, Heyerdahl suggested, that long before the 15th Century, people of the same stock as those who settled the Canary Islands, also sailed the same route along the Canary Current that took Christopher Columbus to the Americas. [Guanche Type Pyramids Found in Mexico, http://www.white- history.com/hwr6a.htm]

These people as well as the nearby Nehmadi [for a fascinating travellers account of the Nehmadi, vide The Songlines, by Bruce Chatwin], a surviving Nordic Caucasian hunter-gatherer tribe in a modern area of Berbers, Arabs and mulatto or Negro slaves, a tribe which uses tamed dogs and jackals to help in their hunt for antelope and other prey, in Berber North Africa, yet more primitive than the Berber. It is likely that the Nehmadi are related to the Guanches, or to Vandals or earlier Germanic peoples who lived in North Africa, or to the Amazight (or Berber in the Arab tongue); these are two threads in the great weaving of an apparent ancient, pre-Egyptian old Kingdom of the pre-dynastic era, in and of itself a loose historical term explaining both the animistic nomes cultural features of the river cities of the Nile, and the cyclopean architecture of the predynastic period in ancient Egypt which perhaps featured the technology and culture of ancient Nordic Caucasian colonizers and sea-farers.

The author continues, citing the similarities between the Guanche and Egyptian pyramid-building styles:

However, the most stunning link between the Guanches and the Egyptians comes in the form of pyramids - the Guanches built several small step pyramids on the islands, using exactly the same model as those found in ancient Egypt and in Mesopotamia. The pyramids have an east-west alignment which also indicates that they probably had a religious purpose, associated with the rise and setting of the sun.

Carefully built stairways on the west side of each pyramid lead up to the summit, which in each case has a flat platform covered with gravel, possibly used for religious or ceremonial purposes. [The Guanche Pyramids on the Canary Isles, http://www.White-History.com, by Arthur Kemp.]

Through recent archaeological data were are able to recalculate with greater probability of historical accuracy the ages of some of the most important cyclopean or prehistoric and grey-dated architecture in Egypt, the Sphinx, Great Pyramid and Gizeh, and the Osirieon complex back further than the orthodox Egyptologist dating of these structure-ruins at approximately the rein of the Old Kingdom Pharaoh Khufu (circa 2800 BC or 4800 BP) past the rein of Nar-mer circa 5000 BP, to approximately 4000 BC or 6000 BP or earlier, to the era of the mediterranean-wide colonization of sea-faring nordics of the archaic, post Cro-Magnon Azilian-era archaic Europeans. It is therefore possible that some of these people became proto-Guanches.

Concerning the evidence for cross-cultural contact between the northwest African Berbers and the Egyptians in remoter periods, in the classical period, circa 950-700 BCE, the Berber peoples had a reign of several pharaohs as cited by Habiba Boumlik:

...the first mention of the Amazigh people in historical records: the founding by Amazigh Pharaoh Sheshonq I of the 22nd pharaonic dynasty in 950 BC, followed by the 23rd and 24th Amazigh pharaonic dynasties, over 200 years (950 BC-712 BC) of Amazigh rule in ancient Egypt. According to ancient Egyptian historian Manetho (3rd century BC) and archeological records, the Amazigh Pharaonic dynasties brought back stability to Egypt by reunifying it and defending it against foreign invasion from the East. [Habiba Boumlik, The Celebration of Yennayer/Amazigh New Year, http://www.waac.org/amazigh/culture/yennay...ba_boumlik.html]

This may not be the first instance of far western African cultures influencing far eastern African cultures as shall be demonstrated later on.

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html


Guanche Habits

It is known that the Guanche used an odd whistled language called silbo, perhaps to communicate across the valleys and volcanic hills of the multi-climated Canary Islands; their mixed Spanish descendants are said to use the language today. Whistling is also useful as a non-verbal language for seafarers. In Alternative Gomera, by Nicholas Albery, 2001, the author states the history and current usage of silbo as follows:

The language of Gomera nowadays is Spanish. Some of the older inhabitants can still use the intriguing Gomeran whistling language, el silbo, useful for conveying quite detailed information from mountain-top to mountain-top, such as meet you in the cafe by the plaza for a drink at 12. Some whistlers can make themselves understood up to five miles away, with a following wind, it is claimed. The whistle is demonstrated at some of the tourist restaurants, is recognised by UNESCO as a language whose survival is threatened, and is taught to 9 and 10 year olds in specialised classes in school. The whistle compresses all spoken sounds to four consonants and two vowels, using varying tone and length. Some experts say that the whistling originated from the Berbers in the high Atlas in Morocco, although the Turks near the Black Sea in the Kuskoy valley do a similar form of whistling. [Ibid]

It is unknown if the ancient Egyptians used such methods of communication in their daily lives. Pottery found on the Canaries indicates an ancient cultural connection between the pottery making of northeast Africa and the Mediterranean and the Guanche or proto-Guanche:

While in Tenerife pottery is for the most part plain ware with oval bottom, mainly produced for utilitarian purposes after the Neolithic models, that of Gran Canaria shows skillful use of red and black scheme with geometric motifs recalling pre-Minoan Crete." [The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part IV cont. http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary4.htm]


The Flood According to the Egyptians

Floods occurred throughout the ancient world, and some had devastating effect over wide regions. Concerning the theological ramifications in the Egyptian culture regarding ancient flood of the Eastern Mediterranean, R. Cedric Leonard states:

Nu, the Egyptian god of the Primeval Sea, is represented on the marble sarcophagus of Seti I as being up to his waist in water with arms upraised to carry the Solar Boat across the Sky. He is said to have held the royal occupants of this boat above the flood waters engulfing their mountainous island home in the West. Nu had been ordered to bring about this very flood by Atum in order to purify the world (Budge, 1960). Does this primeval flood scene depict the first migration from the Lands of the West to Egypt because of the inundation of Atlantis? (Ancient Egyptian Writings, R. Cedric Leonard, http://www.atlantisquest.com/Hiero.html)

Aside from the obvious etymological and perhaps cultural diffusion in the similarities between the Hebrew No-ah and the Egyptian Nu, who travels the primeval sea in a solar boat, it is likely that the ancient Egyptians based their religion in part on their history, as did the later Hebrew people with their accounts of Abrahams flight and settlement into Egypt during a time of famine and Moses exodus from Egypt with the body of the Israelite people. If this is the case it points more strongly to a common cultural record of origin in the flooded lands of southeast Europe, or even the volcanic islands of the far eastern Atlantic of the founders of the Pre-Dynastic kingdoms of Lower Egypt.

The Proto-Guanche Historical Origins of the Egyptian God Thoth

While the Guanche were known to have worshipped the god of the sun, and of higher thought, Men-cey, (note that the first Egyptian pharaohs called themselves Men-es) or the revelation of god through the sun, it is unknown what the other gods, if any, of their pantheons were. Yet throughout the ancient Egyptian writings of the God-Kings before the Pharaohs, are references to men of other lands who became gods of wisdom before migrating to lower Egypt. One of them was Thoth, traditionally designated by historians and Egyptologists as the Egyptian God of Writing and Wisdom. Leonard states:

Thoth was born in a distant country to the west which was across a body of water. Its main city was by the sea (Plato's metropolis). The land possessed volcanoes and, like Atlantis, had a low mountain or large hill in the center. This land is sometimes referred to as the Isle of Flame. (Book of the Dead, Hymn of Rameses IV and Pyramid Texts)

A catastrophe occurred which darkened the sun and disturbed the gods, but Thoth led them across the sea to an eastern country [Egypt]. Thoth is depicted as the "controller of the Flood," (Leyden Papyrus) and the Theban Recension includes the Island of Flame in the Flood story. (Papyrus of Ani, Chap. CLXXV)

In Chapter LXXXV of the Book of the Dead, Thoth rules the "Western Domain," and by the end of the New Kingdom he is called "Lord of the West". (Seth, 1912) Thoth is depicted standing in sht htp [the "field of peace" known to the Greeks as the Elysian Fields], holding his writing quill and palette. The question is pertinent: Was Thoth an Atlantean god-king? [R. Cedric Leonard, http://www.atlantisquest.com/Hiero.html]

The sacred island of the Guanches, the Gran Canaria, is a great mountain, white peaked, with very little arable land surrounding it as it juts forth from the Atlantic, similar to the description of the Isle of Rame, indicating an interesting similarity in the volcanic homeland of Thoth It may not be possible to prove that Thoth was an Atlantean God-King, but there are indications that the isles of the West were the Canary Islands, and that proto-Guanches of a more advanced state did explore outside of their archipelago with their astronomical, navigational and cultural knowledge and achievements of the late neolithic era.

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html


Canary Islands: Home of the Guanches

The Canary Islands, located in the Atlantic Ocean near the Tropic of Cancer, immediately west of the African coast (near the ancient Berber/Tamazight lands) form an archipelago made of seven islands and six smaller islets. Their naval coordinates are between 27 degrees north and 29.5 degrees north and go as far west as 18 degrees. It is not surprising that some historians and other scientists speculate that the ancient culture and people of these islands are directly related to the ancient indigenous inhabitants of Northwest Africa, the Tamazight.

The Canarian writer Juan Rancel tells the following:

Roman naturalist Plinius wrote that Juba, King of Mauritania and vassal of Rome in the I century b.C., sent an expedition to explore the mythical Fortunate Islands which were in the Dark Ocean beyond the Columns of Hercules (the Strait of Gibraltar). They gave name to some of these islands. One they called "Nivaria" for the snow covering its mountains (nivea=snow, in latin) -the island of Tenerife. Other was called "Herbania" (herba=grass, in latin) for the meadows they found there. A third one was named "Junonia" for the many doves they saw; the dove was the bird dedicated to goddess Juno. And one of the islands, in which they found a fierce breed of dogs (can, canis in latin), was called "Canaria"...

Regardless of what Plinius wrote in the I century a.C., the fact is that the island called today Gran Canaria was inhabited by a tribe who called themselves the "canarii". The islands were called "Fortunate Islands" or "Islands of Fortune". During the XV century, the island of Canaria became famous for the brave defense deployed by their natives against the landings of the conquistadores. They started to call all islands "the Islands of Canaria", from which they were later called "Canary Islands" (Canarias, in Spanish). (The Canarian Balcony, Juan Rancel)

The Egyptian pharaohs from Pre Dynastic times used hunting dogs throughout their funeary stela, bas-reliefs, statues and in their daily life; the God of the Dead was Anubis, and the ancient Egyptians were known to have bred several breeds of hunting dogs for the courts usage for war and for sport. The western islands which suffered much natural catastrophism were none other than the Canarian Islands, nearly directly west of Lower Egypt, but removed by thousands of miles across the Atlas Mountains and the once fertile plains of the Sahara. If the lands of the Northwest of Africa were more hospitable in those days, it is not surprising that the proto-Guanches could have sailed the 70 plus miles from the eastern Canaries to the African mainland and then followed the African coast to the geologically safe and fertile Nile River delta.

It is quite possible therefore that the inundated, fleeing proto-Guanche sailed due eastward with little trepidation, as in those days the climate of the Sahara was different:

...the Eastern Sahara was of a Savannah Environment with plentiful flora and fauna, with a far higher taxonomic variety than today. Wild herds of grazing antelope, gazelle and cattle made easy game for hunting. However since the end of the last Ice Age North Africa has been undergoing environmental change, with climatic fluctuations. Increasing desiccation at the end of the Pleistocene (start of the Holocene) most likely induced human groups to merge towards the Nile (Childe 1934; Hassan 1984b). Indeed from as early as 15000 BC we have various examples of Palaeolithic sites with stone tool assemblages, distributed along the desert limits. (Egyptvoyager.com: The Nile Valey-Egypt 8/02)

However if the proto-Guanche at that time utilized naval resources for travel, the navigation from the Canary Streams, northwest across the western shore of Africa and through the Pillars of Hercules would have made a simple trip through the relatively easier to navigate Mediterranean. Furthermore the climate of North Africa 6000 BP was far gentler and climatological evidence points to a savannah-like North Africa, with running streams and forest like the Serengeti plains of Southern Africa.

The journey from the volcanic disturbances in the Canaries would have been generally uneventful one in a time of peace, given there were human populations and ample food and water along the pleasant subtropical or temperate climate of North Africa at that time, capable of supporting human life in advanced numbers. If the proto-Guanche survivors knew about Northwest Africa then they might have known about lushness and perhaps relative primitivity of the Nile Valley inhabitants as well.

(....to be continued)

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-06-2006
.../...
R. Cedric Leonard further indicates the following concerning the archaic records of Pre-Dynastic Egypt:

On much shakier ground is a claim by Dr. Paul Schliemann, grandson of the famous Heinrich Schliemann, that among other relics relating to Atlantis he discovered an Egyptian papyrus in the Hermitage at Leningrad which said: "Pharaoh Sent sent out an expedition to the west in search of Atlantis from whence 3350 years before the Egyptians arrived carrying with themselves all the wisdom of their native land. The expedition returned after five years with the report that they had found neither people nor objects which could give them a clue to the vanished land." (Schliemann, 1912)

This papyrus has never been seen by anyone else, so it remains in limbo. Had Schliemann used the term "Land of the West" instead of "Atlantis" it would be a little more believable. However, I did find that there actually was a pharoah with the unlikely name Sent. Pharoah Sent, or Senta, was the fifth king of the IInd Dynasty who ruled approximately 4000 B.C. (Budge, 1960)

A measure of support for Dr. Schliemann's "discovery" comes in the form of a long record inscribed on the great Ebony Label found in the tomb of Menes at Abydos, which upon translation told how this "great admiral" and "world emperor" in his old age embarked on "a voyage of exploration with his fleet" to the "Furthest West Sunset Land in the Western Ocean". Unfortunately for the great admiral, it was on this voyage that he met his tragic death. The place-name given in the inscription for this Far Western Island appears to read "Urani," which calls to mind Uranos, the first king of the Titans! [R. Cedric Leonard, http://www.atlantisquest.com/Hiero.html]

Further evidence of the Phonecian exploits and sea-faring usage of the isles of modern-day Gibraltar and the Canaries for expedition from the eastern Mediterranean westward confirm what is being hinted at by records of Caucasian travels to the New World, including the Caucasians of the proto-Guanche, post-Cro-Magnon Nordics of the Guanche dolichocephalic type. There are compelling clues to continuing late neolithic through classical and pre-Spanish contact between the greater eastern and western Mediterranean cultures.

Here Pablo Atoche Pena cites compelling data:

A votive cave on the Mediterranean island of Gibraltar has provided vital clues that the Phoenicians ventured out into the Atlantic Ocean as early as the 8th century BC.

Over the past 10 years archaeologists have unearthed several thousand items which show that the ancient religious shrine, which faces out to sea, was dedicated to Melkart, the Phoenician form of the classical god Hercules. It was found to contain 400 pottery jars, 25 blue, yellow and green glass perfume and ointment bottles, 10 finger rings and a large number of figurine pendants depicting representations of Melkart. In addition to these items, a selection of the votive pieces were found to depict Egyptian gods such as Bes and Horus.

