http:///www.allcreatorsgift.org is back up after six months of being shut down!!

Forums to be up soon!

As no one else on this forum seems to want to tell you the facts so you can see how you were defrauded of your title to the land..I will ...Rather than solutions I see a lot of fear mongering and confusing false info being posted.....Do not doubt you will be infiltrated by those of ill minds and financial needs prompting their sour reactions to suffering from a lack of knowledge themselves.

I will offer all you seeking truth these links to start you off.

My video link is at the end and the last link amongst the dozens of others that will open your eyes!

Private agreements are always best if you are the one with the facts.

Blessings



These links below may help you as well
If one continues to surf the site where you find Canada as a trading
Corporation listed with the US security;

then you will also find "Ontario Province of":


http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?ac...nclude&count=40

"Quebec Province of"

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?ac...nclude&count=40

"British Columbia Province of"

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?ac...mpany&CIK=14306

Note it is listed as a Realestate Company! BC and all the first Nation unclaimed is up for sale!! China is the top bidder as they already bought Prince George


You will see by the *short list* of documents, although voluminous,
partially indicates the diligense that has been extended to bring as many
private men and women into awareness of ourn faith as *possible to
avert and abate assumption we are corporate entities subject to corporate
law.*
**
*I have dozens of other communications but suffice to say I think you can
see a crime taking place and if not in the knowledge of one involved it
absolves him from responsibility, take note that once in the awareness of
the crime those participating must stop or misfeasance of public office
malicious prosecution, bad faith and criminal intent is implied.*
**

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa39...411/ai_n9467708

A TOPlC RARELY TALKED about in public procurement, or even within
governments generally, is the possibility of a government official abusing
the powers of their office for improper reasons. Given the currency of the
topic, however, in this article we seek to shed some light on what could
become tomorrow's headline, the tort of misfeasance in public office.

In common law, persons who exercise the legal powers of the Crown (called
public officers or public officials) are subject to a tort (civil wrong)
action if they abuse their powers. Called in law misfeasance in a public
office, this tort was first created in England in a case called Ashby v.
White (1703) 92 E.R. 126, where a person, maliciously and fraudulently
deprived of their right to vote by an election official, sued the election
official for damages and won.

The tort came to Canada in a case called Roncarelli v. Duplesis [1959] S.C.R.
121, where the Quebec premier improperly ordered the manager of the Quebec
Liquor Commission to revoke Roncarelli's liquor license because Roncarelli
had provided bail money to several Jehovah's Witnesses whom Duplessis had
had arrested. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) found the premier had no
grounds for ordering this, did not even have the power to make such an
order, and had done so only out of malice.



That malice is being demonstrated by the private men and women acting as
Judges Police and ministers in ignorance of the communications to them.
They have all been served with the private knowledge and had a duty via 180
of the criminal code and as senior officials had a duty to inform others not
to intimidate men and women of faith nor obstruct their ability to practice
their faith as per 176 and 423 of the code that applies to them..
**
*Minister Donald Christpher Carter has already communicated to Mr. Lufty as
of 2003* as you will see when open his document that was sent registered
mail to over 70 officials in their private capacity.

*It appears we have a deliberate conspiracy taking place*.

*This email will be used as evidense of awareness on the part of senior
staffers of this fraud and criminal activity that is transpiring on the part
of revenue justice and Federal Court judges and clerks alike or anyone who
comes into awareness of a crime and ignores their duty to act.*
**
I am including a set of links and a Video of myself at the end explaining
the situation and educating about God's law his people and what he deceed
happen to those who stiff necked refused to follow his law.

An Archist is one who follows mans laws. A deist is one who follows God's
laws. A or An as a prefix to a word such a moral means the opposte or in
the case of Archist an Anarchist ,which means in english opposed to mans
laws, like Yahushua, the hebrew name for Christ, was..

Since you spoke of fictions I will refer you to Dueteronomy the great book
of law in chapter 1 verse 17 and chapter 10 verse 17 then I will guide you
to Acts 10:34 and Romans 2:11 then finally and definitively to James 2:9. *I
or our faiths members can not show respect to or be persons!*

I know the meaning of the word per sona is with sound. I also know it
meant and was used to refer to a mask worn by a player in a stage...a
fiction.

