The Radiation Poisoning Of America
by Amy Worthington
Global Research, October 9, 2007
Idaho Observer - 2007-10-07
Prior to 1996, the wireless age was not coming online fast enough, primarily
because communities had the authority to block the siting of cell towers.
But the Federal Communications Act of 1996 made it nearly impossible for
communities to stop construction of cell towers "even if they pose threats
to public health and the environment. Since the decision to enter the age of
wireless convenience was politically determined for us, we have forgotten
well-documented safety and environmental concerns and, with a devil-may-care
zeal that is lethally short-sighted, we have incorporated into our lives
every wireless toy that comes on the market. We behave as if we are addicted
to radiation. Our addiction to cell phones has led to harder "drugs" like
wireless Internet. And now we are bathing in the radiation that our wireless
enthusiasm has unleashed. Those who are addicted, uninformed, corporately
biased and politically-influenced may dismiss our scientifically-sound
concerns about the apocalyptic hazards of wireless radiation. But we must
not. Instead, we must sound the alarm.
Illa Garcia wore jewelry the first day she went back to work as a fire
lookout for the state of California in the summer of 2002. The intense
radiation from dozens of RF/microwave antennas surrounding the lookout
heated the metals on her body enough to burn her skin. "I still have those
scars," she says. "I never wore jewelry to work after that."
Likely Mountain Lookout, on U.S. Forest Service land with a spectacular view
of Mount Shasta, is one of thousands of RF/microwave "hot spots" across the
nation. A newly-erected cellular communications tower was only 30 feet from
the lookout. "One antenna on that tower was even with our heads," recalls
Garcia. "We could hear high-pitched buzzing. There were also three state
communications antennas mounted on the lookout, only 6 feet from where we
walked. We climbed past them every day."
Motorola company manuals for management of communications sites confirm that
high frequency radiation from these antennas is nasty stuff. Safety
regulations mandate warning signs, EMF awareness training, protective gear,
even transmitter deactivation for personnel working that close to antennas.
Garcia and co-worker Mary Jasso were never warned about the hazards. This,
they say, demonstrates extreme malfeasance on the part of agencies and
commercial companies responsible for their exposure.
By the end of fire season, Garcia and Jasso were so ill they were forced to
retire and the lookout was closed to state personnel. Garcia, 52, is now
severely disabled with fibromyalgia, auto-immune thyroiditis and acute nerve
degeneration. Medical tests confirmed broken DNA strands in her blood and
abnormal tissue death in her brain.
Dr. Gunner Heuser, a medical specialist in neurotoxicity, states that Garcia
s disorders are a result of chronic electromagnetic field exposure in the
microwave range and that "she has become totally disabled as a result." Dr.
Heuser wrote, "In my experience patients develop multisystem complaints
after EMF exposure just as they do after toxic chemical exposure."
Jasso, who worked the lookout for 11 seasons, is also disabled with brain
and lung damage, partial left side paralysis, muscle tremors, bone pain and
DNA damage. Jasso discovered that all lookouts who worked Likely Mountain
since 1989 are disabled. At only 61 years of age, she has lost so much
memory that she cannot remember back to when her first three children were
born. She fears that communications radiation may be a major factor in the
nation's phenomenal epidemics of dementia and autism.
Both women say they have been unjustly denied worker's comp and medical
benefits. Their pleas for help to state and federal agencies have been
fruitless. Between them they have racked up over $150,000 in medical bills,
although there is no effective treatment for radiation sickness.
Twenty-two other members of Garcia and Jasso's two families received Likely
Mountain radiation exposure. All now suffer serious and expensive illnesses,
including tumors, blood abnormalities, stomach problems, lung damage, bone
pain, muscle spasms, extreme fatigue, tremors, numbness, impaired motor
skills, cataracts, memory loss, spine degeneration, sleep problems, low
immunity to infection, hearing and vision problems, hair loss and allergies.
Jasso's husband, who often stayed at the lookout, has a rare soft tissue
sarcoma known to be radiation related. Garcia's husband, who spent little
time at the lookout, has systemic cancer that started with sarcoma of the
colon. Garcia's daughter Teresa was at the lookout for a total of two hours
during her first pregnancy. Her daughter was born with slight brain damage
and immunity problems. "That baby was always sick," says Garcia. Teresa
spent only three days at the lookout during her second pregnancy. Her son
was born with autism.
Garcia and Jasso have a terminal condition known as "toxic encephalopathy,"
involving brain damage to frontal and temporal lobes. This was confirmed by
SPECT brain scans. Twelve others in the two-family group who also had the
scans were diagnosed with the affliction. "All of us with this condition
have been told that we,re dying," says Garcia. "Our mutated cells will
reproduce new mutated cells until the body finally shuts down."
Nuclear bombs on a pole
Painful conditions endured by the families of Garcia and Jasso are identical
to those suffered by Japanese victims of gamma wave radiation after nuclear
explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Five decades of studies
confirm that non-ionizing communications radiation in the RF/microwave
spectrum has the same effect on human health as ionizing gamma wave
radiation from nuclear reactions. Leading German radiation expert Dr. Heyo
Eckel, an official of the German Medical Association, states, "The injuries
that result from radioactive radiation are identical with the effects of
electromagnetic radiation. The damages are so similar that they are hard to
differentiate."1
Understanding what happened at Likely Mountain is critical to understanding
the public health threat posed by RF/microwave radiation in the United
States. The families of Garcia and Jasso, plus previous lookout workers and
multitudes of tourists who visited Likely Mountain for camping and
sightseeing, were beamed by the same kind of high frequency radiation that
blasts from tens of thousands of neighborhood cell towers and rooftop
antennas erected across America for wireless communications. The city of San
Francisco, with an area of only seven square miles, has over 2,500 licensed
cell phone antennas positioned at 530 locations throughout the city. In
practical terms, this city, like thousands of others, is being wave-nuked 24
hours a day.
The identical damage resulting from both radioactive gamma waves and high
frequency microwaves involves a pathological condition in which the nuclei
of irradiated human cells splinter into fragments called micronuclei.
Micronuclei are a definitive pre-cursor of cancer. During the 1986 nuclear
reactor disaster at Chernobyl in Russia, the ionizing radiation released was
equivalent to 400 atomic bombs, with an estimated ultimate human toll of 10
000 deaths. Exposed Russians quickly developed blood cell micronuclei,
leaving them at high risk for cancer.
What they wouldn't tell us
RF/microwaves from cell phones and cell tower transmitters also cause
micronuclei damage in blood cells. This was reported a decade ago by Drs.
Henry Lai and Narendrah Singh, biomedical researchers at the University of
Washington in Seattle. Dr. Singh is famous for refining comet assay
techniques used to identify DNA damage. Lai and Singh demonstrated in
numerous animal studies that mobile phone radiation quickly causes DNA
single and double strand breaks at levels well below the current federal
safe" exposure standards.2
The telecommunications industry knows this thanks to its own six-year,
wireless technology research (WTR) study program mandated by Congress and
completed in 1999. Gathering a team of over 200 doctors, scientists and
experts in the field, WTR research showed that human blood exposed to cell
phone radiation had a 300-percent increase in genetic damage in the form of
micronuclei.3 Dr. George Carlo, a public health expert who coordinated the
WTR studies, confirms that exposure to communications radiation from
wireless technology is "potentially the biggest health insult" this nation
has ever seen. Dr. Carlo believes RF/microwave radiation is a greater threat
than cigarette smoking and asbestos.
In 2000, European communications giant T-Mobile commissioned the German
ECOLOG Institute to review all available scientific evidence in regard to
health risks for wireless telecommunications. ECOLOG found over 220
peer-reviewed, published papers documenting the cancer-initiating and
cancer-promoting effects of the high frequency radiation employed by
wireless technology.4 Many corroborating studies have been published since.
By 2004, 12 research groups from seven European countries cooperating in the
REFLEX study project confirmed that microwaves from wireless communications
devices cause significant single and double strand DNA breaks in both human
and animal cells under laboratory conditions.5 In 2005, a Chinese medical
study confirmed statistically significant DNA damage from pulsed microwaves
at cell phone levels.6 That same year, University of Chicago researchers
described how pulsed communications microwaves alter gene expression in
human cells at non-thermal exposure levels.7
Because gamma waves and RF/microwave radiation are identically carcinogenic
and genotoxic to the cellular roots of life, the safe dose of either kind of
radiation is zero. No study has proven that any level of exposure from
cell-damaging radiation is safe for humans. Dr. Carlo confirms that cell
damage is not dose dependant because any exposure level, no matter how small
can trigger damage response by cell mechanisms.8
Officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National
Institutes of Health closely reviewed the damning results of WTR studies,
which also revealed microwave damage to the blood brain barrier. But these
officials have chosen to downplay, obfuscate and even deny the irrepressible
science of the day. Raking in $billions from selling spectrum licenses, the
feds have allowed the telecom industry to unleash demonstrably dangerous
technology which induces millions of people to become brain-intimate with
improperly tested wireless devices9 and which saturates the nation with
carcinogenic waves to service those devices. Dr. Carlo says that even the
American Cancer Society is in bed with the communications industry, which
infuses the Society with substantial contributions.10
Two ways to die
Medical science illustrates that there are two ways to die from radiation
poisoning: Fast burn and slow burn. Nuclear flash-burned Japanese had parts
of their flesh melt off before they died in agony within hours or days.
People have also quickly died after walking through powerful radar beams,
which can microwave-cook internal organs within seconds of exposure.
Slow-burn radiation mechanisms are cumulative, progressive, ongoing and
continual. Thousands of Japanese nuke bomb victims died painfully years
after exposure. The slow burn process of RF/microwave exposure is manifested
by cancer clusters commonly found in communities irradiated by cell tower
transmitters. Recent Swedish epidemiological studies confirm that, after 2
000 hours of cellular phone exposure, or a latency period of about 10 years,
brain cancer risk rises by 240 percent.11
Communications antennas now blast the human habitat with many different
electromagnetic frequencies simultaneously. Human DNA hears this energetic
cacophony loud and clear, reacting like the human ear would to high volume
country music, R&B plus rock and roll screaming from the same speaker.
Irradiated cells struggle to protect themselves against this destructive
dissonance by hardening their membranes. They cease to receive nourishment,
stop releasing toxins, die prematurely and spill micronuclei fragments into
a sort of "tumor bank account." This is precisely how microwave radiation
prematurely ages living tissues.
Nuking the crew
The constant roaming pain is intense for 32-year-old Kenneth Hurtado of
Southern California. He's been to hell and back, starting with a seven-pound
tumor on a kidney, diagnosed in 2002. The cancer spread to his brain. His
first brain tumor was removed by craniotomy, the second by the cyber knife.
In 2005, cancer nodes were found in his lungs. By 2006, the cancer had
metastasized to his legs. This year he is battling three excruciating tumors
on his spinal cord. Hurtado hates his seizures. His last one came on while
he was driving. "It's like the devil taking over your body," he says.