Late Neolithic Geology in The Mediterranean

A regional flood circa 7600 BP decimated the population centers around what is now the Black Sea and the cultures and perhaps cities of southeastern Europe (including the Catal Huyuk civilization) while the Azilian and post-Azilian Tardenoisian and Maglemosian mesolithic cultures in western Europe (The Stone Age, http://ragz-international.com/stone_age.htm) which featured seafaring, star-reading, writing, agriculture, advanced stone weapons and utensils development, mathematics, ritual dead burial, the architecting, planning and building of small cities and extensive trade appeared to flourish.

In what were the trading cities of the Black Sea, a body of water mainly lacking in oxygen which is a fine preserver of artefacts, a great migration of archaic Nordic Caucasians resulted in the resettling and colonization of the Eastern and Southern Mediterranean including the coasts of Lower Egypt. As is noted in this Pre Dynastic immigration due to the historical flood:
The modern-day sea was formed 7,500 years ago when melting glaciers raised sea level until the waters of the Mediterranean breached the natural dam at the Bosporus. (Noah's Flood, by Columbia University geologists William Ryan and Walter Pitman)

And it is noteworthy from a hydrological and geological perspective that the flood dynamics in the area were such that created unusual geological anomalies:

The flood also created a two-layered body of water, which permanently interfered with the normal convection that brings deep water to the surface for oxygenation. The less dense fresh water lay like a lid on top of the denser Mediterranean water, sterile once its original oxygen had been used up. Today the top 500 feet of the Black Sea supports a thriving marine life, but the rest is as dead as the ancient day when the flood waters settled. (Black Sea Artifacts May be Evidence of Biblical Flood by Guy Gugliotta, Washington Post, September 13, 2000 http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/...2000Sep12.html)

Perhaps supplying the first and founding Nordic and Mediterranean rulers of that fabled civilization, to at least 5000 BP, empire in Southwest Europe, surrounding Islands, and North Africa.

It may be conjectured even further that these archaic Caucasians were the legendary Atlanteans in that they dwelled by the pillars of Hercules, to paraphrase Plato, in the Atlantic ocean (named for Atlas after the Greek mythological god who held up the world on his shoulders), or that the proto-Guanche were indeed survivors of a more advanced neolithic, island and north-west based African Canarian civilization before volcanic disturbances in the early neolithic period) attributed by Plato or the predecessors of descendants of Noahs era slowly broke apart their island to form todays archipelago. It is hypothesized that these Guanche ancestors sailed the Atlantic to North and South America to feed their growing civilization. Yet let us first examine evidence to indicate they were the founders of Pre-Dynastic Egypt.

Guanche Mummification Practices and Similarities to Egyptian Mummification Practices
The Guanche maintained a tradition of mummification of the elite of their society once they had reached the point of death. In this practice they too were similar to the Egyptian rite of mummification for their Pharaohs and court royalty; other Near Eastern classical peoples including the Israelites (who had Joseph mummified in Egypt before being transported to Israel) practiced the rite as well for their deceased leaders.

The Guanche had a nearly monotheistic religion and furthermore there is some evidence that they mummified their dead in the following manner:

The ancient Canarians worshipped the sun which they called 'Almogaren'. ('Almogaren' is very Irish and Scottish sounding both of which do have ancient Basque connections such as 'Alma' or God or Almaner and Garen i.e. a 'crown' which is God's Crown related to the circled looking sun.) The ritual of the Canarian religion was pure and simple. A class of high priests, called Faycans (not Pagans but use the ***a or Figa, or Vega-n term), directed the activities of the cult. There were also corporations of nuns who lived in caves like the hermits of the early Christian times. They were called Arimaguadas, or Maguadas."

(Note- The indication of this a is a prefix and suffix doublet of 'God' in Ari, and Das or Roman Dias the middle is Magua or a 'Persian like' Zoraster type of Fire-Sun God. This would explain the type of people indicated as having a Semitic almost Mongoloidish facial characteristics.) [The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part II cont.
http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary2.htm]

The author further goes on to state that:

The Canarians belonging to the upper class used to embalm the body of their dead. There were different methods of embalming which, similarly to Ancient Egypt, varied according to the rank and financial position of the family. [The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part II cont.
http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary2.htm]

The Guanche Mummies were found by explorers and archaeologists in a number of areas on the Canary Islands from the Spanish period circa 1400 CE onward:
Found primarily in caves on four of the seven Canary Islands, Guanche mummies once numbered in the thousands. Today only a handful remain, mostly in museum collections (which may not be on display).

Very little research concerning the Guanche mummies has been carried out, and definite dates that the mummies were produced are not known. The mummies were initially found by the Spanish during the 1400s as they conquered the island chain; other explorers discovered more over the next few centuries. Most Guanche mummies would have been made prior to 1400. (SOURCE: Conrado Rodriguez- Martín, "The Guanche Mummies." In Mummies, Disease, and Ancient Cultures by Aidan Cockburn, Eve Cockburn, and Theodore Reyman. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998.]

The genetic dating and scientific testing of the Guanche mummies in tissue and dating samples has recently begun, but we can verifiy the methods of their mummification to verify their similarities with the Egyptian rites of mummification and point to a common cultural origin:
Because the scientific study of Guanche mummies has been almost nonexistent, no analysis of the mummies found on the four islands has been published. Consequently, the following information is based only on the mummies discovered on Tenerife. There, the Guanches appear to have used three different methods for mummification:

(1) Internal organs were sometimes removed (this may have been reserved for individuals who were members of the highest level Guanche society).

(2) Special substances were sometimes used to embalm the body: soil and stone, various kinds of vegetable matter, and fat solids.

(3) Sand was stuffed into some mummies. (SOURCE: Conrado Rodriguez-Martín, "The Guanche Mummies." In Mummies, Disease, and Ancient Cultures by Aidan Cockburn, Eve Cockburn, and Theodore Reyman. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998.]

The Egyptians also removed organs and placed them in special baskets or receptacles for the recognition and assimilation by the gods; they used similar matters for embalming, including vegetable matters and fats, though the Egyptians used incense as well; rocks or sand were used to stuff the mummies.

An additional similarity occurs in the practice of entombing the dead, once thought to be an exclusively Egyptian phenomena which is arguably linked the with Guanche practice of burying their dead:

No matter which method (or combination) was used, a Guanche mummy was most likely dried out in the sun first. At the end of the process, the mummy was wrapped in animal skins, such as goat skins; kings received 10-15 skins, other individuals received many fewer. Then it was placed in a cave on a special mummy board. Finally, a stone wall was erected around the mummy. These factors (drying, cave burial, wall) also helped insure that the mummy would be preserved. (SOURCE: Conrado Rodriguez-Martín, "The Guanche Mummies." In Mummies, Disease, and Ancient Cultures by Aidan Cockburn, Eve Cockburn, and Theodore Reyman. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998.]

It is not presently known whether the Guanche used sarcophagi to bury their mummified leaders though this is an interesting possibility which could be borne out by further archaeological exploration of the Canaries.


http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html

The Religion of the Egyptians Indicates an Origin in the Western or Canary Islands of the proto-Guanche


It has been documented that though the Guanches buried their dead in caves unlike the Egyptians, the Guanches shared a belief in mummification, the principles and methods of mummification similar to the ancient Egyptians, and that they built step-pyramids with an east-west orientation or axis, alike the practice of the Pre-Dynastic and Old and New Kingdom Egyptian dynasties. Arthur Kemp notes that:

Charms and magical prayers were collected into a book and paid for by the living to put into their tombs - a sort of insurance policy for a successful resurrection in the hereafter. This book made up what is known as the "Egyptian Book of the Dead." (White History, Arthur Kemp, http://www.white-history.com/hwr8.htm)

The Guanche, too had inscription upon their mummified dead, in their now-extinct language. Kemp further goes on to state that:

Egyptian religion of the time was primarily concerned with the achievement of life after death. The practice of mummification was started on the basis of a myth that the God of the Nile River, Osiris, had been murdered by his evil brother, Seth. According to the myth, Seth cut Osiris' body into pieces. These pieces were however gathered together by Osiris' grieving widow, Isis, and re-assembled, thus resurrecting Osiris.

The Nile God then became the first mummy, and every mummified Egyptian became a second Osiris. (White History, Arthur Kemp, http://www.white- history.com/hwr8.htm)

It is unknown what part the theology of resurrection played in the life and religion of the proto-Guanches and Guanches; yet the fact that they practiced mummification indicates an affinity for the belief in a life after death as important and codified as in the life-in-life. The late Guanche culture worshipped the sun-god Mencey; although their distant forebears on the greater Canarian island before the end of the last ice age circa 13000 BP (when much of the Northern Hemisphere was under ice fields and more land existed above the seas than today throughout the world), European or African continent may have had other belief systems.

In A Berber solstitial marker earlier than the 16th century on Gran Canaria Island, Spanish writer Jose Barrios Garcia cites the following about the beliefs of the ancient Guanches and their similarities to the more advanced Egyptian beliefs that may have eclipsed their knowledge in the centuries after the hypothetical first founding of Egypt by the proto-Guanches:

...showing what I think to be a solstitial marker at the top of the most important religious mountain of the island [Gran Canaria]. Other research in this field deals with the astral religion of this people and their concept of soul, including the ancient Canarians considering themselves as sons of the sun. (Barrios Garcia)

It is well-known by historians that the ancient Egyptian pharaohs also considered themselves sons of the sun and used the flying, winged sun Atum as a symbol of their journeys in this life and into the afterlife. They considered the sun to be the father and watcher of their civilization and their people and an important marker in their spiritual and intellectual journeys, nourishing the Nile river and all of the animals and plants of their land; in a metaphysical sense they would not have the ability to comprehend the vastness of the stars that cited in their astronomies and agricultural tables if it were not for the magnificence and the practical presence of the sun in their daily lives.

The religious hierarchy and culture of the Guanches was sun-worship based and their islands were divided into cantons alike the ancient Egyptian nomes:

The social organization of the ancient Canarians was quite an advanced one, as the stage achieved by the natives was far beyond that of a purely tribal society typical of prehistoric cultures. The territory of the islands had been divided into districts recalling cantons of Switzerland. At the head of each district there was a local king. These rulers, called "Reynos" by the Spanish, exercised their power with great authority and wisdom. Their title was "Guayres" in the native speech of Gran Canaria, "Menceyes" in that of Tenerife, "Altithai" in Lanzarote and Fuerteventura."

(The "Altithai" is an extremely important word because it is definitely pre-greek and is pretty much pre-phoenician and explains the 'Alda' prefix as a 'Alti' type word it is at least contemporary with Malaga names and is considered a pre-celtic pseudo Basque i.e. sea people language. Eskimo's have been known to use words like this form showing its archaic quality. The Menceyes confirms the next stage linguistically after Althi words or Atl-Atl's as a 'water, doublet word'. Menceyes is not necessarily Spanish in Canaries because in Pre-Dynastic Egypt that word was floating around Harpooner clans who carried a ancient tradition that dated back to the Azilians???) [The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part II cont.
http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary2.htm]

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html

The Land of the West

The Egyptians used two hieroglyphs to designate the spoken term foreign land, or set. . The first or set was drawn like a three-pronged crown or a straight line curved upward and fully around to forum three peaks and two valleys. The second or amentet was identical to the first but had two islands or separated peaks above the two outside prongs, and a small smoke plume to the left of the outer left prong; what appears to be indicating a volcanic explosion above an island area. Set or Amentet hieroglyphs had two meanings: Set meant underworld or foreign or mountainous land; Amentet meant West or Land of the West. (Budge, E. A. Wallis, "Egyptian Language," Routledge & Kagan Paul Ltd., London, 1966.)

Since there are no volcanic activities in Egypt, and due to their masterful comprehension of astronomy and construction, they must have realized that true west could only be in one cardinal direction; from the Nile River delta across the coast of North Africa. yet there are not volcanic areas in the Western Mediterranean until one reaches the volcanic areas of the Canary Islands. There are volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean throughout the southern Aegean and the isles of Crete and Sicily, among others, but while there is no evidence of a proto-egyptian civilization on the isle of Sicily, the links between the Cretans and ancient Egyptians have been well-documented (including the cultural and linguistic similarities between the Pre-Dynastic Era Egyptians and the inhabitants of the semi-legendary Colchis in northern Anatolia) and it is submitted that during the flood migration of the southeastern Europeans circa 7000 BP, these Caucasian peoples settled throughout the islands of the Eastern Mediterranean and therefore may have contributed to the settling of lower Egypt - but than is true north, and not true west.

Yet anthropological evidence indicates a mixed settlement of Caucasian types into lower Egypt circa 7000 BP, and the post-Cro-Magnon, apparently neolithic or even copper metal-working Guanche (evidence of copper mining in the Balkans circa 7000 BP) are not of the same ethnic type as the Colcheans, described by the ancients.

Furthermore the direction of the eastern Mediterranean isles are north of Egypt, not West; and even if the ancient Egyptians faced the direction of the rising sun and considered that their cardinal north, they still would recognize that the opposite direction of the suns setting would be toward the Atlantic, and the setting sun of Amenta, or the Land of the West. It is perhaps no coincidence that the Guanches also built pyramids and laid their dead on the East-West axis.

The writer R. Cedric Leonard is of the opinion that the ancient homeland of the kings of Egypt was even further west of the Canaries, in the legendary place assigned by ancient and classical writers and historians as Atlantis:

Now the "Land of the West" would be a natural Egyptian name for Atlantis. The Atlantic Ocean was referred to as the "Western Ocean". Did Manetho translate "foreign land" from this glyph? If so, we probably have ourselves a reference to Atlantis in the writings of Manetho. There were no mountains in Egypt, yet this glyph represented a mountainous land to the west of Egypt.

That the glyph set also represented the "underworld," also fits, since this is the land where the sun shines after it has set (no pun intended) on the land of Egypt. It was believed in popular Egyptian mythology that the sun passed through the underworld on its way back to rise once more in the east. (Ancient Egyptian Writings, http://www.atlantisquest.com/Hiero.html)

The proto-Guanche were sailors; it is posited that they and their isles could also have been the original references of the term Amenti spoken in Pre Dynastic Egypt.

Anthropological Data: The Racial Qualities of Early Egypts Inhabitants and Leaders

Nordic peoples continued their exodus from the West and southeastern Europe, entering Egypt at the time of the great Indo-European migrations from the Black Sea Basin circa 5600 BC, Nordic peoples such as "Ginger" settled the Nile River Valley and laid the basis for what was, by 3000 BC, to become the first Egyptian Dynasty. (Kemp, White history).