I am a man not an individual as both person and individual, as written in
corporate law , refer to corporate members as in a parternership or a
business like commercial relationship.

Matthew 6:24 says to not partake of mammon which is commerce which is the
corporate dead. We are not to have communion with the dead flesh or formed
dead thing Andrew. God forbids it!.

God makes this clear in the action of Saul in bringing up the dead spirit of
Samuel.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_...r=28&version=31

Please take your time read all of this below to grasp how powerful it is and

why Canadian treasury was briefed about this by Cameron McEwan senior
analyst for Treasury who still works there albeit in a reduced capacity..

They agreed with all of the facts as being irrefutable
as of the Queen's letter to them saying she was in reciept of the
petition. This is powerful history and some of you may have prejudices
that may wish to reject this but the facts got treasury to say uncle!!

I in quest of truth have been following the freedom movement since
1999 and have seen some amazing things take place in the battle for
supremacy.

Of all the most influential was the fact that the Queen, head of all
the justice systems with the Govenor General as head under her, is sworn to
be
defending the laws of God.

That along with the facts I show you that the laws of the government
of Canada or the commonweath do not apply to you are quite startling I
hope you will not be blinded by these shockers.. They prove you do
not have to go to defacto courts to have problems solved

You can only come out of Babylon if you are aware.

Now once aware of the following irrefutable facts and you still wish
to submitt to imposters you may wish to question your logic.

Blessings.
From Minister Belanger



Slavery , and how to stop Codex
Alimentarius and removal of Farmers seed
by Minister of Christ Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger Monday June 28, 2004
at 06:58 AM
owlmonone@yahoo.ca or owlmon@gmail.com

What is Slavery??? What is forced taxation??? How can parlimentarians
sworn allegiant to a Christian Monarch, who is defender of the
Christian faith and Biblical law, support gay marriage? How about
taking away God's herbs?....... How about making you bow to false
law or god????? Is this with God's scriptural approval? Will they proceed
to force you to bow to a false god in
court if they know of your faith beforehand??> Will the Queen be
amused???

Did she as a Christain Monarch take an oath to defend the laws of God
of the King James Bible?

http://www.oremus.org/liturgy/coronation/cor1953b.html

Was it based upon the words of the 1689 version? Or was it minutely
altered with no legal method to do so?

http://www.worldfreeinternet
.net/parliament/oath.htm< http://www.worldfreeinternet.net/parliament/oath.htm >

http://www.jacobite.ca/documents/16890409.htm


Is their a law regarding that faith and the defense thereof by those
who took an oath to the King's and Queens?
http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.ht...f_of_faith.html
see section 22

This story is proof positive of what i am saying will take place if
you stand in your faith if assauted by unlawful forces!!!
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/1948.html
This actually happened as I am first hand witness to the events. The
prosecutor backed down immediately!!!! Do not be prejudiced as of
God's gift lest you blaspheme his creation

Can they our so called sworn allegiants to the defender of the faith
really ban the ability to store seed? Our farmers own seed? The
simple answer is yes if we allow it! We allow it by not claiming it
as God's gift!

All herbs bearing seed are a gift of God with no repentance required.
Romans 11:29. How can God's gift to man and woman be outlawed or
removed from your ability to possess it in those countries that have
Bibles in their courts?

Do we get say about this?

From whence do they get their authority in those countries that
recognise God as Supreme? From the Bible if they are dejure. From
thin air if they are de facto!

Who will stand for their faith the way Christ himself showed us?

I will show you how with registered mail to private men and women as
per Matthew 18:15-20 that everything can change in a short time.
Class actions against private men and women in charge of bringing in
Codex will wake them up as to their inability to get corporate
defense. They will also be suffering from an inability to get
competent(R. v Mckibbon 1988 Ezekiel 33:6) private defense.

Genesis 1:29 and Romans 11:29 ensures the rule of law is clear!

The King James Bible has Standing in commonwealth courts! That means
it cannot be argued with!

That link will expose the underbelly of the beast that drives Codex!