Now unable to work, Hurtado says he was relatively healthy in 1998 when he
began a career as an installer for a large international corporation
manufacturing electronics equipment for wireless providers. At the base of
cell towers there is an equipment "hut" where installers assemble the radios
amplifiers and filters which generate man-made microwave frequencies and
route them up to transmitter antennas through huge cables. Mounted on sector
supports aptly named alpha, beta and gamma, the antennas send and receive
these carcinogenic radio waves and their pulsed data packets at the speed of
light.
Posted on locked fences around the huts are "danger" warning signs. Hurtado
says, "You look around these sites and you find many dead birds on the
gravel. They can't take the radiation and they'll just die. You don't have
to ponder that too long to figure it's bad."
Hurtado doesn't know how much radiation he got on the job. He says there are
at least four connection spots inside the hut where radiation can leak. He
could not avoid the "heat" when he turned the radios on for testing and he
wonders if his cancer is the result. "When I first got hired, we had safety
meetings, but they pretty much minimized the hazards," he remembers. He was
issued no electromagnetic safety clothing and it was not until 2002 that he
got a radiation meter to wear. "The meter is supposed to warn you if you are
getting too much radiation," he says, "but I put mine on a stick and placed
it next to antennas and the alarm never went off."
A medical report in the International Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Health confirms that workers exposed to high levels of
RF/microwave radiation routinely have astronomical cancer rates.12 The
report notes that, for these workers, the latency period between high
radiation exposure and illness is short compared to less exposed populations
Hurtado says there are many industry workers who are dangerously
over-exposed. "I've talked to guys on power crews who have to climb around
the antennas and they've told me that before a work day is half over, they
start feeling really sick." He adds, "In my mind they are getting cooked."
Hurtado suspects that, since the early days of the wireless buildout, there
has been illegal activity related to public exposure from transmission sites
"I'm pretty sure," he says, "that some of the carriers are exceeding FCC
exposure limits. They can turn the radios and amplifiers up to get a bigger
footprint and they don't care if the alarms go on once the installers are
gone." Regulatory inspectors could identify violators because channels can
be spectrum analyzed. "But," he says, "there is just no one to check and I
believe that the public is getting way too much radiation now."
Regulators asleep at the wheel
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the single agency with
authority to regulate the broadcast/communications industry, has neither
money, manpower nor motive to properly monitor radiation output from
hundreds of thousands of commercial wireless installations spewing
carcinogenic waves across the nation. The FCC admits that physical testing
to verify compliance with emissions guidelines is relatively rare.
Critics say that FCC appointees, with virtually no medical or public health
expertise, represent an old-boy network and a cheering squad for the
telecommunications and broadcast industries. The Center for Public Integrity
found that FCC officials have been bribed by the industries with such perks
as expensive trips to Las Vegas.13
Dr. Carlo confirms that there is no regulatory accountability. He says, "You
have to go to those base stations and independently measure what is coming
out of them because we have had many instances where you have an antenna
that is allowed by law to transmit at 100 watts and we have seen up to 900
to 1000 watts. You can turn things up when nobody is looking."14
Neighborhood groups monitoring the broadcast/communications antenna farm on
Lookout Mountain near Denver, Colorado, have consistently found that,
despite protests to the FCC over nine years, radiation on the mountain has
been measured at up to 125 percent of exposure levels permitted by federal
law.15
Lethal exposure guidelines
Even if there were reliable compliance monitoring, many experts say that FCC
public exposure guidelines for RF/microwave radiation are deadly because
they are based on the obsolete and unfounded theory that only power density
hot enough to flash-cook tissues is harmful. This puts FCC at odds with
current scientific knowledge regarding the minimum exposure level at which
harm to living cells begins.
Myriad symptoms of radiation poisoning can be induced at exposure levels
hundreds, even thousands of times lower than current standards permit.
Russia's public exposure standards are 100 times more stringent than ours
because Russian scientists have consistently shown that, at U.S. exposure
levels, humans develop pathological changes in heart, kidney, liver and
brain tissues, plus cancers of all types.16
Norbert Hankin, chief of the EPA's Radiation Protection Division, has stated
that the FCC's exposure guidelines are protective only against effects
arising from a thermal (flash burn) mechanism. He concedes that, "the
generalization by many, that these guidelines protect human beings from harm
by any and all mechanisms, is not justified."17
Thus, public microwave exposure levels tolerated by the FCC and its
industry-loaded advisory committees are a national health disaster. Yet, for
pragmatic and lucrative reasons, federal exposure limits have been
deliberately set so high that no matter how much additional wireless
radiation is added to the national burden, it will always be "within
standards."
The FCC regulatory mess comes into focus with the Likely Mountain case.
Jasso says that when she and Garcia contacted the FCC regarding their
radiation injuries, they were met with an appalling lack of expertise and
concern. "FCC has no answers," Jasso says. "Their exposure guidelines are
convoluted and nonsensical. They refuse to address problems of multiple
antennas, field expansion, human body coupling and blood reversal because
they want to avoid regulatory problems at telecommunication sites." She adds
"FCC will fine a licensee thousands of dollars for not having a light
installed on top of a telecommunications tower, but they have not issued
even a warning letter to their licensees for the injuries that occurred on
Likely Mountain. They say injury cannot occur because their licensees are
regulated."
Catch 22
When Garcia and Jasso filed suit against companies operating microwave
transmitters on Likely Mountain, they could find no attorney who would take
their case and they were forced to proceed pro se. In August, 2007, a
California district court denied their claim, mainly on the grounds that
they had not proven that the defendants had exceeded FCC exposure guidelines
Under federal law the shattered health of 24 people, plus medical testimony
is not sufficient proof of negligence and liability.
Since FCC provides no enforcement monitoring at transmitter sites and since
the radiation industry is not required to prove with consistent
documentation that it is compliant, injured parties have little chance of
proving non-compliance because the damage to their health often becomes
obvious months or even years after their exposure.
The court worried that the Garcia-Jasso case highlights "the conflict
between the FCC's delegated authority to establish RF radiation guidelines
and limits and plaintiffs, attempt to establish that wireless facilities
like the one at Likely Mountain are ultrahazardous."So, while current
science provides ample evidence that FCC's guidelines are ultrahazardous,
the radiation industry hides behind FCC incompetence, simply because FCC
retains exclusive authority to set the standards.
The FCC's disastrous authority is calcified by the Telecommunications Act
(TCA) of 1996. The telecom industry is infamous for lavish "donations" which
keep legislators on its leash. Anticipating a national radiation health
crisis and the public backlash that would follow, the telecom lobby
blatantly bought itself a provision in the law that prohibits state and
local governments from considering environmental (health) effects when
siting personal wireless service facilities so long as "...such facilities
comply with the FCC's regulations concerning such emissions." Many say the
TCA insures that America's war on cancer will never be won, while protecting
gross polluters from liability.
On our own
After passage of the TCA, a group of scientists and engineers, backed by the
Communications Workers of America, filed suit in federal court. They hoped
the Supreme Court would review both the FCC's outdated exposure guidelines
and the legality of a federal law that severely impedes state and local
authority in the siting of hazardous transmitters. In 2001, the Supreme
Court refused to hear the case. The group's subsequent petition to the FCC
asking the agency to bring its exposure guidelines current with the latest
scientific data was denied.18
This is where we stand today. The public has no vote, no voice, no choice.
Chronic exposure to scientifically indefensible levels of DNA-ravaging
radiation is now compulsory for everyone in America. This is why Garcia and
Jasso are ill today; this why the industry enjoys unchallenged power to
place dangerous transmitters in residential and commercial areas with unsafe
setbacks and this is why untold thousands of Americans in buildings with
transmitters on the roof are given no safety warnings, though they work and
dwell in carcinogenic electromagnetic fields. In the meantime, the radiation
industry rakes in $billions in quarterly profits, none of which is set aside
for to pay for the national health catastrophe at hand.
Every citizen is now condemned to protect and defend himself against
radiation assault as best he can. There have been a number of lawsuits
against the radiation industry since cell towers began going up in backyards
across the nation. In 2001, a group action lawsuit was filed in South Bend,
Indiana, by families living in close proximity to towers. The complaint
describes health effects suffered by the plaintiffs, including heart
palpitations, interference with hearing, recurring headaches, short term
memory loss, sleep disturbances, multiple tumors, glandular problems,
chronic fatigue, allergies, weakened immune system, miscarriage and
inability to learn.19
The South Bend suit was settled out of court on the basis of nuisance and
decreased property values. Health claims don't hold water if emissions are
within FCC exposure standards. This case is valuable for understanding the
lunacy of FCC standards. The sick families enlisted the help of radiation
consultant Bill Curry, who honed his expertise as an engineer for Argonne
and Livermore labs. Dr. Curry found that one of the towers was irradiating
homes at over 65 microwatts per square centimeter.20 This power density is
well within federal exposure standards, which allow any neighborhood to be
zapped with at least 580 microwatts per square centimeter, or higher,
depending on the frequencies. If the families were sick at 65 microwatts/cm2
what would they be at 580? Considering that the Soviets used furtive Cold
War microwave bombardment to make US embassy personal radiation-sick at an
average exposure level of only .01 microwatts/cm2, America's clear and
present danger is obvious.21
How radiation sick is America?
Since the wireless revolution began wave-nuking the U.S. in the 1990s, there
have been no federally funded health studies to assess the cumulative
effects of ever-increasing communications radiation on public health. There
is no national database enabling citizens to study the location of
transmitters in their areas. Local and state governments can offer no
information on how much commercial wireless radiation is contaminating their
populations. When trying to find out who owns a tower or which companies
have transmitters on that tower, citizens usually hit a brick wall.
Dr. Carlo heads the only independent, post-market health surveillance
registry in the nation where people can report radiation illness. 22 Dr.
Carlo says the registry has heard from thousands of people who believe that
their illnesses, including brain and eye cancers, are due to
telecommunications radiation from both wireless phones and tower
transmitters. In the last two years, the registry has seen an upsurge in
reports as transmitters become ever more energetically dangerous in order to
accommodate increased data flow for new, multi-media technologies.
We can only guess how many Americans are in their graves today from
microwave assault. Arthur Firstenberg, who founded the Cellular Phone Task
Force, wrote that, on November 14, 1996, New York City's first digital
cellular provider activated thousands of PCS antennae newly erected on the
rooftops of apartment buildings. Health authorities reported that a severe
and lingering flu hit the city that same week. In response to its classified
newspaper ad advising that radiation sickness is similar to flu, the Task
Force heard back from hundreds of people who reported sudden onset symptoms
synchronous to microwave startup"symptoms similar to stroke, heart attack
and nervous breakdown.
Firstenberg then gathered statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and analyzed weekly mortality statistics published for 122 U.S.
cities. Each of dozens of cities recorded a 10-25 percent increase in
mortality, lasting two to three months, beginning in the week during which
that city's first digital cell phone network began commercial service.