An archaeological example this migration of Nordic caucasians similar to the proto-Guanches racially is Ginger. This neolithic man was found among others of his kind and it is further cited that:

Racially speaking, the inhabitants of Egypt at this period in time were divided into three groups. Skeletal evidence from grave sites show that the original White Mediterraneans and Proto-Nordics were in a majority in the area - a well preserved body found in a sand grave in Egypt dating from approximately 3000 BC, on display in the British Museum in London, has even been nicknamed "Ginger" because of his red hair - a racial trait only found in persons of Nordic ancestry. (Kemp, White History)

By approximately 5000 BP, the period of neolithic colonization of Lower Egypt by the Nordic and other European stock had become a concrete society; and with the conquering expedition of Nar-Mer circa 5000 BP, the neolithic era of Lower Egypt became the historical citation of the first Old Kingdom dynasties of ancient Egypt.

A common argument is to define the type of racial qualities of the pharaohs of Egypt; Caucasian being the rule until late in the last century of our era, for a number of reasons which have come to the academic arena regarding the identity of the most well-documented ancient Western civilization to date, ancient Egypt. Though by the time of the historically-youthful culture of the classical Greeks, when compared to the vast age of the Egyptian, many Egyptians were identified as being of woolly hair, most of the early leaders and inhabitants were known to be Caucasian, and this can clearly be seen in the Nordic features of many early Pharaohs, Viziers and commoners, well through the rein of King Tutankhamen (who died when he was 18 and reined circa 1350 BC) nearly four thousand years after the colonization of Lower Egypt by the nordic seafarers who we may call the proto-Guanches.

Blacks and Semitic-speakers were commonly slurred against and demonized in popular Egyptian art and pharaonic art to be found throughout the various complexes of the pharaohs; these artefacts include the dog-attacks against black slaves; the military expeditions against the Nubians to the south of Egypt, the black and semitic caricatures bound upon the walking-sticks of pharaohs; and the caricatures of blacks and semites painted upon the insoles of the sandals of a pharoah. It may be that the Exodus story of the Western Bible reflects the Israelite version of a culturally Egyptian, ingrained antipathy toward Semites or Hapirus (nomads).

Other arguments based upon the random sequencing of egyptian skull measurements
point to an entirely hamitic or racially mulatto ancient Egypt. Yet important evidence from an anthropological study points to the contrary:

Frédéric Falkenburger compiled and analyzed skull measurements from 1,787 Ancient Egyptian male skulls and divided them into four main groups giving the following results: 36% negroid; 33% Mediterranean; 11% cro-magnoid; 20% of individuals not falling in any of these groups, but related to either cro-magnoids or negroids. (Source: "La Composition Raciale del' Ancienne Egypt," Anthropologie vol. 51, 1947)

That data is not explicit in the time period and location of the skull measurements nor can we deduce from those obscured details the socio-cultural dynamics of 'ancient Egypt' as defined by the extent of that study, even if those remains are from a particular class of economic segment of society. Some studies of the racial propensity of the Egyptian populace are further supportive of a Mediterranean (i.e. perhaps related to the ancient Iberians, Cretans or Sardinians) rulerships and majority of the population in the Northerly part of the country (Lower Egypt):

The British anthropologist G.M. Morant produced a comprehensive study of Egyptian skulls from commoner and royal graves from all parts of the Egyptian lands and times. His conclusions were that the majority of the population of Lower Egypt - that is in the Northern part of the country - were members of the (now virtually extinct) Mediterranean White subrace. In the south (or Upper Egypt) this population pattern was repeated but this time showing a certain percentage of Black admixture (reflecting the proximity of the Nubian settlement). Significantly, Morant found that with the passage of time, the differentiation in skull types between Upper and Lower Egypt became less and less distinct, until ultimately they became i indistinguishable - the surest sign of the absorption of the White subrace into the growing Nonwhite mass. (Race, John R. Baker, Oxford University Press, 1974, page 519).

It furthermore does not emphasize the integral cultural importance of the proto-Guanche donation of Pharaonic rulership; noting that a very high percentage of Egyptian rulers and pharaohs from the Pre-Dynastic to the end of the New Kingdom were of Nordic stock and did not descend from the black-haired and fair-skinned or swarthy-skinned Mediterranean subrace, common to the ancient Cretans. It was these hypothetical proto-Guanches from the West, led by Thoth, who brought with them a religion similar to that of the Nordic ruling elite of Lower Egypt.

By the time of the Ruler Nar-mer the Lower Egyptians, arguably under the descendants of the proto-Guanche had conquered Upper Egypt and the keys to controlling the Nile Rivers course through the entire plateau of what is now modern-day Egypt; and by extension they conquered the dark-skinned mulatto Nubian peoples who lived near it, utilizing them as slaves and Hapirus and merchants and skilled craftsmen.

There is no evidence of semitic or black kingship in Egypt, as opposed to the more southerly enemy kingdom of mainly Negroid or mulatto Nubia (which often supplied slaves of war to the victorious Egyptians armies) as pharaohs until the end of the empire - until circa 800 BC when Egypt was arguably, in name only and the religious tradition begun by the post-Cro-Magnon and Nordic 'Guanche' sea-faring founders from the West (Amenti) (the founding dates for the predynasty period are dated anywhere from 4000 to 5000 BC) - the land of the god of knowledge Thoth - had all but disappeared into the mass of nonsensical cults and inter-racial cohabitations that produced a faux-Egypt ripe for plundering after four thousand years of continuous pharaonic history and civilization.

The author of White History, Arthur Kemp: March of the Titans goes on to state that, After passing under Ethiopian, Assyrian and Persian rule, Egypt was finally occupied in 325 BC by the Greek Macedonian Alexander the Great (whose tribe was one of the original Indo-European invaders of the Greek peninsula). Thus the great and venerable pharaonic civilization was all but extinguished, even under a brief renaissance by the culturally Greco-Roman Ptolemies in the later classical Roman Empire.

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html

Hamitic Infusion into Arabs, Berbers, later Egyptians and Black Slaving

As black (and white) slavery was common in centuries past in the Western portion of the old Europe, West Asia and Africa there have been numerous eras available for racial interbreeding/miscegenation; Phonecian, Roman and Arabic and Ottoman Eras are all probabilities but also the Spanish Italian and Portuguese slave trades to the new world; they may have used Sicily as a base for negro slaves in small numbers of intermarriage; rape or out of wedlock births may have resulted. Also there is a negro level of genetic material in North Africans and Arabians which indicates a similar pattern of enslavement of the blacks dating to perhaps the founding of the Egyptian Predynastic era when the caucasians and Nordic sea-farers founded their kingdoms along the Mediterranean areas. The nubians in the south were first contacted later for slave labor in increasing amounts over the consequent centuries.

The Arabs also received black slaves in historical-time and the development of inter-regional trade between Arabia, the Levant in general (including Phonecia, Assyria and Israelites) and India as well as southern Africa as there was the aboriginal australo-caucasian dark-skinned dravidians. a proto-australoid remnant population in southern India and perhaps on the coasts of Western Asia. Negroid intermixture in these areas of Arabia from two socio-cultural directions including Africans and Australoids into the Hamitic mixture and also the Nubian Caucasian-Negroid intermixture as has been discussed of caucasians and blacks - vide the green-eyed Watusi peoples of the northern reaches of north-central Africa.

Proto-Guanche Explorations in the Mediterranean

The evidence speaks to the broader historical evidence of a sustained and dynamic succession of white Caucasian sea-faring kingdoms from the eastern Mediterranean (Minoans (dark white Mediterraneans), Mycenaeans (Nordic white), Egyptians) through the middle of the sea (Sicily, Corsica, Sardinia, mixtures of Greeks, dark-Mediterraneans or Iberians, Etruscans, Iberians and perhaps Basques, respectively due to any preponderance of RH negative blood in those countries) to western Mediterranean (North Africa - Amazight or Berber, Iberian, Basque, Celtic, Guanche-Canaries, British Isles) over thousands of years from the neolithic period of Europe and the Mediterranean - a seafaring nation or nations of caucasians advanced enough to begin these colonies across Europe and into North Central and South America simultaneously.

The proto-Guanches are again highlighted as the transferring race of this nation or nations and were found in a severely devolved societal state by the Spaniards, centuries or millennia after their colonies (including in Spain millennia before).

Moreover even today the Egyptians culturally do not believe themselves blacks but whites and Egyptians - though it may be a legacy of the Arab invasion - this cultural tradition may date to the first civilizational-meme of Egypt being a white colony of Proto-Guanche descendants of Cro-Magnon of (western Atlantic isles dwelling) Atlanteans (whose descendants may have been the Sea-Peoples who attacked their long-lost cousins millennia later during the rein of Rameses II. Note that portraits of Rameses II portray Caucasian features including straight (not woolly) hair, long, straight nose, even jaw and a high, straight forehead; King Tutankhamen was cited as having reddish hair and Nordic body features.

Could it be the Pre-Dynastic founders of Egypt - nordics or Mediterranean Caucasians - have been coming on the sails of the founders, their ancestors the Atlanteans - some thousands of years before, who built the Sphinx, Osirieon, Great Pyramid of Gizeh - which were later attributed to Khufu (circa 5000 years before present) - the racial descendent of the Amenti-dwellers of the west (i.e. post-Atlantean Cro-Magnon proto-Guanches)? The hypothesis is outside the bounds of this scholarship at current time but raises interesting historical potentialities.

Proto-Guanche Explorations to America

The asiatic Indians of Central and South America, traditionally referred to as the indigenous peoples of the New World, although increasing evidence is pointing to a multi-cultural pre-Columbian New World of varying ethnic Asiatic groups as well as Caucasians and proto-humanoid beings of more archaic age, referred to the Columbians as quetzalcoatl, referring to the plumed serpent-god of the heavens which would return in the form of a white, bearded man in the year 1519 CE (by the calendar of the Europeans of the time); this date was venerated by the Aztecs in Tenochtitlan as an eschatological date and preparations were made by the court astrologers of the palace of Montezuma for their return. Other tribes of the New World in both Central and South America also venerated these wise, bearded white men for their previous incarnations and flying canoes which had brought culture, peace and prosperity to these regions in the remote past.

Yet it is possible that the voyage of Columbus was pre-dated by other Europeans explorers; scholars have made the speculation and evidence for Leif Ericcson and the Nose colonies of Vinland circa 1200 CE; the Welsh King Madoc circa 1200 or 500 CE depending on the archaeological data interpretation; the Irish Monk Brendan circa 500 CE; and perhaps earlier Irish, Basque, Roman, Cartaginian, Celtic and Phonecian-Israelite voyages to the New World, thereby establishing a permanent and continuous East to West cultural drive and expanding many historical horizons of the abilities of the ancient ancestors of modern Western civilization.

The author Kemp explains his research indicates the sea-faring ability of the Guanches and their interactions with the voyage of Columbus:

In fact Columbus' starting off point was the Canary Islands, where he obtained supplies and water on Gomera, the island next to Tenerife. The Guanches on Tenerife in 1492 did not permit Columbus to land on their island - they were not impressed by the physical appearance of the bearded Europeans, who looked like the Guanches themselves.

When Columbus and the Europeans who followed in his wake landed in the Americas, they were welcomed and initially worshiped as gods, since the beardless Indians they encountered believed that the Spanish belonged to the same people as the legendary founders of their civilization, bearded men from across the Atlantic Ocean.

According to the Aztec and Olmec (Central American Amerind) legends, their god, Quetzalcoatl, had Nordic features (eyes and hair color) and a beard. This god came from over the sea and taught the Amerinds how to raise corn and build structures. [Kemp, Guanche Type Pyramids Found In Mexico, http://www.white- history.com/hwr6a.htm]

There is further archaeological evidence that the ancient cultures of the Mesoamerican New World, predating the Aztecs, Mayas and perhaps the Olmecs (who themselves had rather Semitic-appearing features including beards, long noses and black hair).

As the proto-Guanche were noted seafarers in classical and ancient times; it is possible that the tall, golden-haired and fair-skinned peoples called the quetzalcoatl, or the culture-bringers of the asiatic Indians of Meso- and South America, were indeed proto-Guanches or Egyptians working with Guanches, or Egyptians who were related the the post-Cro-Magnon Proto-Guanches that traveled from the Canaries Islands as a stopover point to the New World and the sailing currents of the Gulf Stream from the southwest coast of Spain and modern-day Cadíz (ancient Ibero-Phonecian name Gades, or That Way) along the Atlantics Canaries Stream, to the Caribbean and what is now modern-day Northern Brazil.

Such are the archaeological remains of temples resembling Egyptian and perhaps Guanche stone work on the basins and sea floors in the Caribbean Sea from the Yucatan to Cuba and Bimini. Leonard cites the following evidence concerning the proto-Guanche-Egyptian architecture of the New World:

Finally, I couldn't help but notice the similarity between the Egyptian glyph for "temple" and an actual stone-walled building among the underwater ruins of the Bahamas. Near Andros island (on a shallow underwater shelf) is a rectangular ruin made of stone. Its walls are approximately three feet thick. Some investigators have dismissed it as the remains of a pen for storing conch shells. To them let me say (read my lips), you don't build storage pens for such items out of stone, using perfectly rectangular complex patterns, with walls three feet thick! Compare the following: one from Egypt and the other from the Bahama Islands.

Various researchers, including myself, have noticed the striking similarity between the floor-plan of the ruin near Andros island and the Mayan "Temple of the Turtles" located at Uxmal, Yucatan. So now we have Egypt, the Bahamas, and Mexico.(Ancient Egyptian Writing, R. Cedric Leonard, http://www.atlantisquest.com/Hiero.html)

Summary

Islands of prehistoric Nordic populations remained all over the world until the early years of the last century, from the Santa Catalina Islands off of southern California, to uncharted stone ruins in the jungles of Brazil, the red-haired Caucasian mummies of Peru and Easter Island, and the great plains (the mummified Si-Te-Cah and Lovelock Mummies of Utah and Nevada), west and northeast (the fair-headed Indian tribes of the Algonquin, Mandan and Cherokee) of the North American continent; travelers reported meeting aboriginal populations of nordics in these places, often matching the same description as the Guanches, proto-Guanches and archaic Cro-Magnons.

With increasing interest and archaeological and historical data, scholars can expand and detail the history of these noteworthy Caucasian explorers and possible founders of Ancient Egypt, whose history is now being uncovered from its buried past.

(...to be continued)

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-06-2006
.../...

Pyramids in Canary Islands

Archaeologists and authorities scoffed when a local newspaper published an article claiming to have discovered mysterious step-pyramids on the island of Tenerife. Just more agricultural stone terraces they said, such as are common throughout the Canaries.

But Thor Heyerdahl thought differently. Dr. Heyerdahl, who has done extensive research on the pyramids of Tucume in Peru, was intrigued by photos of the site, and on visiting the valley of Guimar to see for himself, he was no longer in any doubt. These were neither terraces nor random piles of stone cleared by the Spaniards, as some had tried to explain them away. They were painstakingly built step-pyramids, constructed according to similar principles as those of Mexico, Peru, and ancient Mesopotamia.

Six step pyramids were discovered in 1998 near Guimar, a town on the eastern shore of Tenerife Island, about 40 kilometers (24 miles) south of Santa Cruz de Tenerife - the Canary Islands. They are rubble-filled with facings of black volcanic stone and are the result of multiple episodes of construction. There are six step pyramids, reaching a maximum height of about 12 metres.