Who is responsible for the charging of interest or what God refers to
as usury?? Are we compelled to violate God's command and pay
interest??

http://www.tentmaker.org/lists/UsuryScriptureList.html

http://www.iahushua.com/WOI/conman2.html

Is the world bank owned by ethnic affiliation???

http://www.wealth4freedom.com/Rothschild.html


http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-4....html#rid-71224


Is the Talmud ruling the world and law?

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/index.html

I strongly encourage you to read as much as you can on this site as it
will show you how powerful Talmud is and how to circumvent it's power
over you.It already has invoked taxes upon you and now is pushing for
the Medpharm control of it all with Codex. Yes Talmud was responsible
for all that.

Are you supposed to bow to false authority???
Exodus 20:3-5 God's word is final . Deuteronomy 4:15-19; 5:7-10; 12:2-3

Are you a child of Israel or a slave??

http://mindprod.com/kjv/Leviticus/25.html25:44

Both thy bondmen, and
thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are
round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
25:45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among
you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you,
which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
25:46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after
you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for
ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule
one over another with rigour.


God is telling us if we are strangers to his law and do not follow
after his law as if we fail to follow we will be enslaved.



Have you been bought and sold as a* person*?


This below is touted as a Canadian petroleum and gas producers act.
Your body produces oil and gas. Why is their a listed value to your
life listed there if it is about petroleum ?

Please keep in mind the Canadian treasury Board was briefed on this
and said I was correct.

Notice the buying a selling of persons and the definitions

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/32270.html



control status" means, with respect to a person, whether or not the
person is Canadian controlled as determined under this Act and the
regulations;


"direct equity percentage" �pourcentage de participation directe�

"direct equity percentage" means, with respect to formal equity owned
by a person in any particular person,

(a) where the particular person does not have more than one class of
formal equity within the meaning of the regulations, the percentage of
the formal equity of the particular person that is owned by the person
, and



"owned" �poss�der�

"owned" means, subject to the regulations, beneficially owned, and the
words "owner" and "ownership" have corresponding meanings;


"person" �personne�

*"person" means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a trust, a
government, an agency of government, a segregated fund within the
meaning of the regulations and an organization that is prescribed as
being a person or that falls into a class of organizations prescribed
as being persons;*

*Individual what? Individual fictions?*

*Did you read the word "man" in there?
***
Is their a value to your life?

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-431/71221.html#rid
-71224 < http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-4....html#rid-71224 >

Remember 12.7% a year is what is collected on the annuity of your
bond. *That bond is what gives value to the currency in circulation as
you in a bonded form are used* a*s surety for the* *negotiable instrument
of value*
internationally.

Who or what is a false God ? Exodus 20:3-5

One who writes law in excess of or in derogation to God or acts like a
God overwriting YeHoVaH's law, is a false god. Acts 12:21-23

Deuteronomy 4:2 the eleventh commandment and 12:32 chiming in commands
what to not do with his law.

Does the government of Canada have a legitimate Governor General or an
imposter* that has usuped the power*???? Lets examine that.

http://www.gg.ca/governor_*general*/role_e.asp < http://www.gg.ca/governor_general/role_e.asp>
look for defacto

What does de facto mean??? Why must we know? Ignorance is no excuse
Hosea 4:6 section 19 of mans criminal code!

http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-46/sec19.html

http://www.lawinfo.com/lawdictionary/dict-d.htm
http://www.pixi.com/~kingdom/defacto.html

The creditor for Canada defines defacto

http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...E0?OpenDocument
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...ce?OpenDocument

Can one word like defacto, mean we are under the power of an
illegitimate false god usurped government?? Are we supposed to bow
to their godless commands? What did Shadrack Meshak and Abednigo do
in Daniel Chapter 3? they refused to bow! Did Daniel eat the Kings
food? He refused as of God's food ordinance! Daniel Chapter 1

Why does *Michaelle Jean* say she is de facto??? Is she being
Honest and truthful?