Cities with no cellular system start up in the same time period showed no
abnormal increases in mortality. 23
Studies abroad
Recent health surveys in other nations confirm that people living close to
wireless transmitters are in big trouble:
In 2002, French medical specialists found that people living close to cell
towers suffered extreme sleep disruption, chronic fatigue, nausea, skin
problems, irritability, brain disturbances and cardiovascular problems.24
German researchers found that people living within 1,200 feet of a
transmitter site in the German city of Naila had a high rate of cancer and
developed their tumors on average eight years earlier than the national
average. Breast cancer topped the list.25
Spanish researchers found that people living within 1,000 feet of cellular
antennas had statistically significant illness at an average power density
of 0.11 to 0.19 microwatts /cm2, which is thousands of times less than
allowed by international exposure standards.26
An Egyptian medical study found that people living near mobile phone base
stations were at high risk for developing nerve and psychiatric problems,
plus debilitating changes in neurobehavioral function. Exposed persons had
significantly lower performance on tests for attention, short term auditory
memory and problem solving.27
Researchers in Israel studied people in the town of Netanya who had lived
near a cell tower for 3-7 years. They had a cancer rate four times higher
than the control population. Breast cancer was most prevalent. 28
Europe in an uproar
A new European Union poll of more than 27,000 people across the continent
reveals that 76 percent of respondents feel that they are being made ill by
wireless transmitters.29 Seventy-one percent in the UK believe they suffer
health effects from mast (cell tower) radiation. In April 2007, The London
Times reported a startling number of cancer clusters in mast neighborhoods.
One study in Warwickshire, found 31 cancers around a single street. 30 Some
sick Brits send their blood to a lab in Germany, which uses state of the art
methodology to confirm wireless radiation damage.
Radiation sickness is now so prevalent in Germany that 175 doctors have
signed the Bramberger Appeal, a document calling the situation a "medical
disaster." It asks the German government to initiate a national public
health investigation. This appeal closely follows the Freiburger Appeal,
signed by thousands of German doctors who say they are dealing with an
epidemic of severe and chronic diseases among both old and young patients
exposed to wireless microwave radiation. The head of the cancer registry in
Berlin found that one urban area with cellular antennas had a breast cancer
rate seven times the national average.31
Sweden was one of the first nations to go wireless. Swedish neuroscientist,
Dr. Olle Johansson, with hundreds of published papers to his credit, says
that a national epidemic of illness and disability was unleashed by the
wireless revolution. Long periods of sick leave, attempted suicides and
industrial accidents all increased simultaneously with introduction of
mobile phone radiation. Ninety-nine percent of the Swedish population is now
under duress of powerful third generation masts. Johansson reports that
people are plagued with sleep disorders, chronic fatigue that does not
respond to rest, difficulties with cognitive function and serious blood
problems. Recurrent headaches and migraines are a "substantial public health
problem," he says.32
Rooftop transmitters, which readily pass microwave radiation into structures
can be a death sentence. Across the world there are reports of cancer
clusters and extreme illness in office buildings and multi-tenant dwellings
where antennas are placed on rooftops directly over workers and tenants. In
2006, the top floors of a Melbourne University office building were closed
after a brain tumor cluster drew media attention to the risks of
communications transmitters on top of the building.33 Likewise, ABC's
Brisbane television complex, topped with satellite dishes and radio antennas
was the site of a well-publicized breast cancer cluster among workers.34
Deadlier death rays
In the meantime, the radiation cowboys of America are having a good ol time
because they know there's no sheriff in town. The commercial wireless
industry is relentless in its drive to construct thousands of new
transmitter sites in neighborhoods and schoolyards everywhere, while adding
more powerful antennas at its older sites. Countless WiFi systems, both
indoors and out, accommodate wireless laptop computers, personal digital
assistants, WiFi-enabled phones, gaming devices, video cameras, even parking
and utility meters. Hundreds of cities already have or are planning to fund
WiFi networks, each consisting of thousands of small microwave transmitters
bolted to buildings, street lamps, park benches and bus stops. Some networks
are being buried under sidewalks. These access points or "nodes" blast
carcinogenic energy at 2.4 to 5 gigahertz with virtually no warning signs
about radiation exposure. WiFi radiation is unregulated by the FCC.
Sprint-Nextel and Clearwire are now rolling out in U.S. cities tower-mounted
WiMAX transmitters providing wireless internet access "to die for." WiMAX is
WiFi on steroids. Upon startup of WiMAX transmitters near the Swedish
village of Gotene, the emergency room at the local hospital was flooded by
calls from people overcome with pulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms.35
WiMAX radiation could one day be cranked up to a bone-incinerating 66
gigahertz.36 A single WiMAX tower could provide internet coverage for an
area of 3,000 square miles, although coverage for 6-25 square miles is the
norm now. Promoters say WiMAX may some day replace all cable and DSL
broadband services and irradiate virtually all rural areas. Yet, not a
single environmental or public health study has been required as the
industry unleashes infrastructure for this savage new wireless technology
from which no living flesh will escape.
The commercial ray-peddlers are not alone in their quest to make the U.S. a
radiation wasteland. In August, 2007, Congress approved new Homeland
Security legislation which funds a program to "promote communications
compatibility between local, state and federal officials." We catch a
glimpse of what this portends as the state of New York gears up to erect
hundreds of new wireless installations for a "Statewide Wireless Network
(SWN)." This system will blanket 97 percent of the state, allowing agencies
at various government levels to communicate instantly while greatly adding
to the fog of commercial wireless pollution.37 The New York Office for
Technology says that the radiation power densities of the system will be
within FCC limits. That assurance should give us the shivers.
Angela's story
Angela Flynn, a 43-year-old caregiver, lives in Santa Cruz, California. Last
spring she took classes at a local church where wireless antennas were
concealed in a chimney on the building. She recalls, "Every muscle in my
body felt sore. And my joints were feeling creaky. My instructor mentioned
how people at the women's center on church property had similar symptoms.
During my sixth day I had a severe reaction. My short term memory was gone
and I was disoriented and confused. When the instructor asked a question, I
could not recall anything from the lecture."
At night, Angela could not sleep and she would lie awake, feeling her body
buzz. She became hypersensitive to other sources of electromagnetic
radiation. The symptoms became so bothersome that she canceled the rest of
her course. Using a chart for calculating cumulative, non-ionizing,
electromagnetic radiation exposure levels, she found that the classes
located only 100 feet from antennas in the building" had suffered the
highest possible exposure during peak operation. "It took a month before I
regained my health," she reports.
When Angela wrote letters to the church inquiring whether it was monitoring
the health of the people exposed to antenna radiation, church officials were
"unresponsive and dismissive." So Angela saw the light. She helped organize
a community group to put pressure on county officials for answers. After
hearing community testimony, officials directed the zoning department to
create a comprehensive map of county transmitter sites and to put together a
report on emissions testing.
Angela says, "We recently had a delay of an installation of a tower near a
middle school. The superintendent has even come out against the tower and
was instrumental in delaying the hearing on the site. He also arranged a
school board meeting on the issue." Angela's efforts to share critical
information with her community made a difference.
Conclusion
America must soon face its radiation cataclysm. The EMR Network says that
millions of workers occupy worksites on a daily basis where operating
antenna arrays are camouflaged and where no RF safety program is carried out
Thanks to shameless predatory advertising techniques, American youth are
now literally addicted to "texting," watching TV and accessing the Internet
on tiny wireless screens. These are the toys that keep cell towers and WiFi
hot spots buzzing. A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to
fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and
short-lived population.
Right now, 11.7 million Americans have been diagnosed with cancer. Because
humans can harbor cancer conditions for years before detection, additional
millions of cancer victims are yet undiagnosed. The Journal of Oncology
Practice predicts that, by 2020, there will be so many cancer cases in the U
S. that doctors may not be able to cope with their caseloads. The report
concludes the nation could soon face a shortage of up to 4,000 cancer
specialists.38
A recent CBS news series on the raging American cancer epidemic left viewers
with the mindset that trainloads of federal cash must flow if we are to find
the cancer answer. But a proven cancer initiator now inundates our cities,
roadways, schools, offices and homes. Any environmental stressor that
jackhammers human cells at millions to billions of cycles per second is a
cancer factor. Any wave-pollution that breaks the DNA and causes
pre-cancerous micronuclei in human blood is a cancer factor. Logic tells us
that there will be no "answer to cancer" until we eliminate the cancer
factors.
Wireless communications radiation is to America today what DDT, thalidomide,
dioxin, benzene, Agent Orange and asbestos were yesterday. Historically, the
truth about the public health menace of extreme toxins is never told until
thousands sicken and die.
Dr. Robert Becker, noted for decades of research on the effects of
electromagnetic radiation, has warned: "Even if we survive the chemical and
atomic threats to our existence, there is the strong possibility that
increasing electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading
to our extinction before we are even aware of them. All life pulsates in
time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all
organisms. These energies are too dangerous to entrust forever to
politicians, military leaders and their lapdog researchers." 39
Our mission to save the nation's health and restore sanity in the wireless
age seems daunting. The wireless juggernaut is an aggressive, mean machine.
Federal regulators are clearly compromised and incompetent to protect the
public health. Uninformed consumers dearly love their magic digital toys and
don't yet understand the connection between those toys and a national raging
cancer epidemic that may consume us all.
Powerful economic interests have lied to us long enough. Americans deserve
the facts. We need dialogue. Wireless radiation is a form of electronic
trespass. America must decide whose rights are more important"idlers beaming
death rays for piddling gibberish or the elderly with pacemakers who are
made ill by cell phone and tower radiation wherever they go. Must we all
prematurely perish so that wireless enthusiasts can capture cell phone
photos and instantly send them for processing via carcinogen express? Must
all neighborhoods become sick zones so that radiation addicts can receive
recipes, ads and other frivolous text messages on their cell phone toys?
Does a human being have the right to NOT be forcibly WiMAXED into a coffin,
or do only wireless providers and their devotees have rights?
What can we do?
We can commit to join the growing radiation awareness movement and continue
educating ourselves and others. We can employ digital and audio radiation
detectors to help safeguard our personal health and to demonstrate the
ceaseless brutality of ubiquitous wireless radiation which threatens the
genetic integrity of future generations. We can promote emerging
technologies that could make communications technologies safer.
We can demand that federal radiation exposure standards and setback
requirements be updated to reflect the realities of modern science. Federal
communications law must be rewritten so that local jurisdictions can regain
their right to consider health and environment when reviewing wireless
siting applications. We can insist that wireless emissions from transmitters
be drastically reduced as they are in Austria and Russia. We can demand
routine compliance testing at all transmitter sites. We can see to it that
people who have been living and working near powerful transmitters be given
opportunity to report their resulting illnesses in national surveys. Proper
epidemiological studies must be conducted and their results published and
broadly disseminated.
Each of us can break the seductive, but oppressive wireless habit ourselves.
We can play no game, use no wireless Internet system, make no trivial phone
call that necessitates enlarging America's dense forest of wireless
transmitters. If no one buys WiMAX-enabled devices and related services,
this dangerous system will fail.
Whenever possible, we can go back to the old-fashioned, corded phones and
message machines which made yesteryear a far more healthy time. Cordless
household and office phones emit powerful megahertz or gigahertz microwave
radiation, causing damage to hearing, eyesight and brain function. DECT
cordless phones irradiate a huge area even when not in use. We can encourage
others to contact us by conventional land line phones only. Can we enjoy a
leisurely conversation knowing that an irradiated caller risks disease and
disability for mindless chatter? What good is wireless convenience if it
means being ultimately tethered to a hospital bed? We can teach our children
that health is more important than passing convenience and instant
gratification.