The main complex of three pyramids were found to be astronomically orientated with the sunset of the summer solstice. Stairways ascend from a level plaza to the top of each pyramid, where there is a flat summit platform covered with gravel. The stairways are all on the west wall, suggesting a ceremonial purpose, because someone ascending them on the morning of the solstice would be directly facing the rising sun.

Spain's Canary Islands off the northwest coast of Africa hardly seem a place for pyramids, but there seem to be six of them on Tenerife. The inhabitants have generally ignored these dilapidated piles of black volcanic stones. However, one perceptive native described them to Thor Heyerdahl of Kon Tiki fame and a leading proponent of cultural diffusion across all oceans.

The Canary Islands had been part of the route Columbus took to the Americas. He stopped in Tenerife for provisions in 1492. The Guanches on Tenerife in 1492 did not permit Columbus or any other Europeans to land on their island. They were not impressed by the physical appearance of the bearded Europeans, who looked like the Guanches themselves. But when Columbus and the Europeans who followed in his wake landed in the New World they were welcomed and initially worshipped as gods, since the beardless Indians they encountered believed that the Spanish belonged to the same people as the legendary founders of their civilization, bearded men from across the Atlantic Ocean.

Evidence lead Heyerdahl and others involved in the project to believe that these pyramids may be remains from pre-European voyagers who sailed the Atlantic in ancient times, and may have possibly forged a link with the pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas. They were neither terraces nor random piles of stone cleared by the Spaniards, as some had tried to explain them away. They were painstakingly built step-pyramids, constructed according to similar principles as those of Mexico, Peru, and ancient Mesopotamia. He is not sure why they were built.

Heyerdahl persuaded a Norwegian businessman to buy the site, clean up the debris of centuries and found a museum. One of the 'black' pyramids has now been restored, but some experts are still unconvinced. However, recent excavations under one pyramid have yielded artifacts identified with the Guanches, the pre-Spanish inhabitants of Tenerife.

The six pyramids in Tenerife are quite small, like training exercises for those in Central America. They are found near Guimar, a town on the eastern shore of Tenerife Island, about 40 kilometers (24 miles) south of Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Long dismissed by locals as mere piles of rubble, Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl turned up and declared that they were indeed pyramids, not unlike those in Tucume, Peru that he had been studying.

Far from being piles of unworked rubble, every stone was turned with its flat side out and placed together by stone masons.

With slopes of the volcano Mt. Teide at their back and facing the Atlantic, the edifices are precisely aligned according to the sunset on the summer solstice, as are other sacred structures in different parts of the world.

Carefully built stairways on the west side of each pyramid lead up to the summit, which is not a pile of stones, but a perfectly flat platform covered with gravel, as though for ceremonial performances and/or sun worship.

The stones were not weather-worn, rounded boulders, such as farmers had found in the fields, but sharp fragments of lava, and some of the corner stones had been trimmed.

Archaeologists from the University of La Laguna were contracted to do test excavations of a ceremonial platform between two of the pyramids. As predicted by Dr. Heyerdahl, they found that rather than being a random pile of stones as they had expected, it was built of blocks, gravel and earth.

Skeptics had to admit that this was definitely some kind of ceremonial architecture. Yet some still refused to admit that such impressive structures could have been built by the Guanche, the original inhabitants of Tenerife, and suggested that they might have been constructed by the early Christian conquistadores as a time measuring device to know when to celebrate the Catholic festivities of St. John.

The Canary Islands are a popular solution to the location of Atlantis, based on their location west of the Mediterranean, and their mountainous terrain ? they are part of a volcanic archipelago with marine trenches as deep as 3,000 metres and mountains as high as 3,718 meters above sea level.

Archaeological findings suggest that the original inhabitants were Berbers who arrived from north Africa around 200 B.C. However, some early navigators reported the Canarians as being a race of tall, blond-haired, blue-eyed people, perhaps suggesting northern European or Atlantean origins.

http://www.crystalinks.com/pyramidspain.html

Among the original inhabitants of the Canaries many were fair-haired and bearded, and probably related to the Berbers who inhabited the coastal areas of North Africa before the Arab conquest. Is it possible that long before the 15th century, people of the same stock as those who settled the Canary Islands also sailed the same route along the Canary Current that Columbus took to the Americas? Columbus' starting off point was the Canaries, where his ships got supplies and water on Gomera, the island next to Tenerife. The Guanches on Tenerife in 1492 did not permit Columbus or any other Europeans to land on their island. They were not impressed by the physical appearance of the bearded Europeans, who looked like the Guanches themselves. But when Columbus and the Europeans who followed in his wake landed in the New World they were welcomed and initially worshipped as gods, since the beardless Indians they encountered believed that the Spanish belonged to the same people as the legendary founders of their civilization, bearded men from across the Atlantic Ocean.

The priority is to preserve the pyramids, which were slated for destruction to make way for urban development. Two of the smaller pyramids, which were partially damaged in recent decades, have also been restored.

A historic building at the site has been restored to house a museum. The exhibits will present the evidence and arguments for ideas about the spread of culture and ideas in ancient times, including examples of cultural parallels in art and other archaeological materials from across the oceans, models of ancient watercraft, and illustrations of stepped pyramids from around the world.

The second floor contains the FERCO headquarters and an archaeological library.


http://www.ferco.org/ferco_pyramids.html



The Mysterious origin of the Guanches
From: http://www.atlan.org/articles/guanches/ (the present article should be read in conection with the one entitled "Guanche Language Derived From Dravida?", which also figures in the present page. Both are an abridged version of a far vaster work of ours on the Guanche problem.)

The Guanches are the mysterious natives of the Canary Islands. They were just about exterminated by the Spaniards when these invaded the archipelago at the turn of the 15th century. Tall, blond and blue-eyed, the Guanches have long intrigued the anthropologists, for blond natives are rarity. According to the reliable Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Guanches "are thought to have been of Cro-Magnon origin... and had a brown complexion, blue or gray eyes, and blondish hair" (See Fig. 1).

Indeed, the Guanches are deemed to be related to the Berbers of neighboring Morroco, who are, likewise, tall, blond and blue-eyed when unmixed with the Arab majority. Other specialists, however, believe that the Guanches are related to the Celts of Western Europe, the early realm of these races. No matter what, the Guanches represent a unique opportunity of studying the early peoples of this region so intimately connected with Atlantis and the Garden of the Hesperides.

Isolated in their islands, the Guanches were prevented, until the advent of the Spanish, from sexually mingling with other races. So, they preserved their pristine Cro-Magnon genetic traits in a more or less pure fashion until that date. But, as we said, the Guanches were massacred by the Spaniards, and their remainder mingled heavily with the invaders, so that they essentially inexist today. But the blond, blue-eyed, tall stock has been preserved in part, and can still be seen in many individuals. As is known, blond traits are dominated by dark ones, and tend to disappear from the population. But they survive unseen, and may return in certain individuals called "recessives", who combine the proper genes.

Furthermore, the Guanches mummified their dead, and this material can be studied by the researchers, particularly concerning traits such as blood type and racial characteristics. This strange mode of disposing of the dead — which the Guanches shared with the Polynesians, the Egyptians and the Mayas — has been mooted out by several authorities as indicating a close affinity among these distant nations. The Guanches also left some sort of alphabetic inscriptions which have yet to be studied, along with their pottery and peculiar ruins. All in all, the archaeology of this most remarkable people is far from satisfactorily researched.

Many researchers have pointed out the resemblance of the Guanche natives with the Cro-Magnons and, particularly, with Cro-Magnoid types of regions such as those of Muges (Portugal) dating from the Mesolithic (c. 8,000 BC). Similar groups have been noted and studied Portugal, Spain, France, England, Sweden and Northwest Africa, precisely the realm of the Celto-Germanic and the Berber races.


Are the Canaries the Remains of Sunken Atlantis?
Many Atlantologists have proposed that the Canary Islands are the remainder of a sunken Atlantis, being the lofty volcanic peaks left behind when the lost continent foundered. However, the Canary islands rise directly from the deep ocean floor, from a depth of some 3,000 meters below the surface. Indeed, they are a part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, having been formed by submarine volcanoes at the end of the Tertiary Age (circa 2.5 million years ago).Their lavas consist of basalts and trachytes, the typical material of submarine, non-explosive volcanism typical of seabottoms.

Due to both their age and their origin, the Canarian volcanoes can hardly be invoked to account for the conflagration that wiped Atlantis off the map. Instead, this type of basaltic, submarine volcanism is nowadays perfectly well understood geologically speaking. Such volcanoes result from the upwelling magma that forms the Continental Plates, according to the theory of Plate Tectonics, and are a feature of all oceanic regions of the world. Hence, the claims made by certain Atlantologists such as P. Termier, I. Donnelly, C. Berlitz and many others that the Canaries or the Azores, or the Madeiras are the remains of sunken Atlantis do not hold water at all.


http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm


Are the Guanches Atlantean Relicts?
As we said above, though we can be certain that the Canaries, along with the other neighboring Atlantic islands, are not the residues of a sunken continent that foundered in the region, we have yet to explain the mysterious origin of the Guanches. However, where smoke is, there is usually fire, and we cannot simply ignore the recurrent legends that link this people to Atlantis.

But if they are not Atlanteans left behind when their continent sunk, the only possible explanation for the mysterious origin of the Guanches is that they primordially came from somewhere else. But, whence? Certainly not from neighboring Africa, the realm of the Black Man. No serious anthropologist has ever maintained that the blond Aryans originated in Africa itself. The standing proposals for the origin of the Berbers and, possibly, the Guanches themselves, are that they came from Arabia, after crossing the Sahara desert.

But, to start with, no one is sure that the Arabs or, even less, the Aryans, originated in Arabia or Palestine, and their own ethiological legends affirm that they came from beyond the Indian Ocean. Moreover, the Sahara desert poses a formidable barrier ever since the end of the Pleistocene, and it is highly unlikely that it could be crossed by hordes of migrants, unstocked with the food and water required for the task.

The Guanches were held in perfect isolation from Europe and other Old World civilizations until they were discovered by the Portuguese and Spanish at the end of the 15th century. This separation dates from prehistoric times that far predate the ones of Plato and Herodotus, and even those of Homer and Hesiod. So, if Guanche legends indeed relate to Atlantis and its doom, we can be certain that the golden realm was no idle invention of Plato or other Greeks, but originated in a very ancient tradition, dating from the dawn of mankind. This is precisely what we aim to prove in the present work on the origin of the Guanches.

We start by reviewing the ancient traditions linking the Canaries to the Garden of the Hesperides and the Islands of the Blest, and progress into the modern proposals purporting to show that the Canaries and the other neighboring islands are the remains of sunken Atlantis. Finally, we attempt showing their rather direct relationship between the Canaries, Atlantis and the Garden of Eden, the legendary site of the origin of Mankind.

If our conclusions indeed prove to be right and survive the wellcome attack of the critics, the whole of human prehistory will have to undergo a major revision. Hence, the importance of inquiring on the origin of the Guanches and their possible connection with Atlantis. The mysterious Guanches provide the key to the riddles that surround the origin of Mankind, and are the "missing link" connecting the Mediterranean and other neighboring civilizations to the Far Orient and the Indies, the true site of the Garden of the Hesperides. This garden, also known as that of Eden, is the place where Mankind and Civilization indeed developed, according to the holy traditions of many nations, and not only that of the Bible.


Evening Isles Fantastical
Classical writers often mention legendary islands in the Atlantic Ocean in a way that closely evokes the legends of Atlantis. Homer mentions islands like Phaeacia, Scheria and Ogygia. The Argonautica, deemed to be prior to Homer's Odyssey, also speaks of legendary oceanic islands such as Aiaia, Thrinacia and Colchis. More than just delightful novels, these ancient sagas were indeed Sacred History, and were believed to derive from actual fact. The Greco-Roman traditions concerning the fabulous oceanic islands and their golden realms apparently derive from the far earlier ones such as the Epic of Gilgamesh of the Sumero-Babylonians or the Ramayana and the Mahabharata of the Hindus.

Many other classical authors also mention such fantastic islands of the ocean. This ocean the Greeks, ignorant of the other oceans, very naturally identified with what we nowadays call by the name of Atlantic Ocean, that is, "the Ocean of the Atlanteans". But when we read the ancient traditions closer, we notice that the fabulous islands of the Atlanteans were always placed "at the confines of the earth".

Moreover, the ocean in question is invariably described as "winy red" and is placed towards dawn and Orient. In other words, the ocean in question is the Indian Ocean, which the ancients called Erythraean, that is, "Red One". And Atlantis is the same as the Ultima Thule of the ancients, this being the name they gave to the "confines of the earth" which lay towards the Orient, in the Eastern limits of their world, and where they also placed the Pillars of Atlas, the twin and counterpart of the western Pillars of Hercules, in Gibraltar.


The Phoenicians and the Secret Route to the Indies.
The traditions concerning the legendary Atlantic Islands (or, rather, "Islands of the Atlanteans") were probably transferred from the Orient to the Occident by the ancient navigants and explorers such as the Phoenicians, the Minoan Cretans and the Etruscans. The Greeks had some knowledge of the ancient peripluses of the Phoenicians, the detailed accounts of the naval routes to such mysterious islands so often equated to the ones of Paradise and Atlantis.

In the desire to preserve the lucrative monopoly of their maritime trade with the Indies, the Phoenicians and their partners disguised their verbal maps under a veil of confusion intended to avert the possible competitors towards the wrong places and directions. It suffices to read such accounts, preserved in the writings of authors such as Avienus, Hanno, and Pytheas of Marseilles to observe the inextricable confusions that becloud the real distances, names and directions.

The same thing happens with the writers that speak of the Atlantic Islands in mythical terms. The accounts of authorities such as Herodotus, Plato, Diodorus, Theopompos and many others are no different from the accounts of the Odyssey and the Argonautica. They are full of allegories, metaphors, paradoxes and even downright lies that have led the experts to despair from ever making any sense out of them.

Such relates tell of seas riddled with clashing rocks, seamonsters and thorny sargassoes that dragged down the ships they caught, or in giant maelstroms and muddy shoals and doldrums that prevented the mariners from ever escaping death. They also tell of one-eyed giants and microscopic dwarfs, of strap-footed Titans and goat-footed satyrs, of terrible cannibals and of sorceress of all kinds. But some of these accounts were far more realistic and matter-of fact, and plainly alluded to real islands such as the Canaries and the Madeiras and, far more likely, to the Indonesian islands or even the Americas beyond.


http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

Midas and the Satyr Silenus
The ancients believed, as did Plato and Herodotus along with the Greek geographers that a circular ocean — the one they called "Outer Ocean" or "Atlantic Ocean", and which included what we now call the Atlantic and the Indian Oceans— surrounded the world then known, which consisted of Eurasia and Africa. The historian Theopompos, a contemporary of Plato, relates a conversation between the legendary King Midas of Phrygia and the very wise satyr Silenus.