Why does the world bank say de facto means usurped authority and an
abrogated constitution ?

http://wbln0018.worldbank.org /Institutional/Manuals/OpManual.nsf/%200/5CE3BA026987F1C78525672C007D07E0?OpenDocument


Will you bow to a false god regime???? Will you violate God's first
command? Exodus 20:3-5. Have you been royally conned just like
millions before you? 2Peter 2:3

Do the provinces tell Church's if they register they have to give up
God's law? Yes they do!! This is hard to believe but is true
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/e...ecial_religious < http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/e...ecial_religious >

See section 6.5

Did you know the word constitutor defined in Blacks law dictionary,
and others as well, means *one who by simple agreement becomes
responsible for anothers debt*?

Did you agree to pay anothers debt? When? How? Whose debt was it? Was
it lawfully obtained?

http://usa-the-republic.com/revenue/Britian-Pontiff.html

Does Canada's parliament makes laws in excess of God's law?

Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32 says no!

They do it Every day they sit!

I still cannot find the Income tax act in the Bible. * Can't find it
in the parliamentary Clerks office nor the Clerk of the Senates
Office. Still looking.
no original posting in the Canada Gazette either!!!*


Ezra 7:23-26 and Numbers 15:15 may help with whose law applies while
were looking!

Do they as lawmakers also make laws that take away from God's law?

Big Drug Case removed the Lord's Day Act

http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/timePortals/mil...nes/116mile.asp

Then their is abortion.....

Are taxes via usury *and *fraud lawful? What does God say?

http://www.reformation.org/moneychangers.html

What did Jesus really mean when he said "render unto Caesar"

http://sw.jeffotto.com/render.htm

Did you know that section 32 of the Canadian supreme law the charter
of rights and freedoms says it only applies to the government and that
it does not apply to private individuals? ?? Mans law does not apply
unless you are government!!

http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pdp -hrp/canada/guide/application _e.cfm
< http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pdp-hrp/canada/...plication_e.cfm >

Are you defacto government?? Are you an individual?

Are you a Person , *or God's creation of a man or woman . Choose one*.

From the federal court act"

person" ? personne ?

"person" includes ( means *only what is shown*)a tribunal, an unincorporated
association and a partnership.

(personne)

"plaintiff" ? demandeur ?

"plaintiff" includes a person on whose behalf an action is commenced.

(demandeur)

Do you know where the origin of the word person comes from?

Latin. Persona : from greek per=with, sona=sound. A hollow mask worn
by a player on a stage used to reverberate and throw the sound of an
actors voice to the distant audience; a fiction.

Are you a mask? Are you a fiction? Did God create you as man?

What does God have to say about persons? Deuteronomy 1:17; 10:17;Acts
10:34; Romans 2:11; James 2:9 tells us God has no respect for persons
and if we should show respect to persons we commit sin!!

What law applies to those who are not deemed government??

Are you government? Do you fit this definition?

http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/repository/6legisln
/02cc/60211800.html< http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/repos...211800.html>

Numbers 15:15 is the law that applies

Re read the preamble at the beginning of Canada's supreme law ,the
Canadian Constitution, as you are made an offer there. God's rule of
law as supreme!!

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/index.html#charte

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

"Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the
supremacy of God and the rule of law:"

Will you accept the offerOr the other offer of mans law below
it......You know sections 1-52

This next, is Canada's master enactment for commerce.

The Canadian BIll of Exchange act, mans law ,only applys to government
and says in section 55 that if you were under intimidation as in
threat and duress


Holder in Due Course


Holder in due course

55. (1) A holder in due course is a holder who has taken a bill,
complete and regular on the face of it, under the following
conditions, namely,

(a) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without
notice that it had been previously dishonoured, if such was the fact;
and

( that he took the bill in good faith and for value, and that at the
time the bill was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in
the title of the person who negotiated it.


Title defective

(2) In particular, the title of a person who negotiates a bill is
defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the bill, or
the acceptance thereof, by fraud, duress or force and fear, or other
unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates
it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a
fraud. ( altering your name on any bill without your permission for a
financial purpose is fraud. You simply were never taught to
caplitalize your name nor reverse it and no law of grammer or man
allows it!

They cannot proceed against God's creation as of their oath to the
Queen so they proceed against a fiction hoping you will volunteer
yourself by accepting the name change without a quibble.) Tacit
consent is nihil dicit he says nothing and is consenting.