According to OSHA, no environment should be deliberately made hazardous.
Backed by current scientific knowledge, we can refuse to work or shop in an
environment which endangers our health. We can demand that megahertz and
gigahertz cordless phones, walkie talkie radios, WLAN and WiFi systems be
removed from schools, offices, hospitals and any public place where people
are grossly irradiated without their informed consent. Second hand smoke is
bad; second hand radiation is worse.
We wish to thank the courageous radiation victims interviewed for this
report who have generously revealed the details of their personal suffering
in order to warn others. Following their example, we must continue undaunted
in the moral quest to protect the national health and restore the world to
sanity before it is too late.
Meters and resources
The Electrosmog Detector allows you to HEAR the intensity of RF/microwave
pollution in your environment. Developed by British radiation expert
Alasdair Phillips, this battery-operated device will quickly allow you to
identify dangerous RF/microwave hotspots, even where transmitters are
concealed, and take action to protect yourself. This meter is $99 (price
includes shipping) and can be obtained from HEARING IS BELIEVING, Box 64
Hayden, Idaho 83835. E-mail: <mailto:gzz%40icehouse.net>gzz@icehouse.net.
The Trifield Meter ($145), produced by Alpha Lab, is used mainly to measure
the milligauss of electromagnetic fields coming from 60 hertz sources. Use
this digital meter to make sure your living and working spaces are under 2
milligauss. Alpha Lab's Microwave Power Density Meter ($320) is a more
sensitive digital microwave meter that will help you assess the kilohertz,
megahertz and gigahertz radiation in our wireless environment. This
easy-read meter measures microwave radiation in microwatts per cm2, allowing
comparison of your readings to the power density used by the Russians to
make our embassy staff sick. Remember, people inside the embassy reportedly
received only about .01 microwatts per cm2. For more information, contact
Alpha Lab Inc., 1280 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101; (800)
658-7030; www.trifield.com
Alan Broadband produces radiation detection devices with models ranging in
price from $159 to $2,800. The $159 model, while not giving detailed
readings, is an extremely sensitive and sturdy instrument that gives an
accurate dial read on whether or not radiation is present and its relative
intensity. It lets you know when you are being irradiated and serves as an
excellent tool to illustrate exposure levels to others. For more information
contact Alan Broadband 93 Arch St., Redwood City, California 94062; (888)
369-9627; www.zapchecker.com
Books
Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and
Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001.
Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette, Robert C. Kane, Vantage Press, 2001.
Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard? The
Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, Edited by B. Blake Levitt, 2000.
Order from Barnes and Noble.
Websites
These websites provide excellent information on all aspects of health and
other issues relating to electromagnetic fields and radio
frequency/microwave radiation.
www.buergerwelle.com This excellent German (but in English) site features
RF/microwave radiation news from all over the world. The science keeps
pouring in and this is where to find it, along with lots of human interest.
www.cprnewsbureau.org This is an excellent source of up-to-date news on
wireless issues.
www.emrnetwork.org This site has superb resources organized by
professionals with expertise in all facets of our RF/microwave radiation
problem.
www.safewireless.org This site features Dr. Carlo's Mobil Telephone Health
Concerns Registry where people can report ill health effects from living
near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless devices. It also
features great news reports.
www.microwavenews.com This is home to Microwave News, an excellent monthly
publication. It offers cutting edge science reports, plus a great archive.
www.sageassociates.net This site provides valuable information on how to
make homes and offices safer in the wireless age.
CAUTION: There are many devices on the market claiming to protect wireless
users from radiation. These include: air tube headsets, ferrite bead
clip-ons and an array of paste-ons advertised to cut down on thermal effects
or deflect negative energy. Energy testing, kinesiology and meter readings
indicate that these mitigation devices DO NOT adequately protect against the
brutal force of near field microwave radiation. You can investigate the
effectiveness of these devices by metering radiation levels while using them
If radiation pours from your "safe" headset, don't bank your life on it. If
practiced in the art of kinesiology, you can also "muscle test" the
effectiveness of the radiation mitigation device. The human body becomes
very weak when irradiated with any man-made frequency, especially microwaves
If a protective device is really working, you will not detect muscle
weakness when the body is near a transmitting wireless phone or gadget.
OUR BEST TIP: If you want a safe household phone, find an AT&T corded
speaker phone 950, available at most large office supply stores. It emits no
microwave radiation, holds up to heavy use, has a great digital display
screen and allows hands-free conversation.
NOTES
1. Interview with Dr. Eckel was published by Schwabischen Post 12-07-06.
Find this interview at www.heseproject.org. See "The Cell Nucleus is
Mutating."
2. "Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation," a
paper presented by Dr. Lai to the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium,
October 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna. Also "DNA Damage and Cell Phone
Radiation," www.rfsafe.com, 11-02-05.
3. Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and
Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001, p.151.
4. "Mobile Telecommunications and Health"Summary of the ECOLOG study for
T-Mobile, 2000," Find this summary at www.hese-project.org.
5. "Cell Phone Radiation Harms DNA, Study Claims," (Reuters) MSNBC, 12-04-04
Also "Mobile Phone Radiation Harms DNA," R. Moss, CPR News Bureau, 10-16-06
6. "RF-Induced DNA Breaks Reported in China," Microwave News, 09-29-05. This
report comes from the Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
7. "2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human
cells," Lee S. et al, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, PubMed
16107253.
8. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review," a
public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent
dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
9. Few Americans know that cell phones have never been safety tested thanks
to the FDA, which exempted cell phones from pre-market testing based on a
low power exclusion" rule.
10. "The American Cancer Society is Misleading the Public," Dr. George Carlo
8-5-07. Find this statement at www.buergerwelle.com.
11. "Long-Term Mobile Phone Use Raises Brain Tumor Risk: Study," Reuters,
03-31-06. This research was conducted by the Swedish National Institute for
Working Life whose scientists studied 905 people with malignant brain tumors
to confirm a 240% increased risk of brain tumors after heavy mobile phone
use.
12. "Cancer in Radar Technicians Exposed to RF/Microwave Radiation: Sentinel
Episodes," Richter E. et al, Int. J. Occup Environ Health 6 (3):187-193,
2000.
13. "FCC Lives Large off Lobbyist Bribes," Capitol Hill Blue, 05-22-03,
capitolhillblue.com.
14. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review,"
public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent
dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
15. See <<http://www.c-a-r-e.org/>http://www.c-a-r-e.org/>www.c-a-r-e.org for information about
groups affected by Lookout Mountain broadcast antennas.
16. For an excellent chart comparing biological effects at power density
levels and a list of international exposure standards, go to: "Radio Wave
Packet," Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force, Sept 2001; also find
this power density list at: "Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of
Proposed San Francisco Earthlink WiFi Network, Magda Havas, Ph.D, Trent
University, May 2007.
17. Quote from letter by Norbert Hankin, chief environmental scientist with
EPA's Radiation Protection Division. This letter was received by EMR Network
7-16-02 and can be found at www.emrnetwork.org.
18. "Supreme Court Rebuffs Challenge to U.S. Tower Policy," Microwave News,
Jan./Feb 2001; also EMR Network Petition For Inquiry To Consider Amendment
of Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules Concerning the Environmental Effects of
Radiofrequency Radiation, September 25, 2001. See also FCC order to deny
application for review filed by the EMR Network, adopted July 28, 2003.
These documents found at www.emrnetwork.org.
19. Hicks, Onnink, Barber, Pennington v. Horvath Communications, Cause No
71C01-0107-CP St. Joseph Circuit Court, St Joseph County, Indiana.
20. "Some Unexpected Health Hazards Associated with Cell Tower Siting," Bill
P. Curry, PhD., Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard?
The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, edited by B. Blake Levitt,
2000. See chapter 6.
21. Practical Guidelines to Protect Human Health Against Electromagnetic
Radiation Emitted in Mobile Telephony, Summary June 2001, Miguel Muntane
Condeminas, industrial engineer for Consulting Comunicacio i Disseny S.L,
Barcelona, <mailto:m.co-di@eic.ictnet.es>m.co-di@eic.ictnet.es. See Section
4.3.1 "US Embassy in Moscow Study."
22. See www.health-concerns.org and <<http://www.safewireless.org/>http://www.safewireless.org/>www
safewireless.org. These sites provide a pathway to access Dr. Carlo's Mobil
Telephone Health Concerns Registry where people can report ill health
effects from living near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless
devices.
23. "Electromagnetic Fields, (EMF) Killing Fields," Arthur Firstenberg, The
Ecologist, v. 34, n. 5, 6-10-2004.
24. "Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone
base stations: I. influences of distance and sex," R. Santini et al,
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées"laboratoire de
biochimie-pharmacologie, 2002.
25. "Cancer Risks from Microwaves Confirmed," Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Institute of
Science in Society press release, 5-24-07.
26. "The Microwave Syndrome"a preliminary study in Spain," Navarro E. et al,
Biology and Medicine, 22 (2 &3) 161-169, 2003; also " The Microwave Syndrome
Further Aspects of a Spanish Study," Oberfeld G et al 2004, International
Conference Proceedings, Kos, Greece 2004.
27. "Neurobehavioral Effects Among Inhabitants Around Mobile Phone Base
Stations," Abdel-Rassoul et al, Neurotoxicology, 8-01-2006.
28. "Increase of Cancer Near Cell-Phone Transmitter Station," Wolf D. and
Wolf, International Journal of Cancer Prevention 1-2, April 2004.
29. "Two in Three Believe Radiation from Phones Damaged their Health,"
Geoffrey Lean, 7-8-07 Independent on Sunday, U.K.
30. "Cancer Cluster at Phone Masts, " Times On Line, The Sunday Times, UK
4-22-07.
31. Report by Roland Stabenow, 9-21-06, head of cancer registry in Berlin.
32. "How Shall We Cope With the Increasing Amounts of Airborne Radiation?"
Olle Johansson, Journal of the Australasian College of Environmental
Medicine, Dec. 2006.
33. "Building Top Floors Closed After Brain Tumor Alert," Lisa Macnamara,
The Australian, UK, 05-13-07. Read this report at www.rense.com.
34. "Cancer Strikes 12 Female Staffers," Tony Koch, Omega-News, 4-06-07.
35. "Swedes Hit Hard By WiMax, 6-12-06. This story says that the Swedish
media reported that in the town of Gotene, the hospital emergency room was
flooded with calls regarding headaches, difficulty breathing, blurry vision
and heart problems upon WiMAX start-up. At least 5 people had to leave their
homes.
36. "How WiMAX Works," E. Grabianowski and M. Brain, www.computer
howstuffworks.com.
37. "250-foot Tower Raises New Bellevue Fears, John Hopkins, Cheektowaga
Times, 8-09-2007; See also "Congress Approves Homeland Security Bill,"
Spencer Hsu, Washington Post 08-07-07.
38. Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, March 2007: 79-86.