The satyr, entrapped and rendered drunk by Midas, told him of an Outer Continent (the Americas?) that outlay the ocean and which was inhabited by a people twice the size and twice as long-lived as the ordinary mortals. One part of their continent was permanently enwrapped by a red mist and was drained by two rivers, the River of Pleasure and the River of Grief. Once, these giants crossed the ocean intending to conquer the ancient world. But once they saw the misery of our world, they realized that it was useless to pursue their plan, and retired to their world in disgust.

The story of Theopompos is extremely interesting, for it embodies the essential elements of the myth of Atlantis. To start with, the attempted invasion of the giants closely evokes the similar one undertaken by Plato's Atlanteans. Plato too alludes to the Outer Continent, the Epeira Ges that delimited the Ocean on all sides, and which can only be the Americas. The Atlantean empire was indeed worldwide, and certainly encompassed the Americas, whose name comes not from a hypothetical Amerigo Vespucci, but far more probably relates to that of the Celtic Armorica.1

In the version of Theopompos, the Atlanteans are confusedly equated with the Long-lived Ethiopians of Homer, Herodotus and others. The Long-lived Ethiopians, often described as tall, blond, blue-eyed giants of twice normal size, are a recurrent feature of the ancient Greek legends. More realistic historians such as Pliny and Solinus correctly place these blessed giants in the islands of Taprobane, that is, in the Indonesian islands. But others, perhaps ignoring the true meaning of the antique traditions, place the Islands of the Blest and their beautiful, saintly giants, in the Canaries and the Madeiras where we also encounter them in reality.


The Mirror of Illusion (Maya)
As we shall see further below, these ancient "confusions" were planned, and the blue-eyed "Ethiopians" of the Canaries and Mauritania were planted there as a virtual replica or "mirror image" of the real ones, the fortunate Ethiopians of Trapobane. Indeed the metaphor of the "mirror image" of Atlantis created by the Ethiopians of the Canary Islands and of the Berber coast of Mauritania is not ours, but figures in many ancient symbols and traditions. This tradition concerns the Mirror of Illusion, the characteristic attribute of deceptive goddesses such as the Indian Mayâ ("Illusion") and the Greco-Roman Venus.

The motif of the Mirror of Illusion occurs even in the Americas and, particularly among the Gnostics such as the Cathars and others. The Phoenicians indeed held that the Pillars of Hercules of Gibraltar were a "mirror image" of those located in the Orient, as some of their coins specifically illustrate. Interestingly enough, Maya (the male avatar of the Mayâ) is the Great Architect, the luciferine deity of the Gnostics and the enlightened civilizer of humanity. Maya (masculine of Mayâ) is also the builder of legendary Lanka, the city and capital of the worldwide empire that was the actual archetype of Atlantis. In Fig. 2, we show two Phoenician coins illustrating the true Pillars of Hercules in the Far East, and their illusory reflection in Gibraltar.

As we shall see further below, Maya, the Supreme Smith of the Hindus, had his Guanche counterpart in Guayota, the Supreme God of the Guanches, and in Lug, their Celtic counterpart. Such coincidences can hardly be random. So, the only possible explanation lies in diffusion through direct contact among the civilizations in question, that is, those of the Guanches, the Celts and the Indonesian Aryans, known to the ancients as the Pious Ethiopians of Taprobane.

The Pillars of Hercules of Gibraltar and the Garden of the Hesperides of the Canaries in the Atlantic Ocean are an illusion or mirage, a mirror image of the true Islands of the Blest, in Indonesia. The Atlantic Atlantis, variously placed in the Canaries, the Azores, Tartessos (Spain), Mauritania (Morocco), or Crete is a sheer illusion created by the clever ancients in order to distract and to disillusion the inquisitive profanes of ever finding the Lost Continent and the true site of Paradise. So are the ones of the Syrtis (Libya), the Bosphorus, the Armorican coasts of Brittany, the Irish Isles, and so on.


http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

The Ancient Conspiracy
The reader may wonder what proof do we have to substantiate our of a conspiracy of the ancients to hide the whereabouts of Atlantis-Eden? The ancients well knew the true site of Eden or, more exactly, of the ancestral Paradise whence we all came from, and which was the site where Mankind and Civilization first started. And they also knew that this paradisial region was destroyed by the Flood at precisely the date given by Plato, that of 11,600 years ago.

But they could not tell its true location, for this was the matter of the secret of the ancient Mysteries, and this divulgation was considered a grievous crime of profanation, often punished with death, as in the case of Socrates and, possibly of Plato himself. So, the true location of Paradise was only dealt in a sort of coded language based on allegories, riddles and puns that were intelligible only to the initiated in those secrets.

Well, the evidence we gave above is just a small sample of several hundreds of compelling evidences like the ones we present below and elsewhere. Our strongest evidences for Atlantis and its true location in the Far East are both geological and anthropological. They include racial characteristics, blood types, myths, traditions, customs, techniques, artistic motifs and, above all, the linguistic, cultural and religious affinities. The last two are just about the strongest and most unequivocal of all links between different nations derived from a single stock.

In an article parallel to this one we present the philological comparison of the Guanche language to Dravida, the sacred, pristine language of the Dravidian populations of India. As can be seen in that article, the two languages, though isolated from each other by untold millennia, are remarkably similar both in phonetics and in grammar. No serious linguist will idly dismiss the cogent parallels we present there, particularly as the linguistic affiliation of the Guanche tongue is an unsolved riddle so far.

For reasons of space and scope, these two articles are kept concise and non-technical. But even then, we believe that the evidence presented is compelling enough to convince all that take the trouble to follow them in detail. Moreover, as we just said, there are simply no viable alternative theories that explain the riddle of Guanche origins in a satisfactory way. In our view — which we argue in detail here and elsewhere — this people formerly lived in Indonesia or, more exactly, in the now sunken portion of it which now forms the South China Sea. When their land sunk away, at the end of the Pleistocene Ice Age, they were forced out by the cataclysm, and moved to the Canaries, possibly in the wake of other seafaring nations such as the proto-Phoenicians and proto-Cretans.

The Twin Ethiopias of Homer and Others
From earliest times — as instanced in Homer, Hesiod, Herodotus and elsewhere — the Greeks spoke of two Ethiopias placed at the two opposite ends of the world. One corresponded to the region near Gibraltar we are presently discussing, and the other one was located beyond the Ocean (Indian), in Taprobane (Indonesia). The idea of "burnt faces" (aethi-opes) connected with the Ethiopia is not indeed an allusion to the dark coloration of this people, but to the fact that they were expelled from their homeland as the result of the fiery cataclysm that sunk Atlantis away. This catastrophe was indeed caused by the giant volcanic conflagration of Mt. Atlas, which mythically "charred" their physiognomies. In reality, this darkening was the result of the admixture with the darker neighboring nations of Indonesia, precisely as reported by Plato and others.

Emigrating from the charred remains of their sunken continent — the formerly paradisial Land of the Dead that would later become the Islands of the Blest — the Canarians (and other Atlantean nations as well) moved to the opposite side of the world, where they would attempt to rebuild their lost Paradise. Hence, the twin Ethiopias of Homer and others, and the duplicity of Pillars of Hercules, of Mt. Atlases, of Gardens of Hesperia, and so on.

Even the Ocean that encircled the earth with its ring was likewise parted into two complementary moieties ascribed to the omnipresent Atlanteans. More exactly, it was parted into two parts, one which we now call Atlantic Ocean, as did the ancients, and an eastern half that had its name changed from Atlantic Ocean into Indian (or Erythraean) Ocean. This name, which means "red" in Greek, is the mystic name of the Atlantean peoples such as the Phoenicians, the Egyptians, and even the Guanches themselves. Indeed, the "Reds" are the Chams or Chamites of the Bible, a name not unconnected with the red races just mentioned and with that of the Guanches as well.2

http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

The Atlantis of the Orient
Many authoritative writers of antiquity place Mt. Atlas and the Atlanteans, along with the Garden of the Hesperides in the Far Occident, in the region of Mauritania and the Canaries. But no lesser authorities than Hesiod and Eurypides, among many others, place Atlas and his Pillar of Heaven in the Far Orient, at the extremities of the world and of the day, where we also find the other legendary islands associated with Atlantis and its foundering.

The Hesperides (or Atlantides) were the seven daughters and lovers of Atlas. Atlas, the Pillar of Heaven, was the personification of Mt. Atlas, just as his seven beloved daughters were the ones of the Seven Atlantic Islands that figure in many traditions, and which are no other than the ones of Indonesia. It is only natural that the giant would want to place his girls right next to the place where he stayed up the heavens, for carnal reasons, if not prompted by fatherly love. Hence, the Garden of the Hesperides of the Far Occident in an illusion not unlike the "Mt. Atlas" of Mauritania or its Canarian replica, the Teyde (or Teide) volcano.

The Mt. Atlas of Mauritania, the one we know under that name, is not indeed a volcano, and, hence, cannot at all explain the traditions concerning the conflagrative destruction of Atlantis and the fall of the former heaven when its Holy Mountain collapsed. If Mt. Atlas indeed collapsed — as volcanoes are wont to do after gigantic explosions — and if Atlantis sunk along with its environing lands, how are we to expect to find its mountain unscathed, as is the case of Mt. Teyde in the Canaries, and of Mt. Atlas, its Mauritanian counterpart.


Theopompos' Atlanteans and the Mysterious Hanebut
It is time to return to Theopompos and his cryptic Atlanteans. The "red mist" that beclouded the Meropean continent is another traditional feature that we systematically encounter in the legends concerning such mysterious regions. Ultimately, the dark "mist" is the smoke cloud that resulted from the volcanic cataclysm that destroyed Atlantis and which, indeed, blocked away sunlight, obscuring the entire region for a large time.

This darkening of the sun is a sad reality, well known to the inhabitants of the region of Indonesia, volcanically the most active in the whole world. In Hindu myths, the city associated with the cataclysmic explosion and the smoke cover is called Dhumadi. This name means "Covered by Smoke", in Sanskrit. This etym (or etymon or etymology) closely recalls the legend of Sodom and Gomorra, likewise covered by a pillar of smoke "that rose up to the very skies".

Indeed, Dhumadi was the archetype of Atlantis and, as we explain elsewhere, of Sodom and Gomorra and other such cities destroyed by a volcanic conflagration. In Egypt we encounter the same tradition under the name of the mysterious Hanebut. The name means, in Egyptian, "the Dwellers of the Misty Regions".

The Hanebut were a real people, and their region was frequently visited by the Egyptians, who traded with them across the ocean. As the Egyptians only sailed the Indian Ocean, it is clear that the region in question lay beyond that ocean, in the region of Indonesia. It was there that the mysterious country of the nebulous Cimmerians was located, as well as the Pillars of Hercules and, more exactly, those of Atlas as well. Plato places Atlantis just in front of the Pillars of Hercules. So do many other ancient authors, disguising its true identity under names such as Cimmeria, Hades, Taprobane, Cassia, Punt and Hanebut.


http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

The Celts and the Elusive Cimmerians
In Homer and others, such peoples that lived in perpetual, smoky darkness, were called Cimmerians. The Cimmerians or their equivalents are a recurrent feature of all traditions. The Germans and the Celts also spoke of such a misty region, which they called by the name of Nefelheim, "the Abode of Mist".

The Nephilim — the fallen Titans or Giants of the Bible, whose sin with the Daughters of Men led to the cataclysm of the Flood — in all probability derive their name from a radix neph meaning "nebula", "mist", as in the Greek nephele, the German nefel, the Sanskrit nabha, the Dravida nep, etc. Even in Egyptian we encounter the radix in the name of the Hanebut (or Hau-nebhu-t).

Homer (Od. X:508; XI:14) tells how the Cimmerians lived "enshrouded in mist and perpetual darkness which the sun never pierces". He places their region in Hades, beyond the Ocean, next to Mt. Erebus. Erebus is the very entrance to Hell, the terrible chasm left behind when Mt. Atlas foundered underseas, becoming a giant volcanic caldera.


The Celts are the Cimmerians of Taprobane (Sumatra)
The Cimmerians are deemed to be the ancestors of the Celts and the Scythians, two other races of blond, blue-eyed, gigantic Ethiopians. They are identified with the Cymry or Cimbri, a Germanic tribe which invaded Rome and almost defeated the empire at about 100 BC. The Cimmerians were deemed to have come from the Palus Maeotis, a legendary region often connected with the sinking of Atlantis (palus = "marshes", in Latin).

One of the triads of the Celtic Mabinogion tells how:


"Hu Gadarn originally came with the tribe of the Cymry to the Britannic Isles. They came from the Country of Summer, which is called Defrobani... They crossed the Misty Ocean (Tawch) and arrived in the Britannic Isles and Armorica, where they settled."

Here is direct evidence that the Cimmerian Celts (Cymry) indeed came from Taprobane (Sumatra), here misspelt as Defrobani. The Country of Summer (Gwlad or Haf) can only be situated at the Equator and can hardly be identified with the Hyperborean regions of the Far North, where this people also settled after fleeing their destroyed homeland. Hu Gadarn is the Celtic equivalent of Noah and of Aeneas, leading his people away from their destroyed Paradise, into the Promised Land.
Indeed, the Hyperborea whence the Celto-Iberians originally came is the realm of Apollo (the Sun), "the land beyond the Boreas". And the mythical Land of the Sun can hardly be believed to lie in the Arctic or, even less, in the Antarctic regions, as some authors will.

Actually, the Hyperboreans were held to live in the mysterious Thule, the divide of the world that lay beyond the ocean. And the word Ocean meant, for the ancients, the Indian Ocean, and never the Atlantic, which they never sailed. Thule is the same as the island of Long-Lived Ethiopians. And these Ethiopians are indeed the Hyperboreans, both legendary races being identical in being composed of tall, blond, blue-eyed Ethiopians. Both lived in the far off region of Taprobane (Indonesia), a place, the above authorities add, "which lies beyond the Aquilon".


Boreas Is Not Indeed the North Wind That Blows From The Alps
Boreas is not indeed the North Wind that blows from the Alps into Mediterranean Europe, but a figuration of the monsoon winds that blow in the northern regions of Indonesia. The name of Boreas given to the North Wind that blows in the chilly regions beyond the Alps is a replica, a "mirror image" of the true Indonesian archetype. The Hindus worship Boreas, the North Wind, under the name of Varaha (or Vayu), from whose name that of Boreas ultimately derives.