Look at your drivers license! Everything the government sends is a
bill of exchange!

R.S., c. B-5, s. 56.


Right of subsequent holder

56. A holder, whether for value or not, who derives his title to a
bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to
any fraud or illegality affecting it , has all the rights of that
holder in due course as regards the acceptor and all parties to the
bill prior to that holder.

R.S., c. B-5, s. 57.


Presumption of value

57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party
thereto for value.


Presumed holder in due course

(2) Every holder of a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, deemed to be a holder in due course, but if, in an action on
a bill, it is admitted or proved that the acceptance, issue or
subsequent negotiation of the bill is affected with fraud, duress or
force and fear, or illegality, the burden of proof that he is the
holder in due course is on him, unless and until he proves that,
subsequent to the alleged fraud or illegality, value has in good faith
been given for the bill by some other holder in due course .

R.S., c. B-5, s. 58.




152. (1) Where a bill has been protested for non-payment, any person
may intervene and pay it under protest for the honour of any party
liable thereon or for the honour of the person for whose account the
bill is drawn.


If more than one offer

(2) Where two or more persons offer to pay a bill for the honour of
different parties, the person whose payment will discharge most
parties to the bill has the preference.


Refusal to receive payment

(3) Where the holder of a bill refuses to receive payment under
protest, he loses his right of recourse against any party who would
have been discharged by that payment . ( you read it here first, Wow
Eh?)


Entitled to bill

(4) The payer for honour, on paying to the holder the amount of the
bill and the notarial expenses incidental to its dishonour, is
entitled to receive both the bill itself and the protest.


Liability for refusing

(5) Where the holder does not on demand in a case described in
subsection (4) deliver up the bill and protest, he is liable to the
payer for honour in damages.

Can you intimidate or obstruct a man or woman with civil law from
doing God's business according to mans law the criminal code? Lets
see!




Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman

176. (1) Every one who

(a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or
endeavours to obstruct or prevent a clergyman or minister from
celebrating divine service or performing any other function in
connection with his calling , or(RonCarelli Vs Duplessis 1959)
SupremeCourtCanada
http://www.summitconnects.com/Articles_Col...s/200412_12.pdf
)

( knowing that a clergyman or minister is about to perform, is on
his way to perform or is returning from the performance of any of the
duties or functions mentioned in paragraph (a)

(i) assaults or offers any violence to him, or

(ii) arrests him on a civil process, or under the pretence of
executing a civil process ,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding two years.


Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings

(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of
persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent
purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.




(3) Every one who, at or near a meeting referred to in subsection (2),
wilfully does anything that disturbs the order or solemnity of the
meeting is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 172.



Idem






Intimidation


Common nuisance




Definition





423. (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an
offence punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without
lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to
abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do,
or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from
doing,

(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or his or her
spouse or common-law partner or children, or injures his or her
property ;

( intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of
that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other
injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or her or a
relative of his or hers, or that the property of any of them will be
damaged;




Common nuisance

180. (1) Every one who commits a common nuisance and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety or health of the public, or

( causes physical injury to any person,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding two years.


Definition

(2) For the purposes of this section, every one commits a common
nuisance who does an unlawful act or fails to discharge a legal duty
and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety, health, property or comfort of the public;
or

( obstructs the public in the exercise or enjoyment of any right
that is common to all the subjects of Her Majesty in Canada.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 176.







http://www.reformed.org/documents/westmins...ith.html#chap22

The law regarding lawful oaths that is still in force but not being
enforced,,,why???
CHAPTER XXII.
Of Lawful Oaths and Vows.

I. A lawful oath is a part of religious wors hip, wherein upon just
occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he
asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or
falsehood of what he sweareth.

II. The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and
therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore
to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to
swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet,
as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word
of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful
oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be
taken.

III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness
of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is
fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath
to any thing but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to
be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to
refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed
by lawful authority.

IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words,
without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin;
but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance,
although to a man's own hurt: nor is it to be violated, although made
to heretics or infidels.

V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be
made with the like religious care , and to be performed with the like
faithfulness.

VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone: and that
it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and
conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for
obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to
necessary duties, or to other things, so far and so long as they may
fitly conduce thereunto.

VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or
what would hinder any duty therein commanded, or which is not in his
own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or
ability from God. In which respects, monastical vows of perpetual
single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from
being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and
sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.

So you can follow the Advise of Ephesians 6:10-20 and Jesus at Matthew
18:15-20 and you will be almost there.

Blessings

So who has used this defense? I have. here a few letters from others.

http://melbimc.nomasters.org/news/2003/10/55720.php


http://vancouver.indymedia.org /news/?comments=yes&medium=text&keyword=Radau





http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:DPMK0...g.uk/en/2002/12 /49131.html+Golden+Jubilee+Petition+Edward-Jay-Robin:+Belanger&hl=en





John 5:39, 46-47. Search the scriptures, for in them ye think ye have
eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. ... For had ye
believed Moses, you would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if
ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

God is telling us if we are strangers to his law and do not follow
after his law we will be enslaved.



Have you been bought and sold as a person?


This below is touted as a Canadian petroleum and gas producers act.
Your body produces oil and gas. Why is their a listed value to your
life listed there if it is about petroleum ?

Please keep in mind the Canadian treasury Board was briefed on this
and said I was correct.

Notice the buying a selling of persons and the definitions

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/32270.html



control status" means, with respect to a person, whether or not the
person is Canadian controlled as determined under this Act and the
regulations;


"direct equity percentage" �pourcentage de participation directe�

"direct equity percentage" means, with respect to formal equity owned
by a person in any particular person,

(a) where the particular person does not have more than one class of
formal equity within the meaning of the regulations, the percentage of
the formal equity of the particular person that is owned by the person
, and



"owned" �poss�der�

"owned" means, subject to the regulations, beneficially owned, and the
words "owner" and "ownership" have corresponding meanings;


"person" �personne�

"person" means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a trust, a
government, an agency of government, a segregated fund within the
meaning of the regulations and an organization that is prescribed as
being a person or that falls into a class of organizations prescribed
as being persons;

Is their a value to your life?

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-20/SOR-84-4....html#rid-71224

Remember 12.7% a year is what is collected on the annuity of your
bond. That bond is what gives value to the currency in circulation as
you in a bonded form are used a negotiable instrument of value
internationally.

Who or what is a false God ? Exodus 20:3-5

One who writes law in excess of or in derogation to God or acts like a
God overwriting YeHoVaH's law, is a false god. Acts 12:21-23

Deuteronomy 4:2 the eleventh commandment and 12:32 chiming in commands
what to not do with his law.

Does the government of Canada have a legitimate Governor General or an
imposter???? Lets examine that.

http://www.gg.ca/governor_general/role_e.asp look for defacto

What does de facto mean??? Why must we know? Ignorance is no excuse
Hosea 4:6 section 19 of mans criminal code!

http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-46/sec19.html

http://www.lawinfo.com/lawdictionary/dict-d.htm
http://www.pixi.com/~kingdom /defacto.html

The creditor for Canada defines defacto

http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...E0?OpenDocument
http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...ce?OpenDocument

Can one word like defacto, mean we are under the power of an
illegitimate false god usurped government?? Are we supposed to bow
to their godless commands? What did Shadrack Meshak and Abednigo do
in Daniel Chapter 3? they refused to bow! Did Daniel eat the Kings
food? He refused as of God's food ordinance! Daniel Chapter 1

Why does Adrienne Clarkson say she is de facto??? Is she being
Honest and truthful?

Why does the world bank say de facto means usurped authority and an
abrogated constitution ?

http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutiona...E0?OpenDocument


Will you bow to a false god regime???? Will you violate God's first
command? Exodus 20:3-5. Have you been royally conned just like
millions before you? 2Peter 2:3

Do the provinces tell Church's if they register they have to give up
God's law? Yes they do!! This is hard to believe but is true
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/e...ecial_religious

See section 6.5

Did you know the word constitutor defined in Blacks law dictionary,
and others as well, means one who by simple agreement becomes
responsible for anothers debt?