39. Robert Becker, The Body Electric, 1986.
<http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025>http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025
by Amy Worthington
Global Research, October 9, 2007
Idaho Observer - 2007-10-07
Prior to 1996, the wireless age was not coming online fast enough, primarily
because communities had the authority to block the siting of cell towers.
But the Federal Communications Act of 1996 made it nearly impossible for
communities to stop construction of cell towers "even if they pose threats
to public health and the environment. Since the decision to enter the age of
wireless convenience was politically determined for us, we have forgotten
well-documented safety and environmental concerns and, with a devil-may-care
zeal that is lethally short-sighted, we have incorporated into our lives
every wireless toy that comes on the market. We behave as if we are addicted
to radiation. Our addiction to cell phones has led to harder "drugs" like
wireless Internet. And now we are bathing in the radiation that our wireless
enthusiasm has unleashed. Those who are addicted, uninformed, corporately
biased and politically-influenced may dismiss our scientifically-sound
concerns about the apocalyptic hazards of wireless radiation. But we must
not. Instead, we must sound the alarm.
Illa Garcia wore jewelry the first day she went back to work as a fire
lookout for the state of California in the summer of 2002. The intense
radiation from dozens of RF/microwave antennas surrounding the lookout
heated the metals on her body enough to burn her skin. "I still have those
scars," she says. "I never wore jewelry to work after that."
Likely Mountain Lookout, on U.S. Forest Service land with a spectacular view
of Mount Shasta, is one of thousands of RF/microwave "hot spots" across the
nation. A newly-erected cellular communications tower was only 30 feet from
the lookout. "One antenna on that tower was even with our heads," recalls
Garcia. "We could hear high-pitched buzzing. There were also three state
communications antennas mounted on the lookout, only 6 feet from where we
walked. We climbed past them every day."
Motorola company manuals for management of communications sites confirm that
high frequency radiation from these antennas is nasty stuff. Safety
regulations mandate warning signs, EMF awareness training, protective gear,
even transmitter deactivation for personnel working that close to antennas.
Garcia and co-worker Mary Jasso were never warned about the hazards. This,
they say, demonstrates extreme malfeasance on the part of agencies and
commercial companies responsible for their exposure.
By the end of fire season, Garcia and Jasso were so ill they were forced to
retire and the lookout was closed to state personnel. Garcia, 52, is now
severely disabled with fibromyalgia, auto-immune thyroiditis and acute nerve
degeneration. Medical tests confirmed broken DNA strands in her blood and
abnormal tissue death in her brain.
Dr. Gunner Heuser, a medical specialist in neurotoxicity, states that Garcia
s disorders are a result of chronic electromagnetic field exposure in the
microwave range and that "she has become totally disabled as a result." Dr.
Heuser wrote, "In my experience patients develop multisystem complaints
after EMF exposure just as they do after toxic chemical exposure."
Jasso, who worked the lookout for 11 seasons, is also disabled with brain
and lung damage, partial left side paralysis, muscle tremors, bone pain and
DNA damage. Jasso discovered that all lookouts who worked Likely Mountain
since 1989 are disabled. At only 61 years of age, she has lost so much
memory that she cannot remember back to when her first three children were
born. She fears that communications radiation may be a major factor in the
nation's phenomenal epidemics of dementia and autism.
Both women say they have been unjustly denied worker's comp and medical
benefits. Their pleas for help to state and federal agencies have been
fruitless. Between them they have racked up over $150,000 in medical bills,
although there is no effective treatment for radiation sickness.
Twenty-two other members of Garcia and Jasso's two families received Likely
Mountain radiation exposure. All now suffer serious and expensive illnesses,
including tumors, blood abnormalities, stomach problems, lung damage, bone
pain, muscle spasms, extreme fatigue, tremors, numbness, impaired motor
skills, cataracts, memory loss, spine degeneration, sleep problems, low
immunity to infection, hearing and vision problems, hair loss and allergies.
Jasso's husband, who often stayed at the lookout, has a rare soft tissue
sarcoma known to be radiation related. Garcia's husband, who spent little
time at the lookout, has systemic cancer that started with sarcoma of the
colon. Garcia's daughter Teresa was at the lookout for a total of two hours
during her first pregnancy. Her daughter was born with slight brain damage
and immunity problems. "That baby was always sick," says Garcia. Teresa
spent only three days at the lookout during her second pregnancy. Her son
was born with autism.
Garcia and Jasso have a terminal condition known as "toxic encephalopathy,"
involving brain damage to frontal and temporal lobes. This was confirmed by
SPECT brain scans. Twelve others in the two-family group who also had the
scans were diagnosed with the affliction. "All of us with this condition
have been told that we,re dying," says Garcia. "Our mutated cells will
reproduce new mutated cells until the body finally shuts down."
Nuclear bombs on a pole
Painful conditions endured by the families of Garcia and Jasso are identical
to those suffered by Japanese victims of gamma wave radiation after nuclear
explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Five decades of studies
confirm that non-ionizing communications radiation in the RF/microwave
spectrum has the same effect on human health as ionizing gamma wave
radiation from nuclear reactions. Leading German radiation expert Dr. Heyo
Eckel, an official of the German Medical Association, states, "The injuries
that result from radioactive radiation are identical with the effects of
electromagnetic radiation. The damages are so similar that they are hard to
differentiate."1
Understanding what happened at Likely Mountain is critical to understanding
the public health threat posed by RF/microwave radiation in the United
States. The families of Garcia and Jasso, plus previous lookout workers and
multitudes of tourists who visited Likely Mountain for camping and
sightseeing, were beamed by the same kind of high frequency radiation that
blasts from tens of thousands of neighborhood cell towers and rooftop
antennas erected across America for wireless communications. The city of San
Francisco, with an area of only seven square miles, has over 2,500 licensed
cell phone antennas positioned at 530 locations throughout the city. In
practical terms, this city, like thousands of others, is being wave-nuked 24
hours a day.
The identical damage resulting from both radioactive gamma waves and high
frequency microwaves involves a pathological condition in which the nuclei
of irradiated human cells splinter into fragments called micronuclei.
Micronuclei are a definitive pre-cursor of cancer. During the 1986 nuclear
reactor disaster at Chernobyl in Russia, the ionizing radiation released was
equivalent to 400 atomic bombs, with an estimated ultimate human toll of 10
000 deaths. Exposed Russians quickly developed blood cell micronuclei,
leaving them at high risk for cancer.
What they wouldn't tell us
RF/microwaves from cell phones and cell tower transmitters also cause
micronuclei damage in blood cells. This was reported a decade ago by Drs.
Henry Lai and Narendrah Singh, biomedical researchers at the University of
Washington in Seattle. Dr. Singh is famous for refining comet assay
techniques used to identify DNA damage. Lai and Singh demonstrated in
numerous animal studies that mobile phone radiation quickly causes DNA
single and double strand breaks at levels well below the current federal
safe" exposure standards.2
The telecommunications industry knows this thanks to its own six-year,
wireless technology research (WTR) study program mandated by Congress and
completed in 1999. Gathering a team of over 200 doctors, scientists and
experts in the field, WTR research showed that human blood exposed to cell
phone radiation had a 300-percent increase in genetic damage in the form of
micronuclei.3 Dr. George Carlo, a public health expert who coordinated the
WTR studies, confirms that exposure to communications radiation from
wireless technology is "potentially the biggest health insult" this nation
has ever seen. Dr. Carlo believes RF/microwave radiation is a greater threat
than cigarette smoking and asbestos.
In 2000, European communications giant T-Mobile commissioned the German
ECOLOG Institute to review all available scientific evidence in regard to
health risks for wireless telecommunications. ECOLOG found over 220
peer-reviewed, published papers documenting the cancer-initiating and
cancer-promoting effects of the high frequency radiation employed by
wireless technology.4 Many corroborating studies have been published since.
By 2004, 12 research groups from seven European countries cooperating in the
REFLEX study project confirmed that microwaves from wireless communications
devices cause significant single and double strand DNA breaks in both human
and animal cells under laboratory conditions.5 In 2005, a Chinese medical
study confirmed statistically significant DNA damage from pulsed microwaves
at cell phone levels.6 That same year, University of Chicago researchers
described how pulsed communications microwaves alter gene expression in
human cells at non-thermal exposure levels.7
Because gamma waves and RF/microwave radiation are identically carcinogenic
and genotoxic to the cellular roots of life, the safe dose of either kind of
radiation is zero. No study has proven that any level of exposure from
cell-damaging radiation is safe for humans. Dr. Carlo confirms that cell
damage is not dose dependant because any exposure level, no matter how small
can trigger damage response by cell mechanisms.8
Officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National
Institutes of Health closely reviewed the damning results of WTR studies,
which also revealed microwave damage to the blood brain barrier. But these
officials have chosen to downplay, obfuscate and even deny the irrepressible
science of the day. Raking in $billions from selling spectrum licenses, the
feds have allowed the telecom industry to unleash demonstrably dangerous
technology which induces millions of people to become brain-intimate with
improperly tested wireless devices9 and which saturates the nation with
carcinogenic waves to service those devices. Dr. Carlo says that even the
American Cancer Society is in bed with the communications industry, which
infuses the Society with substantial contributions.10
Two ways to die
Medical science illustrates that there are two ways to die from radiation
poisoning: Fast burn and slow burn. Nuclear flash-burned Japanese had parts
of their flesh melt off before they died in agony within hours or days.
People have also quickly died after walking through powerful radar beams,
which can microwave-cook internal organs within seconds of exposure.
Slow-burn radiation mechanisms are cumulative, progressive, ongoing and
continual. Thousands of Japanese nuke bomb victims died painfully years
after exposure. The slow burn process of RF/microwave exposure is manifested
by cancer clusters commonly found in communities irradiated by cell tower
transmitters. Recent Swedish epidemiological studies confirm that, after 2
000 hours of cellular phone exposure, or a latency period of about 10 years,
brain cancer risk rises by 240 percent.11
Communications antennas now blast the human habitat with many different
electromagnetic frequencies simultaneously. Human DNA hears this energetic
cacophony loud and clear, reacting like the human ear would to high volume
country music, R&B plus rock and roll screaming from the same speaker.
Irradiated cells struggle to protect themselves against this destructive
dissonance by hardening their membranes. They cease to receive nourishment,
stop releasing toxins, die prematurely and spill micronuclei fragments into
a sort of "tumor bank account." This is precisely how microwave radiation
prematurely ages living tissues.
Nuking the crew
The constant roaming pain is intense for 32-year-old Kenneth Hurtado of
Southern California. He's been to hell and back, starting with a seven-pound
tumor on a kidney, diagnosed in 2002. The cancer spread to his brain. His
first brain tumor was removed by craniotomy, the second by the cyber knife.
In 2005, cancer nodes were found in his lungs. By 2006, the cancer had
metastasized to his legs. This year he is battling three excruciating tumors
on his spinal cord. Hurtado hates his seizures. His last one came on while
he was driving. "It's like the devil taking over your body," he says.