So, the mythical Hyperboreans, the mysterious "peoples that live beyond the Boreal winds" are not those who lived in the Alps, above Europe, but the ones who lived beyond the monsoon winds that blow in the northern coasts of Indonesia and nearby regions. This fact is attested by too many ancient authorities to be dismissed easily, except by solid contrary evidence

The reality of the North European Hyperboreans could never be established in realistic bases, and their postulation has only led to paradoxes and difficulties. But when we accept the assertions of Pliny, Solinus and other authorities such as the ones we have been quoting, everything starts to make sense. Besides, how could Apollo, the Sun god, make his abode in the gelid Alps, instead of the equatorial Indonesia, the true Island of the Sun of the ancients?


http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

Pliny, Boreas, and the Hyperboreans
Now, the Aquilon is the Latin name of the North Wind, the very same one that the Greeks called by the name of Boreas. Here, it is identified with the monsoon winds of the East Indies. Hence, we see that the true location of Hyperborea or Thule was the island of Taprobane, the true abode of the blest, long-lived Ethiopians. The passage of Pliny (Hist. Nat. 4:26) on the Hyperboreans is worth quoting:


"Beyond the Aquilon one finds a blessed nation called, according to tradition, the Hypeboreans. Among them, men reach an extreme age. Many marvels are told of this people. Some say that the hinges of the world and the limit of the course of the stars lie in their region... The country is bathed in sunlight and enjoys a pleasant temperature..."
"Discord is there ignored, and so is disease. People there do not die but from the satiety of living. After a festive banquet, full of the joys of old age, the one who wants to die jumps into the seas from a lofty rock. Such is for them the happiest way to die. One cannot doubt the reality of this country, described by many authorities."


Pliny, in the above passage, also adds that Hyperborea was the realm of Apollo and that the Hyperboreans sent, from the island of Delos, the first-fruits of their crops to Greece, to be dedicated to the Sun God. The descriptions of Hyperborea in the many authors mentioned by Pliny are indeed those of a tropical Paradise not unlike the Garden of Eden and the Islands of the Blest. When one pauses to ponder, there is only one place in the world that fits the description of Atlantis, of Eden, Aztlan, Atala, and of other such Paradises turned Hell. That place can only be the Indies, as can be surmised from the dozens of traditional accounts. A posteriori, this conclusion of ours is so obvious it hurts.

Apollo and the Hyperboreans
It is interesting to note that Plato, in his detailed description of Atlantis, makes an obscure reference to the lofty rocks from which the Blest Ethiopians used to throw themselves into the waves, in an immitation of the primordial deed of Atlas and Hesperus, who also fell from such a lofty cliff. Actually, these cliffs were the legendary Leucades, whose name is a reference to their being covered by the white bones of the dead who went by throwing themselves from their tops.3

Pliny's Hyperborea also evokes the description of the island of Emain Abalach (Avalon) in Celtic poems. There:


Treason is there unknown and so is sadness.
There no pain, no regret, no death, no grief,
No disease, no weakness, ever afflict anyone.
For such is the fortune of Emain.

Another a similar Celtic poem adds:


What a wonderful country is this one!
There the young never grow old at all!

What is to be retained from the above discussion is the fact that Avalon, Hyperborea, Thule, Taprobane, Eden, Paradise, Emain Abalach, the Garden of the Golden Apples, the Garden of Idun and so on are all one and the same thing. Their connection with the "first fruits" is an allegoric reference to the fact that Atlantis was indeed the very first site of human civilization, the same as the legendary Paradise or Garden of Eden.
These pleasant, luxurious gardens all lay at the extremity of the world which, from the Celtic perspective in Brittany, could only be the antipodal Indonesia, located on the side of the world opposite to their own misty islands. This Paradise was destroyed by a cataclysm, and they were forced to leave it, emigrating to the far Occident, under the leadership of Hu Gadarn, the Celtic Noah, the Judeo-Christian hero of the Flood.

The sinking of this realm is told in the legend of the Flooding of Ys, another central tradition of Celtic mythology. And their sunken Paradise became the Land of the Dead, the "Tomb of Glass" (Glastonbury) or "Island of Glass" (Ynis Wydr) that we encounter so often in their Celtic legends. This dismal Hades is the same as the Cimmeria of the Greeks, the Hanebut of the Egyptians, the Sheol of the Jews and the Nefelheim of the Germanic Nations.


http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

How the Guanches Got to the Canaries
Many writers who investigated the problem of the Guanches were puzzled by the fact that the natives of the Canaries detested the sea, and never sailed it at all. So, it is pertinent to ask, after them, how did the Guanches get to the isolated Canaries in the first place? The answer seems to be rather simple, after all. They were brought as passengers in the ships of seafaring peoples such as the Phoenicians, the Etruscans, the Minoan Cretans, and so forth. Indeed, the ancient records are full of references to the "ships of Tarshish" being used by passengers and migrants of several different nations.

When the White Ethiopians who survived the Atlantean cataclysm emigrated to the distant Occident in their ships — under the guidance of admirals like Aeneas, Hercules, Phoroneos, and Hu Gadarn and, perhaps, Noah, Canopus and Jason — they settled in colonies along the way, on every coast and every island that looked promising. The legends are certainly founded in actual fact, and these fleets of ocean worth vessels are the ones allegorized as the Ark of Noah in the Bible or as the Argonavis in Greek legends.

It was thus that Mauritania was settled by the Berbers, Lebanon by the Phoenicians, Crete by the Minoans, Italy by the Etruscans, the British Islands and Brittany by the Celts and, of course, the Canaries by the Guanches. Many of these emigrants were, as is usually the case, mere passengers who never knew how to sail or, even less, how to design and build sea-worthy ships strong enough to sail the open, rough ocean, a feat very hard to accomplish in antiquity. Such huge sailships — the "ships of Tarshish" of Biblical traditions — are attested from remotest antiquity, for instance in the Gerzean ceramics of pre-Dynastic Egypt, which date from about 5,500 BP or so.

In this way, the Guanches were stranded on the Canaries, and the enigma which has defied solution for millennia is naturally explained. The ancient peripluses like those of Hanno and Himilco relate similar expeditions and even the establishment of such insular colonies. Such is also the meaning of myths like the one of Aeneas and his fleet fleeing from the destroyed, sunken Troy or, also, of the Biblical relate of Noah and his clan repeopling the Islands of the Nations, and founding the different nations of mankind.

http://meta-religion.com/Paranormale/Atlan...he_guanches.htm

1 Many authorities refute the usual derivation of the name of America — originally applied to Brazil and South America — from the name of Alberigo Vespucci, whose name was later altered into that of Amerigo in order to comply with the fanciful etymology. Alberigo was an obscure scribe, and would hardly deserve the honor. The name of Armorica was that of the Brittany in Roman times. It is usually derived from the Celtic ar-mor meaning "over the seas". Many legends connect Armorica with the sunken realm of Ys, the Celtic counterpart of Atlantis.

More likely, the true origin of Armorica's name is from the Dravida ar-mor-ika, meaning "remains of the land sunken under the seas". The name of America, which the Conquistadores learnt from the American natives, likewise seems to come from the Dravida am-mor-ika, meaning just about the same or, more literally, "remains of the marshy land sunken under the seas". Interestingly enough, these meanings are rather close to that of the epeira ges (or "outlying land") of Plato and others, and which embodies the idea of a mountainous fringe left behind when the flatter land sunk away. This name, as applied to the Americas, was an extension of that of Indonesia, whose actual situation indeed corresponds to actual fact.


2 The "Reds" are one of the Hindu four castes, Brahmans (or priests), Kshatryas (or warriors), Vaishyas (or bourgeois) and Sudras (or serfs). These also correspond to the four primordial races of humanity, personified in the Bible by Noah and his three sons. In modern terms, these also correspond to the real four races of humanity: whites, reds, yellows and blacks, which are precisely the heraldic colours of the four castes (varnas = "colours").

The name of the Phoenicians derives from "red" (phoinikes) in Greek. The radix cham is of obscure origin, and is said to mean "black", as usually interpreted in connection with the Egyptians, who called their country Khamis or Khemis. But this is wrong, and the true etym is "red" or, rather, "candent", as in the Latin chama ("flame"). In contrast to what many authorities affirm, the land of Egypt is whitish, rather than black, due to the sand it embodies even in the irrigated regions. The idea is that the Chams, formerly white as the Guanches, were "charred" by the volcanism that destroyed their land, and became the Ethiopians, that is "the fiery faced" (aith-opes). But, as we already said, this darkening of the originally blond Atlanteans was the result of "too much admixture with mortal blood", as Plato discloses in his Critias.

Ultimately, the radix cham or, rather, kham or khem, derives from the Dravida, where it means "red", "fiery", "flaming", "gold". It designated the red races which formed the bellicose Kshatrya caste, and which was mainly composed of the Dravidian races. The name was also applied to the wild red dog of the Indies (Cuon alpinus), with which the Reds identified themselves. Hence, the fact that the Chamites were often equated to "dogs". The name was applied to the Canaries ("Isles of the Dogs") because of the Chams, rather than the dogs, as Pliny falsely alleges. Same thing with Khemis (Egypt), "the Land of the Chams". The very name of the Guanches derives from Guan-che or, rather, Kham-che, meaning the nation (che or ge) of the Chams". The reader interested in more details on this should consult our article on the Dravidian origin of the Guanche language.


3 The name of the Leucades derives from the Greek leukas, the feminine form of leukos ("white", "shiny"). Legendarily, their name is ascribed to Leukates, a boy who, desired by Apollo, threw himself from the cliff in order to escape the relentless persecution of the god. Sometimes, the cliff is directly associated with Apollo Leukadios, who had a temple at its summit. The Leucadian Rocks became famous as the place from which non-corresponded lovers or those wishing purification committed suicide, a ritual known as katapontismos. Leukates is the obvious twin of Apollo, the two being the aliases of Atlas and Hesperus, who also found a similar death.

The Leucades were also obscurely identified with the Elysian Fields, the Greek counterpart of Eden or Paradise and, more exactly, of the Islands of the Blest which are no other than Atlantis. It is interesting to note that the name relates to the radix luk- meaning "fiery","shiny","white", and which partakes of the name of Lucifer, Lug and other such luminous, fallen deities.

All such gods are invariably connected with Atlantis, and are said to inhabit volcanic peaks, which indeed deserve the name of "luminous". Such is the case of the Teyde volcano of Tenerife, whose name means "The Luminous One". Coincidentally or not, the fact is that the Teyde volcano is the legendary abode of Guayota, the luminous All-Creator of the Guanches. Guayota is the perfect counterpart of the above mentioned luminiferous gods, as well as of other chthonian, smithing gods such as Hephaistos and Maya, the great architect of Lanka. Lanka was the archetype of Atlantis, in Hindu traditions, and of all such fallen Paradises, including the Celestial Jerusalem.


(... to be continued)

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-06-2006
.../...



Guanche Language

In what follows, we provide linguistic evidence that the Guanche language is very likely of Dravidian derivation, and not indeed Hamito-Semitic, as usually stated. The present article is intended to be read in connection with the one entitled: The Mysterious Origin of the Guanches, see before. It is an extract of a vastly larger study of ours on this subject, which we are currently in the process of publishing. We would be delighted to discuss the matter with specialists or others who may be interested in it.

According to the Ethnologue Record, the Guanche language is affiliated to the Afro-Asiatic family. The language is now extinct, but several words and expressions are known and extant. Some authorities affirm a connection with the Berber tongue, a position questioned by many linguists.

Since the Guanches lived in almost perfect separation from Europe and Africa from very early epochs, their tongue provides a sort of "fossil" evidence for the very earliest form of the language spoken by the immigrating races that settled in Western Europe and northwestern Africa. Given the probable connection of the Guanches with the Celts and the Berbers, as well as other Aryan races, the problem of these Canarians assumes an enormous importance for the elucidation of human prehistory. Blond, blue-eyed natives are a rarity everywhere, so that the Guanches — who were still living in the Stone Age — present a fascinatingly unique field of study for anthropologists.

We have made the remarkable discovery that the Guanche language is closely related to the Dravidian family of languages of south India, both in grammar and in phonetics and etymology.



This fact directly confirms our theory that the tall, blond, blue-eyed Aryans who later formed local races such as the Guanches, the Berbers, the Celts, and the Germans, indeed came in from the Indies, the true site of Atlantis. If this tentative discovery of ours is supported by further research and stands, a revolution will be on order for archaeology as a whole, and for linguistic archaeology in particular.

Ethnologists generally admit that languages afford the strongest evidence of close affinity, not necessarily ethnic, between different civilizations. The a priori probabilities of random coincidences between several words in the two languages under comparison are essentially nil, as we demonstrated elsewhere. Of course, random coincidences can always occur, and the evidence has to be corroborated by other independent proofs, as is the case with our proposal. But the probability of detailed coincidences such as those of the word lists we present below being purely random are unthinkably small, and must be explained in some other way.

A nation can adopt the language and even the religion of their conquerors. This was the case of the Guanches themselves, whose only language nowadays is Spanish, and whose official religion is Catholicism. But the coincidence proves that, at least, a close contact occurred in the past, and this has to be explained by viable theories. A mistake that that is often committed by amateur linguists is comparing just a very few instances of words between the two languages or, conversely, of making a more substantial listing of words of several different, obviously unrelated languages.

Random coincidences and borrowings can certainly occur, and the comparison has to be rather exhaustive in order to prove affiliation or former direct contact. Moreover, the respective etymologies must agree rather perfectly, and so must the corresponding pronunciations. Spelling is generally immaterial, particularly for illiterate tongues or for different alphabets. But the phonetic changes have to conform to certain fixed rules and to laws such as the ones known to linguists and philologists.

Guanche Word List
In what follows, we compare the several extant Guanche words to their Dravidian correspondents of identical etymology. The list is extensive, but not exhaustive. However, it can be considered representative, as it comprises all words that we could obtain in this first draft. The Dravidian equivalents were obtained from the excellent A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary of T. Burrow and M. B. Emeneau (Oxford, 1984), the classical work on the matter.

We also attempt the interpretation of some Canarian toponyms and anthroponyms, a notoriously difficult task, given the obscurity of the two languages in question. But our results are rather encouraging and compelling, as can be seen by comparison. As we already said, the reader should pay attention to the phonetic correspondences only, disregarding the actual spelling, as a result of the Dravidian alphabet being different from the Roman one adopted for the Guanche language.


Guanche Glossary and Comparison with Ancient Egyptian Words or Roots

Ahemon "Water" in Lanzarote and Hierro (cf. Berber "Aman")

Ataman "The Sky" in Tenerife (cf. Wolof "Asaman" and Arabic "Sama")

Chamato "Woman" in Tenerife (cf. Taureg "Tamet")

Faican "High Priest" in Gran Canaria (cf. Wolof "Fayda" meaning "much esteemed")

Tagoror "Meeting" in Tenerife (cf. Tuareg "Tahrut" meaning "Society")

Tibicena "Dog" "Evil Spirit" in Gran Canaria (probably from the old African linguistic background)

Zeloy "The Sun" in Palma (cf. Berber "Azil")

Ben = One

Lini =Two

Amiet= Three (compare with Egyptian HMT= Phallus, three lines, earth and sky symbol hieroglyphs and meaning three in Ancient Egyptian)

Arba= Four (also Acodetti)

Cansa = Five

Sumus = Six

Sat = Seven

Tamatti= Eight

Acot = Nine (also Alda Morana, meaning "One less than ten")

Marago = Ten

Achich =Son

Adarg = Shoulder

Ahemon = Water

Ara, Axa = Goat

Cuna = Dog

Taharenemen = Dry Figs

Almogaren = Temple

Ataman= The Sky

Falcan High Priest

Arba Four

Cansa= Five

"Ajeliles Juxaques Aventamares" meaning "Run away! They are coming to take you." Tomas Arias Marin y Cubas, Historia de las Siete Isles Canarias, origen, descubrimiento y conquista, an original manuscript-A.D. 1694.