Did you agree to pay anothers debt? When? How? Whose debt was it? Was
it lawfully obtained?

http://usa-the-republic.com/revenue/Britian-Pontiff.html

Does Canada's parliament makes laws in excess of God's law?

Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32 says no!

They do it Every day they sit!

I still cannot find the Income tax act in the Bible. Can't find it
in the parliamentary Clerks office nor the Clerk of the Senates
Office. Still looking.



God condemns homosexuality!

http://www.myfortress.org/Sodomite.html

Ezra 7:23-26 and Numbers 15:15 may help with whose law applies while
were looking!

Do they as lawmakers also make laws that take away from God's law?

Big Drug Case removed the Lord's Day Act

http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/en/timePortals/mil...nes/116mile.asp

Then their is abortion.....

Are taxes via usury fraud and lawful? What does God say?

http://www.reformation.org/moneychangers.html

What did Jesus really mean when he said "render unto Caesar"

http://sw.jeffotto.com/render .htm <http://sw.jeffotto.com/render.htm>

Did you know that section 32 of the Canadian supreme law the charter
of rights and freedoms says it only applies to the government and that
it does not apply to private individuals? ?? Mans law does not apply
unless you are government!!

http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pdp-hrp/canada/...plication_e.cfm

Are you defacto government?? Are you an individual?

Are you a Person , or God's creation of a man or woman . Choose one.

From the federal court act"

person" ? personne ?

"person" includes ( means only as show)a tribunal, an unincorporated
association and a partnership.

(personne)

"plaintiff" ? demandeur ?

"plaintiff" includes a person on whose behalf an action is commenced.

(demandeur)

Do you know where the origin of the word person comes from?

Latin. Persona : from greek per=with, sona=sound. A hollow mask worn
by a player on a stage used to reverberate and throw the sound of an
actors voice to the distant audience; a fiction.

Are you a mask? Are you a fiction? Did God create you as man?

What does God have to say about persons? Deuteronomy 1:17; 10:17;Acts
10:34; Romans 2:11; James 2:9 tells us God has no respect for persons
and if we should show respect to persons we commit sin!!

What law applies to those who are not deemed government??

Are you government? Do you fit this definition?

http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/yj/repos...c/60211800.html

Numbers 15:15 is the law that applies

Re read the preamble at the beginning of Canada's supreme law ,the
Canadian Constitution, as you are made an offer there. God's rule of
law as supreme!!

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/index.html#charte

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

"Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the
supremacy of God and the rule of law:"

Will you accept the offerOr the other offer of mans law below
it......You know sections 1-52

This next, is Canada's master enactment for commerce.

The Canadian BIll of Exchange act, mans law ,only applys to government
and says in section 55 that if you were under intimidation as in
threat and duress


Holder in Due Course


Holder in due course

55. (1) A holder in due course is a holder who has taken a bill,
complete and regular on the face of it, under the following
conditions, namely,

(a) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without
notice that it had been previously dishonoured, if such was the fact;
and

( that he took the bill in good faith and for value, and that at the
time the bill was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in
the title of the person who negotiated it.


Title defective

(2) In particular, the title of a person who negotiates a bill is
defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the bill, or
the acceptance thereof, by fraud, duress or force and fear, or other
unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates
it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a
fraud. ( altering your name on any bill without your permission for a
financial purpose is fraud. You simply were never taught to
caplitalize your name nor reverse it and no law of grammer or man
allows it!

They cannot proceed against God's creation as of their oath to the
Queen so they proceed against a fiction hoping you will volunteer
yourself by accepting the name change without a quibble.) Tacit
consent is nihil dicit he says nothing and is consenting.

Look at your drivers license! Everything the government sends is a
bill of exchange!

R.S., c. B-5, s. 56.


Right of subsequent holder

56. A holder, whether for value or not, who derives his title to a
bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to
any fraud or illegality affecting it , has all the rights of that
holder in due course as regards the acceptor and all parties to the
bill prior to that holder.

R.S., c. B-5, s. 57.


Presumption of value

57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party
thereto for value.