Now unable to work, Hurtado says he was relatively healthy in 1998 when he
began a career as an installer for a large international corporation
manufacturing electronics equipment for wireless providers. At the base of
cell towers there is an equipment "hut" where installers assemble the radios
amplifiers and filters which generate man-made microwave frequencies and
route them up to transmitter antennas through huge cables. Mounted on sector
supports aptly named alpha, beta and gamma, the antennas send and receive
these carcinogenic radio waves and their pulsed data packets at the speed of
light.
Posted on locked fences around the huts are "danger" warning signs. Hurtado
says, "You look around these sites and you find many dead birds on the
gravel. They can't take the radiation and they'll just die. You don't have
to ponder that too long to figure it's bad."
Hurtado doesn't know how much radiation he got on the job. He says there are
at least four connection spots inside the hut where radiation can leak. He
could not avoid the "heat" when he turned the radios on for testing and he
wonders if his cancer is the result. "When I first got hired, we had safety
meetings, but they pretty much minimized the hazards," he remembers. He was
issued no electromagnetic safety clothing and it was not until 2002 that he
got a radiation meter to wear. "The meter is supposed to warn you if you are
getting too much radiation," he says, "but I put mine on a stick and placed
it next to antennas and the alarm never went off."
A medical report in the International Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Health confirms that workers exposed to high levels of
RF/microwave radiation routinely have astronomical cancer rates.12 The
report notes that, for these workers, the latency period between high
radiation exposure and illness is short compared to less exposed populations
Hurtado says there are many industry workers who are dangerously
over-exposed. "I've talked to guys on power crews who have to climb around
the antennas and they've told me that before a work day is half over, they
start feeling really sick." He adds, "In my mind they are getting cooked."
Hurtado suspects that, since the early days of the wireless buildout, there
has been illegal activity related to public exposure from transmission sites
"I'm pretty sure," he says, "that some of the carriers are exceeding FCC
exposure limits. They can turn the radios and amplifiers up to get a bigger
footprint and they don't care if the alarms go on once the installers are
gone." Regulatory inspectors could identify violators because channels can
be spectrum analyzed. "But," he says, "there is just no one to check and I
believe that the public is getting way too much radiation now."
Regulators asleep at the wheel
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the single agency with
authority to regulate the broadcast/communications industry, has neither
money, manpower nor motive to properly monitor radiation output from
hundreds of thousands of commercial wireless installations spewing
carcinogenic waves across the nation. The FCC admits that physical testing
to verify compliance with emissions guidelines is relatively rare.
Critics say that FCC appointees, with virtually no medical or public health
expertise, represent an old-boy network and a cheering squad for the
telecommunications and broadcast industries. The Center for Public Integrity
found that FCC officials have been bribed by the industries with such perks
as expensive trips to Las Vegas.13
Dr. Carlo confirms that there is no regulatory accountability. He says, "You
have to go to those base stations and independently measure what is coming
out of them because we have had many instances where you have an antenna
that is allowed by law to transmit at 100 watts and we have seen up to 900
to 1000 watts. You can turn things up when nobody is looking."14
Neighborhood groups monitoring the broadcast/communications antenna farm on
Lookout Mountain near Denver, Colorado, have consistently found that,
despite protests to the FCC over nine years, radiation on the mountain has
been measured at up to 125 percent of exposure levels permitted by federal
law.15
Lethal exposure guidelines
Even if there were reliable compliance monitoring, many experts say that FCC
public exposure guidelines for RF/microwave radiation are deadly because
they are based on the obsolete and unfounded theory that only power density
hot enough to flash-cook tissues is harmful. This puts FCC at odds with
current scientific knowledge regarding the minimum exposure level at which
harm to living cells begins.
Myriad symptoms of radiation poisoning can be induced at exposure levels
hundreds, even thousands of times lower than current standards permit.
Russia's public exposure standards are 100 times more stringent than ours
because Russian scientists have consistently shown that, at U.S. exposure
levels, humans develop pathological changes in heart, kidney, liver and
brain tissues, plus cancers of all types.16
Norbert Hankin, chief of the EPA's Radiation Protection Division, has stated
that the FCC's exposure guidelines are protective only against effects
arising from a thermal (flash burn) mechanism. He concedes that, "the
generalization by many, that these guidelines protect human beings from harm
by any and all mechanisms, is not justified."17
Thus, public microwave exposure levels tolerated by the FCC and its
industry-loaded advisory committees are a national health disaster. Yet, for
pragmatic and lucrative reasons, federal exposure limits have been
deliberately set so high that no matter how much additional wireless
radiation is added to the national burden, it will always be "within
standards."
The FCC regulatory mess comes into focus with the Likely Mountain case.
Jasso says that when she and Garcia contacted the FCC regarding their
radiation injuries, they were met with an appalling lack of expertise and
concern. "FCC has no answers," Jasso says. "Their exposure guidelines are
convoluted and nonsensical. They refuse to address problems of multiple
antennas, field expansion, human body coupling and blood reversal because
they want to avoid regulatory problems at telecommunication sites." She adds
"FCC will fine a licensee thousands of dollars for not having a light
installed on top of a telecommunications tower, but they have not issued
even a warning letter to their licensees for the injuries that occurred on
Likely Mountain. They say injury cannot occur because their licensees are
regulated."
Catch 22
When Garcia and Jasso filed suit against companies operating microwave
transmitters on Likely Mountain, they could find no attorney who would take
their case and they were forced to proceed pro se. In August, 2007, a
California district court denied their claim, mainly on the grounds that
they had not proven that the defendants had exceeded FCC exposure guidelines
Under federal law the shattered health of 24 people, plus medical testimony
is not sufficient proof of negligence and liability.
Since FCC provides no enforcement monitoring at transmitter sites and since
the radiation industry is not required to prove with consistent
documentation that it is compliant, injured parties have little chance of
proving non-compliance because the damage to their health often becomes
obvious months or even years after their exposure.
The court worried that the Garcia-Jasso case highlights "the conflict
between the FCC's delegated authority to establish RF radiation guidelines
and limits and plaintiffs, attempt to establish that wireless facilities
like the one at Likely Mountain are ultrahazardous."So, while current
science provides ample evidence that FCC's guidelines are ultrahazardous,
the radiation industry hides behind FCC incompetence, simply because FCC
retains exclusive authority to set the standards.
The FCC's disastrous authority is calcified by the Telecommunications Act
(TCA) of 1996. The telecom industry is infamous for lavish "donations" which
keep legislators on its leash. Anticipating a national radiation health
crisis and the public backlash that would follow, the telecom lobby
blatantly bought itself a provision in the law that prohibits state and
local governments from considering environmental (health) effects when
siting personal wireless service facilities so long as "...such facilities
comply with the FCC's regulations concerning such emissions." Many say the
TCA insures that America's war on cancer will never be won, while protecting
gross polluters from liability.
On our own
After passage of the TCA, a group of scientists and engineers, backed by the
Communications Workers of America, filed suit in federal court. They hoped
the Supreme Court would review both the FCC's outdated exposure guidelines
and the legality of a federal law that severely impedes state and local
authority in the siting of hazardous transmitters. In 2001, the Supreme
Court refused to hear the case. The group's subsequent petition to the FCC
asking the agency to bring its exposure guidelines current with the latest
scientific data was denied.18
This is where we stand today. The public has no vote, no voice, no choice.
Chronic exposure to scientifically indefensible levels of DNA-ravaging
radiation is now compulsory for everyone in America. This is why Garcia and
Jasso are ill today; this why the industry enjoys unchallenged power to
place dangerous transmitters in residential and commercial areas with unsafe
setbacks and this is why untold thousands of Americans in buildings with
transmitters on the roof are given no safety warnings, though they work and
dwell in carcinogenic electromagnetic fields. In the meantime, the radiation
industry rakes in $billions in quarterly profits, none of which is set aside
for to pay for the national health catastrophe at hand.
Every citizen is now condemned to protect and defend himself against
radiation assault as best he can. There have been a number of lawsuits
against the radiation industry since cell towers began going up in backyards
across the nation. In 2001, a group action lawsuit was filed in South Bend,
Indiana, by families living in close proximity to towers. The complaint
describes health effects suffered by the plaintiffs, including heart
palpitations, interference with hearing, recurring headaches, short term
memory loss, sleep disturbances, multiple tumors, glandular problems,
chronic fatigue, allergies, weakened immune system, miscarriage and
inability to learn.19
The South Bend suit was settled out of court on the basis of nuisance and
decreased property values. Health claims don't hold water if emissions are
within FCC exposure standards. This case is valuable for understanding the
lunacy of FCC standards. The sick families enlisted the help of radiation
consultant Bill Curry, who honed his expertise as an engineer for Argonne
and Livermore labs. Dr. Curry found that one of the towers was irradiating
homes at over 65 microwatts per square centimeter.20 This power density is
well within federal exposure standards, which allow any neighborhood to be
zapped with at least 580 microwatts per square centimeter, or higher,
depending on the frequencies. If the families were sick at 65 microwatts/cm2
what would they be at 580? Considering that the Soviets used furtive Cold
War microwave bombardment to make US embassy personal radiation-sick at an
average exposure level of only .01 microwatts/cm2, America's clear and
present danger is obvious.21
How radiation sick is America?
Since the wireless revolution began wave-nuking the U.S. in the 1990s, there
have been no federally funded health studies to assess the cumulative
effects of ever-increasing communications radiation on public health. There
is no national database enabling citizens to study the location of
transmitters in their areas. Local and state governments can offer no
information on how much commercial wireless radiation is contaminating their
populations. When trying to find out who owns a tower or which companies
have transmitters on that tower, citizens usually hit a brick wall.
Dr. Carlo heads the only independent, post-market health surveillance
registry in the nation where people can report radiation illness. 22 Dr.
Carlo says the registry has heard from thousands of people who believe that
their illnesses, including brain and eye cancers, are due to
telecommunications radiation from both wireless phones and tower
transmitters. In the last two years, the registry has seen an upsurge in
reports as transmitters become ever more energetically dangerous in order to
accommodate increased data flow for new, multi-media technologies.
We can only guess how many Americans are in their graves today from
microwave assault. Arthur Firstenberg, who founded the Cellular Phone Task
Force, wrote that, on November 14, 1996, New York City's first digital
cellular provider activated thousands of PCS antennae newly erected on the
rooftops of apartment buildings. Health authorities reported that a severe
and lingering flu hit the city that same week. In response to its classified
newspaper ad advising that radiation sickness is similar to flu, the Task
Force heard back from hundreds of people who reported sudden onset symptoms
synchronous to microwave startup"symptoms similar to stroke, heart attack
and nervous breakdown.
Firstenberg then gathered statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and analyzed weekly mortality statistics published for 122 U.S.
cities. Each of dozens of cities recorded a 10-25 percent increase in
mortality, lasting two to three months, beginning in the week during which
that city's first digital cell phone network began commercial service.