These words belonging to the dialect spoken by the native Gomera are a proof that the language was of Berber extraction. In the reconstruction made by Mr. G. Marcy, a well known expert in Berber languages, the above mentioned sentence would be: "Ahel I-bes, huhak sa aben tamara-s", with the same meaning.

[The Early Inhabitants of the Canary Islands, By Alf Bajocco, 1965 Part II cont.
http://geocities.com/MotorCity/Factory/2583/Canary2.htm]

http://www.robertschoch.net/Guest_Articles...e_guanches.html


Guanche - Dravidian Intercomparison

Guanche
Guanche Meaning
Dravidian Etymology

Achaman
Heaven
ox-am-an ("the upper expanse")

achanó
year
Ajja-no ("time division")

achicaxna
plebs, people
Acchi-sagina ("lowly crowd")

achimencey
king's relative" (nobles)
acchi-menkay ("relatives of the king")

Achit!
Long Live!; Hail!
Akchi, Agi-t- ("Hail")

Achimayek
Mother, Grandmother
Acchi-mayi-ek ("Great Mother of God")

Achoron
Earth
achurun ("marshy land"), ag-alam ("earth")

ahico
leather shirt
ayi-kov ("breast cover") 1

ahof
milk
ay-ubi ("breast food" = milk)

amulán
lard, fat
Am-ullu ("liquid fat")

ahoren
barley bread (gofio)
av-ari (av = "baked", ari = "barley")

añepa
scepter, royal staff
anne-pal ("royal staff")

ara
goat
(k)ara , ar ("goat")

armenine
pastures, grasslands
aram-meyni ("grazing field")

banot
spear, javelin
ihpa-not ("sharp javelin")

beñasmen
crop, harvest feast
panna-as-men ("ripe fruit cropping")

bucio
conch trumpet
bug- ("flute"), pucci ("spurt of sound")

cancha
dog
kunchi, kenchi ("red dog")

ere
pool, pond
eri (pond)

ganigo
pot, jar
kann-iku ("water vessel")

gofio
bread, flow
(g)uvi-u ("parched sweet cake")

goro
corral
gor-o ("sheep pen"); kora ("corral")

guan
man
gand ("hero", "male")

guanamene
prophet, seer
kan-amani ("father seer") 2

Guanar-teme
"King of the Nation"
Gan(d)-ak-tempe (idem)

Guañac
"Country", "Nation"
Gan(d)-ak ("Land of the Heroes")

guanil
loose cattle
kan-iyal (idem)

guayca
leather legging
kay-ka ("leg protection")

gujon
vessel, ship
kuccham ("mast")

hachichey
peas, beans
a-chik-kay ("edible beans")

Haña
sheep (herd)
ana, kana ("flock", "herd") 3

Guayota
the Devil
Kay-ota ("the Fiery Lord") 4

irichen
wheat, grain
arichi ("rice", "grain")

Magec
God (the Sun)
Mangeh ("Bull" = Shiva) 5

mencey
king
menkay ("king")

mocan
a type of fruit
manka (= Skt. mankan = "mango")

Quevehi
"Your Highness"
Cevvai ("Your Highness")

Sigoñe
"Captain", "Chief"
Cek-kon ("Head Leader")

tabone
knife (of obsidian)
tarpuni ("knife", "blade")

Tagoror
Council, Senate
Takkor ("worthy persons", "senators")

Tajaraste
Name of a dance
takcha-arasati ("royal dance")

tamazanona
food (barley mixed with ground meat)
tam-acchana-anna ("food made of ground grain and chopped meat")

Tamaragua
"Good Morning"
Itam-eruka ("Auspicious Morning")

tamarco
goatskin (dress)
atta-makar ("goat skin")

tano, taro
barley, grain
(t)aru ("grain", "food")

tenique
flexible mace
tanka, doni(k) (mace)

toya
fern (edible sprouts)
tai ("tender edible sprouts")

teme
"king"(?)
tempe ("hero", "chieftain")

Vacaguaré!
"I prefer to die!"
Vaka-k-ari! ("I choose to die!") 6

xerco
sandals, shoes
cherpu ("sandals", "shoes") 7

xaxo
mummy, corpse.
chacchu ("corpse")


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_guanches_2.htm

For further comparison of Dravid and Guanche languages, Please see the following:

http://faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/bronze/guanche.htm


END biggrin.gif

Prairyearth- 09-06-2006
Holy Smokes DreamWalker,
Thanks for sharing this information you discovered with us. Wow! I'm going to read all of this...see what the words contain within and be back to discuss...
Thanks Again, smile.gif
Prairyearth

tojil- 09-07-2006
in lak'ech ala k'in>-@^^^^^^^^^%%%%Blessings of this day to all ,a day of justice and that light may be shown upon our path."the maya are not based on race ,but consciousness" a good article on our origins in the Maya Cosmo -vision may be found at[URL=www.kachina.net/~alunajoy/98may]

Prairyearth- 09-07-2006
DreamWalker, tojil and all,
I found those articles very interesting. Especially in discovering more toward "Who we were" and "Who we are" leading up to the "Now." As I read through the material, more questions emerged, and nudged me on to go in search of more information such as for starters;
History of Slave Origin (whoa, lots to ponder there!) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_trade

History of Canine (more to ponder)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog

History of Pyramid culture - researching this particular question is a bit different, as there is so much information written on separate pyramid cultures at different geographical locations around the world. There doesn't seem to be a general pyramid people of the world history all summed up, however, I found a few;
http://www.answers.com/topic/pyramid

History of Star Culture origin;
Hey, what's up with these Purple People? sleep.gif I still learn something new every day. rolleyes.gif Awesome. smile.gif http://www.geocities.com/soho/lofts/2938/histcult.html

This was interesting as well;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika

Ancient history of Mining;
Hmmm, this was interesting to run across;
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/iams/allabout.htm
There is much written on the history of mining and metallurgy, often involving slavevery. (above)

History of Dragons and serpents;
Information on this subject surfaces more and more all the time. Check this one out;
http://www.isidore-of-seville.com/dragons/

Prairyearth

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-07-2006
Hi Relatives,
there are a lot of questions to answer, and there's an easy way to try to find general solutions, as pyramid peoples, ice peoples, mountain peoples or no matter what else. Well, it just kills the diversity.
Anyway, while trying to answer our COMMON questions, some x-treme opinions can help to awake our minds. This is the case of the articles that I posted before.

But, what it is REALLY interesting is the FACT of the EXISTENCE of the Guanche People, that really seems to be the CLUE to a general understanding of our history, and that has remained alive untill our present days - even if we have not too much clues to understand their culture-. It seems to me that Guanches are the forbidden step in our history and that it can explain a lot of forbidden histories.
With respect,

DreamWalkerAwake

DAN 1- 09-12-2006
Dear Prairyearth and Dream Walker Awake. WHEW! This area I will be digging around in and responding to for months if not years. This is wonderful.

Not only do I have strong general interests in these matters, but important specific interests as well.

As a contributor to this string, it will be my goal to add to the "tying together" of these sections of knowledge, heritage explorations and species manifestations. This will be where my "Gher" will be and where I will "live" in Ghostchild for quite some time.

Thank you Prairyearth for opening this fire of our new Ghostchild Camp. To me it is very valuable. Dream Walker Awake, your branching addition to this area has opened up new and important areas of my personal quest for knowledge. The information here is meat and work for my Soul.

Thank You both for this.

I would begin with a question that goes straight to the "useful" heart of these matters for me:

Dream Walker Awake? Do you know a member of the Guanche People or a Canary Islander that could represent authority over what remains of the Guanche Language? A descendant of the Guanche People that has much of them in his or her veins and DNA? If so, I seek contact for permission to adopt and use words of their language.

Respectfully, DAN 1

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-13-2006
Dear Dan1,
Guanche culture is still very alivein the Canary Islands, even after some centuries of reppression and persecution. If you go there you'll still find these blonde/blueyed people. Although if the blood is really melted, the percentage of Rh- and blood "O" group is very high in the present population.
Today the Guanche memory is of a great value to them, and every woman or man will talk about it with a deep emotion. Those I know are common people with who I have a friendship.
But I suppose you are looking for some "more official" contacts than I have, so I can propose these links and, afterwards, if you need some help or some translations english/spanish it will be an honor to giveyou my help.

It seems to me that you're interested in the ancient languages, so the best person to contact is:
Ignacio Reyes García
"Foro de Investigaciones Sociales", San Martín, 75 - 7ª izda. 38001 S/C de Tenerife, Islas Canarias (Spain).
And also:
Buenaventura Perez Perez
Centro de la Cultura Popular Canaria
http://www.centrodelacultura.com/ (in this site you can contact him)


Also about language (the webmaster of this site can help):
http://personal5.iddeo.es/anaissi/indice.htm
http://www.lomoapolinario.org/anavegar3/ca...rio_guanche.htm

There'sa lot of general info also at:
http://www.canariastelecom.com/personales/almogarenguanche/
http://www.mundoguanche.com
http://www.guanches.org/
http://webpages.ull.es/users/jbarrios/pdf/...h=%22guanche%22

Let me know if you need some more help.

DWA

Prairyearth- 09-13-2006
There are also some great petroglyph similarities between some glyphs found on the Canary Islands with some of those found in Ireland. Photos courtesy;

http://www.megalithomania.com/irishgenius/zSessKilgreen1.htm

The first is from Fuente de la Zarza, La Pallma, Canary Islands. The second is from Kilgreen Ireland.

user posted image

user posted image

DAN 1- 09-13-2006
Thank you Dream Walker Awake and Prairyearth.

Dream Walker Awake? May I correctly assume that the Ancient Guanche words listed in your previous message are still used on Canary Island? This could present a problem to me...a dilemna. Presently, I am under mandate to adopt only words from extinct languages and peoples. This is a matter of respect for living cultures.

Also, may I correctly assume that these words are fragments of the very Ancient "Cro-Magnon" language? It has never occurred to me that Cro-Magnon words were still being used today. This is astounding...and very precious. The possibility that these words were once spoken by the Cro-Magnons is intensely exciting for me. Before now I had no idea and no hope that any still exsisted.

Here is what I believe about the Cro-Magnons. They are what is known in certain circles of belief as the "Blue Men". They came 500,000 years after the "Andonites" had first "Evolmutated" on Our Mother Earth. (About 990,000 years ago) The Andonites are the first Human Beings here. Certain of the Andonites are today called "Neanderthal". Their most direct descendants are the Eskimo Peoples.

The Blue Men or Cro-Magnons gradually pushed the Neanderthals into tighter and tighter pockets on the planet...until they were themselves put under territorial pressure by the mixed descendants of the Nodites and Adam and Eve, known as "Andites". Its all about succeeding waves of peoples pouring out of Mesopotamia.

Anyway. Until now, as I said above, I had no hope of there being any knowledge left of Cro-Magnon (Blue Man) words. I have four Andonite or Neanderthal words, but until now nothing from the succeeding Cro-Magnon times.

I will have to take this to committee, before I take the next step to seek "use permission" of these words.

Isn't it strange how there is always a new twist that causes adjustment?

Prairyearth? Those are great pictures. They tell me that there may have been Cro-Magnons in Ireland before the Celts. Perhaps the Tuatha De Danaan were Cro-Magnon. Thank you for showing me this. What do you think about the pictures? What is your interpretation?

Off I go. Will be back.

Respectfully, DAN 1

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-14-2006
Dan1,
Guanches were living in Canary islands untill 500 years ago and, obviously, they used their language. It was a non writting language, and its knowledge was transmitted from one generation to the next.
With the arrival of spanish, most of them were killed, but not all of them. A new language was imposed -spanish - but, as it has been occurring for centuries, the ancient language survived. Not completely, but some words that are still in use at present days. Obviously, toponyms are of Guanche origin (Taoro, Teguise, Tacoronte, Tijarafe...), but also a lot of words that today use the people in Canary islands. You'll find a lot of information about in the websites i posted before.
So YES, this ancient Cro-Magnon language is still used. smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif

DreamWalkerAwake- 09-14-2006
Dan1, a little bit more of information about Guanche toponyms and Guanche words still in use at present days...

-----

Written by Francisco García-Talavera

Introduction

The old toponymy is one of the ethnographic, linguistic and archeological fountains that can provide the knowledge of the prehistory of Canary Islands.

Unfortunately, what has arrived us has been an ensemble of names offensively hispanicized, and with severe errors of trascription, which have kept being transformed throughout the time and that does very difficult to assimilate to any of the current mazigios dialects (bereberes), for they are also very Arabized.

With this work we intend to bring to light some aspects of the old Canarian toponymy, fundamentally statistical-comparative, that they can contribute towards ving a new approach to the origin of the Canarian culture. And we say Canarian culture because every time we are more convinced that the settlement of the islands was made by North African carrier people of a common culture: the tamizight, which afterwards kept evolving isolatedly in the islands and suffering exogenous contributions throughout two millennia. However, it remained that root and that cultural substratum in all the islands.

Material and Method

The guideline that we have followed to carry out the work has been, in the first place, the consultation and contrast of the "check-list" of toponyms, elaborated by different authors. Among the old ones we stand out to Berthelot, Chil and, especially, to Bethencourt. Of the modern specialists Wölfel deserves mention separately for his immense compilation work. Also the silent work of field that come carrying out eminent linguists and ethnologists as Díaz Alayón and Lorenzo Perera among others is outstanding. We can not forget the valuable contribution to the Canarian toponymy of the geographer Leoncio Afonso, of the professor Francisco Navarro, of the mazigiologues Pablo de Luca and of the Buenaventura Pérez. Alsotonotice the contributions of M. Ragman, J. Suárez, L. Fernández and other collaborators.

In the second place, we have gone to the obliged consultation of the available topographic maps, mainly basing ourselves on the Geography of Canary Islands, of recent publication (1990) and in the topographical leaves of the Mapping Agency of the Army of scales 1: 50.000 y 1 : 25.000, for the minor toponymy. After the examination of these last, the great quantity of errors of trascription, situation, etc. that have is noticed clearly, fruit of the ignorance of the land and of the Canarian words on the part of those who carried them out. Errors that started to take place since the moment of the conquest, when some European town clerks tried to transcribe and to represent with letters, the sounds that our Guanche ancestors transmitted to them in their language.

Hard work meant the selection and contrast of all the information, having to discard numerous repetitions or of false mazigia origin.

Statistical analysis

We, the Guanches in the island of Tenerife, menceyatos, a total of 545, located in our corresponding place of the insular geography, started by fabricating a map of distribution of toponyms.