Cities with no cellular system start up in the same time period showed no
abnormal increases in mortality. 23
Studies abroad
Recent health surveys in other nations confirm that people living close to
wireless transmitters are in big trouble:
In 2002, French medical specialists found that people living close to cell
towers suffered extreme sleep disruption, chronic fatigue, nausea, skin
problems, irritability, brain disturbances and cardiovascular problems.24
German researchers found that people living within 1,200 feet of a
transmitter site in the German city of Naila had a high rate of cancer and
developed their tumors on average eight years earlier than the national
average. Breast cancer topped the list.25
Spanish researchers found that people living within 1,000 feet of cellular
antennas had statistically significant illness at an average power density
of 0.11 to 0.19 microwatts /cm2, which is thousands of times less than
allowed by international exposure standards.26
An Egyptian medical study found that people living near mobile phone base
stations were at high risk for developing nerve and psychiatric problems,
plus debilitating changes in neurobehavioral function. Exposed persons had
significantly lower performance on tests for attention, short term auditory
memory and problem solving.27
Researchers in Israel studied people in the town of Netanya who had lived
near a cell tower for 3-7 years. They had a cancer rate four times higher
than the control population. Breast cancer was most prevalent. 28
Europe in an uproar
A new European Union poll of more than 27,000 people across the continent
reveals that 76 percent of respondents feel that they are being made ill by
wireless transmitters.29 Seventy-one percent in the UK believe they suffer
health effects from mast (cell tower) radiation. In April 2007, The London
Times reported a startling number of cancer clusters in mast neighborhoods.
One study in Warwickshire, found 31 cancers around a single street. 30 Some
sick Brits send their blood to a lab in Germany, which uses state of the art
methodology to confirm wireless radiation damage.
Radiation sickness is now so prevalent in Germany that 175 doctors have
signed the Bramberger Appeal, a document calling the situation a "medical
disaster." It asks the German government to initiate a national public
health investigation. This appeal closely follows the Freiburger Appeal,
signed by thousands of German doctors who say they are dealing with an
epidemic of severe and chronic diseases among both old and young patients
exposed to wireless microwave radiation. The head of the cancer registry in
Berlin found that one urban area with cellular antennas had a breast cancer
rate seven times the national average.31
Sweden was one of the first nations to go wireless. Swedish neuroscientist,
Dr. Olle Johansson, with hundreds of published papers to his credit, says
that a national epidemic of illness and disability was unleashed by the
wireless revolution. Long periods of sick leave, attempted suicides and
industrial accidents all increased simultaneously with introduction of
mobile phone radiation. Ninety-nine percent of the Swedish population is now
under duress of powerful third generation masts. Johansson reports that
people are plagued with sleep disorders, chronic fatigue that does not
respond to rest, difficulties with cognitive function and serious blood
problems. Recurrent headaches and migraines are a "substantial public health
problem," he says.32
Rooftop transmitters, which readily pass microwave radiation into structures
can be a death sentence. Across the world there are reports of cancer
clusters and extreme illness in office buildings and multi-tenant dwellings
where antennas are placed on rooftops directly over workers and tenants. In
2006, the top floors of a Melbourne University office building were closed
after a brain tumor cluster drew media attention to the risks of
communications transmitters on top of the building.33 Likewise, ABC's
Brisbane television complex, topped with satellite dishes and radio antennas
was the site of a well-publicized breast cancer cluster among workers.34
Deadlier death rays
In the meantime, the radiation cowboys of America are having a good ol time
because they know there's no sheriff in town. The commercial wireless
industry is relentless in its drive to construct thousands of new
transmitter sites in neighborhoods and schoolyards everywhere, while adding
more powerful antennas at its older sites. Countless WiFi systems, both
indoors and out, accommodate wireless laptop computers, personal digital
assistants, WiFi-enabled phones, gaming devices, video cameras, even parking
and utility meters. Hundreds of cities already have or are planning to fund
WiFi networks, each consisting of thousands of small microwave transmitters
bolted to buildings, street lamps, park benches and bus stops. Some networks
are being buried under sidewalks. These access points or "nodes" blast
carcinogenic energy at 2.4 to 5 gigahertz with virtually no warning signs
about radiation exposure. WiFi radiation is unregulated by the FCC.
Sprint-Nextel and Clearwire are now rolling out in U.S. cities tower-mounted
WiMAX transmitters providing wireless internet access "to die for." WiMAX is
WiFi on steroids. Upon startup of WiMAX transmitters near the Swedish
village of Gotene, the emergency room at the local hospital was flooded by
calls from people overcome with pulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms.35
WiMAX radiation could one day be cranked up to a bone-incinerating 66
gigahertz.36 A single WiMAX tower could provide internet coverage for an
area of 3,000 square miles, although coverage for 6-25 square miles is the
norm now. Promoters say WiMAX may some day replace all cable and DSL
broadband services and irradiate virtually all rural areas. Yet, not a
single environmental or public health study has been required as the
industry unleashes infrastructure for this savage new wireless technology
from which no living flesh will escape.
The commercial ray-peddlers are not alone in their quest to make the U.S. a
radiation wasteland. In August, 2007, Congress approved new Homeland
Security legislation which funds a program to "promote communications
compatibility between local, state and federal officials." We catch a
glimpse of what this portends as the state of New York gears up to erect
hundreds of new wireless installations for a "Statewide Wireless Network
(SWN)." This system will blanket 97 percent of the state, allowing agencies
at various government levels to communicate instantly while greatly adding
to the fog of commercial wireless pollution.37 The New York Office for
Technology says that the radiation power densities of the system will be
within FCC limits. That assurance should give us the shivers.
Angela's story
Angela Flynn, a 43-year-old caregiver, lives in Santa Cruz, California. Last
spring she took classes at a local church where wireless antennas were
concealed in a chimney on the building. She recalls, "Every muscle in my
body felt sore. And my joints were feeling creaky. My instructor mentioned
how people at the women's center on church property had similar symptoms.
During my sixth day I had a severe reaction. My short term memory was gone
and I was disoriented and confused. When the instructor asked a question, I
could not recall anything from the lecture."
At night, Angela could not sleep and she would lie awake, feeling her body
buzz. She became hypersensitive to other sources of electromagnetic
radiation. The symptoms became so bothersome that she canceled the rest of
her course. Using a chart for calculating cumulative, non-ionizing,
electromagnetic radiation exposure levels, she found that the classes
located only 100 feet from antennas in the building" had suffered the
highest possible exposure during peak operation. "It took a month before I
regained my health," she reports.
When Angela wrote letters to the church inquiring whether it was monitoring
the health of the people exposed to antenna radiation, church officials were
"unresponsive and dismissive." So Angela saw the light. She helped organize
a community group to put pressure on county officials for answers. After
hearing community testimony, officials directed the zoning department to
create a comprehensive map of county transmitter sites and to put together a
report on emissions testing.
Angela says, "We recently had a delay of an installation of a tower near a
middle school. The superintendent has even come out against the tower and
was instrumental in delaying the hearing on the site. He also arranged a
school board meeting on the issue." Angela's efforts to share critical
information with her community made a difference.
Conclusion
America must soon face its radiation cataclysm. The EMR Network says that
millions of workers occupy worksites on a daily basis where operating
antenna arrays are camouflaged and where no RF safety program is carried out
Thanks to shameless predatory advertising techniques, American youth are
now literally addicted to "texting," watching TV and accessing the Internet
on tiny wireless screens. These are the toys that keep cell towers and WiFi
hot spots buzzing. A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to
fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and
short-lived population.
Right now, 11.7 million Americans have been diagnosed with cancer. Because
humans can harbor cancer conditions for years before detection, additional
millions of cancer victims are yet undiagnosed. The Journal of Oncology
Practice predicts that, by 2020, there will be so many cancer cases in the U
S. that doctors may not be able to cope with their caseloads. The report
concludes the nation could soon face a shortage of up to 4,000 cancer
specialists.38
A recent CBS news series on the raging American cancer epidemic left viewers
with the mindset that trainloads of federal cash must flow if we are to find
the cancer answer. But a proven cancer initiator now inundates our cities,
roadways, schools, offices and homes. Any environmental stressor that
jackhammers human cells at millions to billions of cycles per second is a
cancer factor. Any wave-pollution that breaks the DNA and causes
pre-cancerous micronuclei in human blood is a cancer factor. Logic tells us
that there will be no "answer to cancer" until we eliminate the cancer
factors.
Wireless communications radiation is to America today what DDT, thalidomide,
dioxin, benzene, Agent Orange and asbestos were yesterday. Historically, the
truth about the public health menace of extreme toxins is never told until
thousands sicken and die.
Dr. Robert Becker, noted for decades of research on the effects of
electromagnetic radiation, has warned: "Even if we survive the chemical and
atomic threats to our existence, there is the strong possibility that
increasing electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading
to our extinction before we are even aware of them. All life pulsates in
time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all
organisms. These energies are too dangerous to entrust forever to
politicians, military leaders and their lapdog researchers." 39
Our mission to save the nation's health and restore sanity in the wireless
age seems daunting. The wireless juggernaut is an aggressive, mean machine.
Federal regulators are clearly compromised and incompetent to protect the
public health. Uninformed consumers dearly love their magic digital toys and
don't yet understand the connection between those toys and a national raging
cancer epidemic that may consume us all.
Powerful economic interests have lied to us long enough. Americans deserve
the facts. We need dialogue. Wireless radiation is a form of electronic
trespass. America must decide whose rights are more important"idlers beaming
death rays for piddling gibberish or the elderly with pacemakers who are
made ill by cell phone and tower radiation wherever they go. Must we all
prematurely perish so that wireless enthusiasts can capture cell phone
photos and instantly send them for processing via carcinogen express? Must
all neighborhoods become sick zones so that radiation addicts can receive
recipes, ads and other frivolous text messages on their cell phone toys?
Does a human being have the right to NOT be forcibly WiMAXED into a coffin,
or do only wireless providers and their devotees have rights?
What can we do?
We can commit to join the growing radiation awareness movement and continue
educating ourselves and others. We can employ digital and audio radiation
detectors to help safeguard our personal health and to demonstrate the
ceaseless brutality of ubiquitous wireless radiation which threatens the
genetic integrity of future generations. We can promote emerging
technologies that could make communications technologies safer.
We can demand that federal radiation exposure standards and setback
requirements be updated to reflect the realities of modern science. Federal
communications law must be rewritten so that local jurisdictions can regain
their right to consider health and environment when reviewing wireless
siting applications. We can insist that wireless emissions from transmitters
be drastically reduced as they are in Austria and Russia. We can demand
routine compliance testing at all transmitter sites. We can see to it that
people who have been living and working near powerful transmitters be given
opportunity to report their resulting illnesses in national surveys. Proper
epidemiological studies must be conducted and their results published and
broadly disseminated.
Each of us can break the seductive, but oppressive wireless habit ourselves.
We can play no game, use no wireless Internet system, make no trivial phone
call that necessitates enlarging America's dense forest of wireless
transmitters. If no one buys WiMAX-enabled devices and related services,
this dangerous system will fail.
Whenever possible, we can go back to the old-fashioned, corded phones and
message machines which made yesteryear a far more healthy time. Cordless
household and office phones emit powerful megahertz or gigahertz microwave
radiation, causing damage to hearing, eyesight and brain function. DECT
cordless phones irradiate a huge area even when not in use. We can encourage
others to contact us by conventional land line phones only. Can we enjoy a
leisurely conversation knowing that an irradiated caller risks disease and
disability for mindless chatter? What good is wireless convenience if it
means being ultimately tethered to a hospital bed? We can teach our children
that health is more important than passing convenience and instant
gratification.
According to OSHA, no environment should be deliberately made hazardous.
Backed by current scientific knowledge, we can refuse to work or shop in an
environment which endangers our health. We can demand that megahertz and
gigahertz cordless phones, walkie talkie radios, WLAN and WiFi systems be
removed from schools, offices, hospitals and any public place where people
are grossly irradiated without their informed consent. Second hand smoke is
bad; second hand radiation is worse.
We wish to thank the courageous radiation victims interviewed for this
report who have generously revealed the details of their personal suffering
in order to warn others. Following their example, we must continue undaunted
in the moral quest to protect the national health and restore the world to
sanity before it is too late.
Meters and resources
The Electrosmog Detector allows you to HEAR the intensity of RF/microwave
pollution in your environment. Developed by British radiation expert
Alasdair Phillips, this battery-operated device will quickly allow you to
identify dangerous RF/microwave hotspots, even where transmitters are
concealed, and take action to protect yourself. This meter is $99 (price
includes shipping) and can be obtained from HEARING IS BELIEVING, Box 64
Hayden, Idaho 83835. E-mail: <mailto:gzz%40icehouse.net>gzz@icehouse.net.
The Trifield Meter ($145), produced by Alpha Lab, is used mainly to measure
the milligauss of electromagnetic fields coming from 60 hertz sources. Use
this digital meter to make sure your living and working spaces are under 2
milligauss. Alpha Lab's Microwave Power Density Meter ($320) is a more
sensitive digital microwave meter that will help you assess the kilohertz,
megahertz and gigahertz radiation in our wireless environment. This
easy-read meter measures microwave radiation in microwatts per cm2, allowing
comparison of your readings to the power density used by the Russians to
make our embassy staff sick. Remember, people inside the embassy reportedly
received only about .01 microwatts per cm2. For more information, contact
Alpha Lab Inc., 1280 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101; (800)
658-7030; www.trifield.com
Alan Broadband produces radiation detection devices with models ranging in
price from $159 to $2,800. The $159 model, while not giving detailed
readings, is an extremely sensitive and sturdy instrument that gives an
accurate dial read on whether or not radiation is present and its relative
intensity. It lets you know when you are being irradiated and serves as an
excellent tool to illustrate exposure levels to others. For more information
contact Alan Broadband 93 Arch St., Redwood City, California 94062; (888)
369-9627; www.zapchecker.com
Books
Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and
Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001.
Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette, Robert C. Kane, Vantage Press, 2001.
Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard? The
Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, Edited by B. Blake Levitt, 2000.
Order from Barnes and Noble.
Websites
These websites provide excellent information on all aspects of health and
other issues relating to electromagnetic fields and radio
frequency/microwave radiation.
www.buergerwelle.com This excellent German (but in English) site features
RF/microwave radiation news from all over the world. The science keeps
pouring in and this is where to find it, along with lots of human interest.
www.cprnewsbureau.org This is an excellent source of up-to-date news on
wireless issues.
www.emrnetwork.org This site has superb resources organized by
professionals with expertise in all facets of our RF/microwave radiation
problem.
www.safewireless.org This site features Dr. Carlo's Mobil Telephone Health
Concerns Registry where people can report ill health effects from living
near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless devices. It also
features great news reports.
www.microwavenews.com This is home to Microwave News, an excellent monthly
publication. It offers cutting edge science reports, plus a great archive.
www.sageassociates.net This site provides valuable information on how to
make homes and offices safer in the wireless age.
CAUTION: There are many devices on the market claiming to protect wireless
users from radiation. These include: air tube headsets, ferrite bead
clip-ons and an array of paste-ons advertised to cut down on thermal effects
or deflect negative energy. Energy testing, kinesiology and meter readings
indicate that these mitigation devices DO NOT adequately protect against the
brutal force of near field microwave radiation. You can investigate the
effectiveness of these devices by metering radiation levels while using them
If radiation pours from your "safe" headset, don't bank your life on it. If
practiced in the art of kinesiology, you can also "muscle test" the
effectiveness of the radiation mitigation device. The human body becomes
very weak when irradiated with any man-made frequency, especially microwaves
If a protective device is really working, you will not detect muscle
weakness when the body is near a transmitting wireless phone or gadget.
OUR BEST TIP: If you want a safe household phone, find an AT&T corded
speaker phone 950, available at most large office supply stores. It emits no
microwave radiation, holds up to heavy use, has a great digital display
screen and allows hands-free conversation.
NOTES
1. Interview with Dr. Eckel was published by Schwabischen Post 12-07-06.
Find this interview at www.heseproject.org. See "The Cell Nucleus is
Mutating."
2. "Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation," a
paper presented by Dr. Lai to the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium,
October 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna. Also "DNA Damage and Cell Phone
Radiation," www.rfsafe.com, 11-02-05.
3. Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and
Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001, p.151.
4. "Mobile Telecommunications and Health"Summary of the ECOLOG study for
T-Mobile, 2000," Find this summary at www.hese-project.org.
5. "Cell Phone Radiation Harms DNA, Study Claims," (Reuters) MSNBC, 12-04-04
Also "Mobile Phone Radiation Harms DNA," R. Moss, CPR News Bureau, 10-16-06
6. "RF-Induced DNA Breaks Reported in China," Microwave News, 09-29-05. This
report comes from the Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
7. "2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human
cells," Lee S. et al, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, PubMed
16107253.
8. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review," a
public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent
dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
9. Few Americans know that cell phones have never been safety tested thanks
to the FDA, which exempted cell phones from pre-market testing based on a
low power exclusion" rule.
10. "The American Cancer Society is Misleading the Public," Dr. George Carlo
8-5-07. Find this statement at www.buergerwelle.com.
11. "Long-Term Mobile Phone Use Raises Brain Tumor Risk: Study," Reuters,
03-31-06. This research was conducted by the Swedish National Institute for
Working Life whose scientists studied 905 people with malignant brain tumors
to confirm a 240% increased risk of brain tumors after heavy mobile phone
use.
12. "Cancer in Radar Technicians Exposed to RF/Microwave Radiation: Sentinel
Episodes," Richter E. et al, Int. J. Occup Environ Health 6 (3):187-193,
2000.
13. "FCC Lives Large off Lobbyist Bribes," Capitol Hill Blue, 05-22-03,
capitolhillblue.com.
14. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review,"
public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent
dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
15. See <<http://www.c-a-r-e.org/>http://www.c-a-r-e.org/>www.c-a-r-e.org for information about
groups affected by Lookout Mountain broadcast antennas.
16. For an excellent chart comparing biological effects at power density
levels and a list of international exposure standards, go to: "Radio Wave
Packet," Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force, Sept 2001; also find
this power density list at: "Analysis of Health and Environmental Effects of
Proposed San Francisco Earthlink WiFi Network, Magda Havas, Ph.D, Trent
University, May 2007.
17. Quote from letter by Norbert Hankin, chief environmental scientist with
EPA's Radiation Protection Division. This letter was received by EMR Network
7-16-02 and can be found at www.emrnetwork.org.
18. "Supreme Court Rebuffs Challenge to U.S. Tower Policy," Microwave News,
Jan./Feb 2001; also EMR Network Petition For Inquiry To Consider Amendment
of Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules Concerning the Environmental Effects of
Radiofrequency Radiation, September 25, 2001. See also FCC order to deny
application for review filed by the EMR Network, adopted July 28, 2003.
These documents found at www.emrnetwork.org.
19. Hicks, Onnink, Barber, Pennington v. Horvath Communications, Cause No
71C01-0107-CP St. Joseph Circuit Court, St Joseph County, Indiana.
20. "Some Unexpected Health Hazards Associated with Cell Tower Siting," Bill
P. Curry, PhD., Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard?
The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, edited by B. Blake Levitt,
2000. See chapter 6.
21. Practical Guidelines to Protect Human Health Against Electromagnetic
Radiation Emitted in Mobile Telephony, Summary June 2001, Miguel Muntane
Condeminas, industrial engineer for Consulting Comunicacio i Disseny S.L,
Barcelona, <mailto:m.co-di@eic.ictnet.es>m.co-di@eic.ictnet.es. See Section
4.3.1 "US Embassy in Moscow Study."
22. See www.health-concerns.org and <<http://www.safewireless.org/>http://www.safewireless.org/>www
safewireless.org. These sites provide a pathway to access Dr. Carlo's Mobil
Telephone Health Concerns Registry where people can report ill health
effects from living near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless
devices.
23. "Electromagnetic Fields, (EMF) Killing Fields," Arthur Firstenberg, The
Ecologist, v. 34, n. 5, 6-10-2004.
24. "Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone
base stations: I. influences of distance and sex," R. Santini et al,
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées"laboratoire de
biochimie-pharmacologie, 2002.
25. "Cancer Risks from Microwaves Confirmed," Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Institute of
Science in Society press release, 5-24-07.
26. "The Microwave Syndrome"a preliminary study in Spain," Navarro E. et al,
Biology and Medicine, 22 (2 &3) 161-169, 2003; also " The Microwave Syndrome
Further Aspects of a Spanish Study," Oberfeld G et al 2004, International
Conference Proceedings, Kos, Greece 2004.
27. "Neurobehavioral Effects Among Inhabitants Around Mobile Phone Base
Stations," Abdel-Rassoul et al, Neurotoxicology, 8-01-2006.
28. "Increase of Cancer Near Cell-Phone Transmitter Station," Wolf D. and
Wolf, International Journal of Cancer Prevention 1-2, April 2004.
29. "Two in Three Believe Radiation from Phones Damaged their Health,"
Geoffrey Lean, 7-8-07 Independent on Sunday, U.K.
30. "Cancer Cluster at Phone Masts, " Times On Line, The Sunday Times, UK
4-22-07.
31. Report by Roland Stabenow, 9-21-06, head of cancer registry in Berlin.
32. "How Shall We Cope With the Increasing Amounts of Airborne Radiation?"
Olle Johansson, Journal of the Australasian College of Environmental
Medicine, Dec. 2006.
33. "Building Top Floors Closed After Brain Tumor Alert," Lisa Macnamara,
The Australian, UK, 05-13-07. Read this report at www.rense.com.
34. "Cancer Strikes 12 Female Staffers," Tony Koch, Omega-News, 4-06-07.
35. "Swedes Hit Hard By WiMax, 6-12-06. This story says that the Swedish
media reported that in the town of Gotene, the hospital emergency room was
flooded with calls regarding headaches, difficulty breathing, blurry vision
and heart problems upon WiMAX start-up. At least 5 people had to leave their
homes.
36. "How WiMAX Works," E. Grabianowski and M. Brain, www.computer
howstuffworks.com.
37. "250-foot Tower Raises New Bellevue Fears, John Hopkins, Cheektowaga
Times, 8-09-2007; See also "Congress Approves Homeland Security Bill,"
Spencer Hsu, Washington Post 08-07-07.
38. Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, March 2007: 79-86.
39. Robert Becker, The Body Electric, 1986.
<http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025>http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7025