When observing this diagram we see that the menceyatos that more toponyms contain (65%) are those of the South (Güímar, Abona, Adeje), which coincide with the "sides of peace", in which the native population was seen little displaced, continuing for long time with their uses and habits. On the contrary, the "menceyatos of war" have very few Canarian-mazigios toponyms (20%), it being confirmed this way that in the best lands (Tegueste, Tacoronte, Taoro, Icod), where almost all the conquerors and settlers were dated, the new-culturalization was faster, being ploughed up the date with names given by the new owners. Another data that we can extract is the relatively high number of Guanche toponyms in the mountainous massifs of Anaga and Teno (Daute), as well as in the central range (Imobach), in concordance with the isolation provided to the population taken refuge there (the elevations) with by the orography.

Likewise, we fabricate a series of statistical pictures with the Canarian-mazigios toponyms of each of the islands, which appear in the geography of Canary Islands to scale 1:200.000 and in the topographic maps of the army to scales 1: 25.000 and 1:50.000; the total number of Guanche toponyms located in the different islands is of 1407; and for last, the Canarian-mazigios toponyms mentioned by Bethencourt Alfonso in 1991, that add 2.714.

The statistical analysis indicates that the island of Tenerife has the greatest number of mazigios toponyms (1237, 45%), of which we have located 545, and that the island of La Palma has the smallest (134, 5%). It surprises also the scarce number of toponyms in the island of Gran Canarian (224, 9%), especially if it is compared with the islands with smaller surface, as La Gomera (310, 11%) and El Hierro (256, 10%).

The percentages are maintained in proportion to the surface, in Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Lanzarote, Gomera and El Hierro, but it is not like this in Tenerife (upward) and La Palma (downward). Curiously the North area of these two islands, especially La Palma, offers a scarce number of mazigios toponyms, so we can extract interesting etno-historycal conclusions.

As for the relationship between the toponyms located in the maps 1:200.000 of the Geography of Canary Islands (greater toponymy) and the topographical sheets 1:50.000 and 1:25.000 (minor toponymy), we will say that these last represent approximately between the 40 and 50% in all the islands, less in Gran Canaria (27%) and Fuerteventura (54%).

The reading of these data makes us think in two important questions:
a) the minor toponymy is in serious danger of disappearing, of there the enormous importance of the encomiable work of field that is being carried out by some ethnologists and linguists that go over our geography asking them to the oldest peasants for the names of mountains, cliffs or rooks.
cool.gif the index of rooting of the Canarian-mazigia toponymy is high in Gran Canaria (little difference among greater and minor toponymy in Tenerife, La Palma, La Gomera, El Hierro and Lanzarote), and low in Fuerteventura. It is in this island where it charges greater urgency the rescue of those valuable toponyms that are about to disappear -under the enormous migratory pressure that is suffering- and that so much can provide the ethnohistory of Canary Islands. Work that fortunately has been carried out or is being carried out in other islands.

We elaborate a relationship of toponyms (311) that, in its different variants, exists in two or more islands, and that they represent, if we consider 3000 as approximate total number, around 10%. Among them we find a surprisingly high number of pancanary (136) that contrasts with the scarce twenty that until now had been mentioned. Most of these toponyms mazigios-pancanary, match with the amazigh culture, and refer to the Nature: geomorphological accidents, zoo and phyto-toponyms, etc., ... water, volcanoes, mountains and chess rooks, vegetation, edge of cliffs of mountains and horn, among others. All that notes towards a common origin of the first inhabitants of Canary Islands, which can not be another than the mazigia Africa (Berber).

Likewise, we provide a proposal of translation of some Canarian-mazigias voices comparing them with its equivalents of the different continental dialects, where we observe that it is a great correspondance with the tamahak (Tuareg), consequence, perhaps, of a minor pollution due to the isolation of the desert. We also enclose a relation of some insular toponyms with its continental equivalence.

Conclusions

Two basic conclusions:

a) the existence of a common language to all the islands -with some dialects variants, product of the insulation and sporadic exogenous contributions- of indubitable amazigh root.

cool.gif even the high survival of the Canarian-mazigia population after the conquest, after almost 600 years of aculturación and subsequent loss of the original language, at thepresent day still remains more than 1400 mazigios toponyms located in Canary Islands, which represent 15% of the total, surpassing even to many countries of the continental Tamazgha, where the arabization has caused greater destructions.

CANARIAN|CANARY-MAZIGIOS TOPONYMS PLURIINSULARES
(KEY: TENERIFE (T), LA GOMERA (G), PALMA (P), HIERRO (H), GRAN CANARIA ©, FUERTEVENTURA (F), LANZAROTE (L).)


ABACHE (T,F), ASERO (T), ECERO (H), AZERÓ (F), (P)
GUSA (L), TINCOSA (H), ARGUSA (T), ©, ADAAR (T), ADARA (G), ADAR (P) DARA (H), ENADAR (P), ADEJE (T,F,C), GUAYADEQUE ©, AGAETE ©, AJACHE (L,T), ARACACHE (T), GUINIGATE (L), BINJACHE (F), (T,H,G), AGANA (G,L), TINAGANA (H), ARGANA (L), TIRAJANA ©, AJANA ©, AGAN (T), CHIÑAGANA (T), TAGANANA (T,P,F), TINGANAR (H), GUARAGANA (G), AGANADA (L), AGANDO (G,F), ARAGANDO (H), GANDO ©, AGUERE (T), VENEGUERA ©, GUERIMES (F), MESGUER (F),
AJUÍ (F), ARAGUYGO (T), TEGÜÍS (T), CHAGÜIGUI (G), GÜIGÜI ©, BENTAJOY (F),
TAME, MANINIDRA ©, MANCAFITE (H), MANENIGRE (L), MANAE (F), MANDAYA (T), (T), TIMANFAYA (L), ADAYAMAN (P), ADAMANCASIS (P), AMURGA ©, CHAMORGA (T), AMULGA (G),ANAGA (T), ARINAGA ©, NAGA (F), GUARNAGA (G), TINACA (H)
ANAMBRO (T), NAMBROQUE (P), ARAFO (T), TENAFO (H), AFUR (T), ARGUAYO (T), ARGUAYODA (G), ARUCAS ©, UGA (L), UGAN (F), TAPAUGA (G), GUARASOCA (H), UCANCA (T), TINOCA (C,H), UQUEN (P), ARUGA (T), ARURE (G), TEROR ©, ARUREA (T), IRURE (T), ASOFA (H,T), AYOSA (T), AYOZE (F), BENIJOS (T), BENIJOSA (P), VENJO (T), BENTAIGA ©, BENTAICA (H), TIGAIGA (T,G), CHACAICA (T), TAIGA (L), TIANICA (H),BINTO (H), BENTO (T), BUJAMA ©, BUJAME (T,F), JAMA, BEÑAJAMA (T), UJAMA (P), OJAME (F), TAJAme (F), (T),
CHIBESQUE (L), CHINBESQUE (T), ISQUE (T), LESQUE (F), ISCAGUA (P), ISIQUE (H), ISCAGÜE (G), TABANESCO (H),CHIGUERGUE (T), CHEJERGUE (G), EGUERGUERE (T), TEGUERGUENCHE (G), GAUGE (P), GUERGUE (T), CHINGUARIME (T,G), TINGUARAME (F), CHINOBRE (T), VENIJOBRE (P), MANINUBRE (F),
CHIRIBICHE (T), ATERIBITI ©, TIBIRIBI (H), CHIRICHIBITO (F),
ERESE (H,G), ARASA (T), ERQUE (T,G), GANEGUIN (F), ARGUINEGUIN ©, GANIGUE (T), GUIRGUIN (T),GARACHICO (T), GARAFÍA (P), GARAJONAY (G), GALDAR ©, GARAÑAÑA (T), TAGARA (T), GARAPA (F), TANAJARA (H), GUAGARA (L),
GORO (T,C), GORONA (P,H), GORAN (H), TAGORO (T), TAGORA (G), JOROS (F,P)
GUAMA (C,T), ARGUAMA (T), GUAMASA (T), GUELMES (P,C),GUIDE|LEADER (T,C), TEGÍA (L), TENEGUÍA (P), TENEJÍA (T), AREGUÍA (F), GÜIMAR (T), AGÜIMES ©, TENEGÜIME (L), GOIME (L), TEGOIME (H), JÓIMA (G), BENTEGÜIMES (P), GURUGÚ (H), GORGO (T), TURRUJÚ (L), HERJOS (T), JERJO (P), CHERJO (T), ICOD (T,G)
ICOR (T), TIGUR (F), TIGOR (H), TIGURAME (F), IDAFE (P), NIDAFE (H), AFE (L), TINAFE (T), CHIRAFE (F), MACINTAFE (L), IFARA (T), FARES (H), FARA (T), CHAFARIS (T), CHAFARIZ (L), ARAFARA (T), FARACAS ©, (F), ISORA (T,H), ISORE (P), JAGUA (T), JAGÜE (G), JANDÍA (F), CANDIA (H,T), GANDÍA ©,
JINAMAR (C,F), GINAMA (H), GINIGINAMAR (F,L), INAMA (G), CHINAMADA (T), JUSIGINAMA (F), AUTINAMARA (P), MAJAN (G), NICE (T), CHIMAJA (T), TAMAJA (F)
MALLET (P,L), MOGAN (C,T), MUIMA (G), TEMUIME (L), TABORDO (F,T), CHACABORDO (T), TACORONTE (T), TACORON (H), ORONE (G), WOODEN PEG (T), TACONCHE ©, TACOTE (P), ARCHACO (T), CHACORONE (T), TACOJAIRE (F), TAGORON (L), TAFIRA ©, CHAFIRAS (T), ARCHIFIRA (T), CHÁFIRO (F), TÉFIRO (L)
TAGAO (F), TAJAO (T), TAMADUSTE (H), TAMADUCHE (G), TAMADITE (T), TAMADISTE (G), TEDOTA (C,T), TEDOTE (P), ADUTE (T), TAMAIMO (G,T),
TAMANCA (P), MANCÁFITE (H), ÁFITE (L), TAMARACEITE ©, TAMARASEITE (T)
TAO (L,T), ARTAOS (T), TAORO (T,C), TAUCE (T), TAOZO ©, TARGA (G), TARTAGA (T), ARGAGA (G), TAGAGA ©, TECINA (G), TECINE (H), TEGUEDITE (L,T)
TEGUESTE (T,C), TEJESte (F), IGUESTE (T), TAGASTE ©, YOU CHOPPED (H),
TEGUISE (L,T) AGUISE (F), TEQUESE (H), GISE (G), TEJEDA (C,H,T), TEJINA (T,H)
TEJUATES (F), TEJEHUATE (H), TENEFE (C,F), TENERIFE (T,H), TERIFE (F), ARIFE (L), ARCHEFE (T), TENO (T,F), TESEGUITE (L), TESEGUETE (H), TESSERA (H), CHISERE (T), TENESERA (L), TETIR (F), TETIRA ©, TIAS (G,L,F), TIGADAY (H), CHIGADAY (G), TIGALATE (P), TEGALA (L), TIJARAFE (P,T), CHIRAFE (F), CHIMI (F), TEMISA (G,L), TEMENSA ©, CHIMICHE (T), CHIMISAY (T), TIMIJIRAQE (H), GUARATEME (T), (T,P,H,F), TINCER (T), TENAZAR (L), TINIZARA (P), ANZARA (T), TINDAYA (F,T)
TISCAMANITA (F), TISCAMANISCA (G), TUINEJE (F), CHUINEJE (T), TUNTE ©, TÓNETE (T), TACUITUNTA (H), ZONZAMAS (L), YE (L,T), YEJE (T), YEGUE (P)

PROPOSAL OF TRANSLATION OF SOME TOPONYMS CANARIAN-MAZIGIOS

ABACHE è EBET (Tam) = that it raises quickly
AGAETE è AKACC (Kab) = cliff
AGUERE è EGUEREW (Tam) = lake
AMGHAR (Tam) = the patriarch, the head
AMANAY è AMENAY (Tam) = place of assembly; the omnipotent one
GUSA, TINCOSA è AKSU = place setting of fresh grass
ARUCAS, UGA è TUGGA = prairie, pastures
BENTAIGA è WI-N-TA-EKKAD = those of the big rock
BENIJO è WIN-N-IGGI (Tam) = those of the top part
CHIGUERGUE è EGHARGHAR (Tam) = the plain
ERESE (Tam) )= under of, lower part
HIPALAN è IGBALEN (Kab) = the fountains
ICOD (IN) è IKKUDEN (Tach) = pine wood
ICOR è IQQUR (Tam) = to be dry
IDAFE è TIDAF (Tam) = the sentry
IFARA è AFARA = place covered of vegetation
ISQUE è ISK (Tam) = horn
MANDAYA = water down
MANINIDRA = water of (the) mountain
TABURCO è TABUREK (Tam) = the stick, stick
TACUITUNTA è TA-AGÜI-TUNTE = the cliff of the thunder
TAMADAYA è TAMA (Tam) = edge, limit; TAMA-ADAY = edge down
TEJEDA è TEGEDDA (Tam) = natural tray in the rocks
TEJINA è AGENNA (Tam) = clouds, fog
TEROR, ARURE è ARORI (Tam) = back, hill
TIMANFAYA (Tam) = those that spill water
IMI (Tam) =, door, mouth, entered
TINDAYA è YOU-N-ADAY = the down ones
TINCER è YOU-N-ANZAR (Tam) = those of rain


CANARIAN TOPONYMS WITH CONTINENTAL EQUIVALENTS

ADEJE ------------------------ ADEGE (Sahara)
AGUERE ------------------- - GUIR (AGUER) (Morocco)
AGULO ----------------------- AGLU (Morocco)
ARAGUYGO ---------------- GUIGOU (Morocco)
ARGANA -------------------- ARGAN, TAGANA (Morocco)
ASOFA ----------------------- ASIF (Morocco)
BILMA ----------------------- BILMA (Niger)
CHIGUERGUE ------------- AGUERGUER (Sahara), IGUERGUER (Morocco)
IGUESTE -------------------- IGUETTI (Mauritania)
IFARA ------------------------ AFARA (Sahara)
TAGAO ----------------------- TAGAOST (Former Morocco)
TARUDANDA -------------- TARUDANT (Morocco)
TEGUEDITE ---------------- TIGGIDIT (Sahara-Mauritania)
TEGUESTE ----------------- TIGUEUST (Morocco), TAGASTE (Algeria)
TEJEGUATE ---------------- TEJEHUAT (Sahara)
GANDO ---------------------- GANDU (Sahara)
GURUGÚ -------------------- GURUGÚ (Morocco)
NAGA ------------------------ BUNAGA (Mauritania)
UGAN ------------------------ TOUGAN (Burkina-Faso)
SWINDLE ------------------------- IMI (Morocco)
TEIDE ---------------------- TELDE (Morocco)
TEGUISE ------------------- IGUISSE (Morocco)
IDAFE ---------------------- TIDAFE (Morocco)
GUAZA --------------------- WASSA (Morocco)
TINZER ------------------T AINZIRT (Morocco)
ADAY ----------------------- UADAY (Morocco)
ISORA --------------------- AZURA (Morocco)
TABORNO --------------- TABORNOST (Morocco)



Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.