Presumed holder in due course

(2) Every holder of a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, deemed to be a holder in due course, but if, in an action on
a bill, it is admitted or proved that the acceptance, issue or
subsequent negotiation of the bill is affected with fraud, duress or
force and fear, or illegality, the burden of proof that he is the
holder in due course is on him, unless and until he proves that,
subsequent to the alleged fraud or illegality, value has in good faith
been given for the bill by some other holder in due course .

R.S., c. B-5, s. 58.




152. (1) Where a bill has been protested for non-payment, any person
may intervene and pay it under protest for the honour of any party
liable thereon or for the honour of the person for whose account the
bill is drawn.


If more than one offer

(2) Where two or more persons offer to pay a bill for the honour of
different parties, the person whose payment will discharge most
parties to the bill has the preference.


Refusal to receive payment

(3) Where the holder of a bill refuses to receive payment under
protest, he loses his right of recourse against any party who would
have been discharged by that payment . ( you read it here first, Wow
Eh?)


Entitled to bill

(4) The payer for honour, on paying to the holder the amount of the
bill and the notarial expenses incidental to its dishonour, is
entitled to receive both the bill itself and the protest.


Liability for refusing

(5) Where the holder does not on demand in a case described in
subsection (4) deliver up the bill and protest, he is liable to the
payer for honour in damages.

Can you intimidate or obstruct a man or woman with civil law from
doing God's business according to mans law the criminal code? Lets
see!




Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman

176. (1) Every one who

(a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or
endeavours to obstruct or prevent a clergyman or minister from
celebrating divine service or performing any other function in
connection with his calling , or(RonCarelli Vs Duplessis 1959)
SupremeCourtCanada
http://www.summitconnects.com/Articles_Col...s/200412_12.pdf
)

( knowing that a clergyman or minister is about to perform, is on
his way to perform or is returning from the performance of any of the
duties or functions mentioned in paragraph (a)

(i) assaults or offers any violence to him, or

(ii) arrests him on a civil process, or under the pretence of
executing a civil process ,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding two years.


Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings

(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of
persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent
purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.




(3) Every one who, at or near a meeting referred to in subsection (2),
wilfully does anything that disturbs the order or solemnity of the
meeting is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 172.



Idem






Intimidation


Common nuisance




Definition





423. (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an
offence punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without
lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to
abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do,
or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from
doing,

(a) uses violence or threats of violence to that person or his or her
spouse or common-law partner or children, or injures his or her
property ;

( intimidates or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of
that person by threats that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other
injury will be done to or punishment inflicted on him or her or a
relative of his or hers, or that the property of any of them will be
damaged;




Common nuisance

180. (1) Every one who commits a common nuisance and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety or health of the public, or

( causes physical injury to any person,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding two years.


Definition

(2) For the purposes of this section, every one commits a common
nuisance who does an unlawful act or fails to discharge a legal duty
and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety, health, property or comfort of the public;
or

( obstructs the public in the exercise or enjoyment of any right
that is common to all the subjects of Her Majesty in Canada.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 176.







http://www.reformed.org/documents/westminster_conf_of _faith.html#chap22

The law regarding lawful oaths that is still in force but not being
enforced,,,why???
CHAPTER XXII.
Of Lawful Oaths and Vows.

I. A lawful oath is a part of religious wors hip, wherein upon just
occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he
asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or
falsehood of what he sweareth.

II. The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and
therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore
to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to
swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet,
as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word
of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful
oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be
taken.

III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness
of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is
fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath
to any thing but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to
be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to
refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed
by lawful authority.

IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words,
without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin;
but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance,
although to a man's own hurt: nor is it to be violated, although made
to heretics or infidels.

V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be
made with the like religious care , and to be performed with the like
faithfulness.

VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone: and that
it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and
conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for
obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to
necessary duties, or to other things, so far and so long as they may
fitly conduce thereunto.

VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or
what would hinder any duty therein commanded, or which is not in his
own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or
ability from God. In which respects, monastical vows of perpetual
single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from
being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and
sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.

So you can follow the Advise of Ephesians 6:10-20 and Jesus at Matthew
18:15-20 and you will be almost there.

Blessings uppn watching my video...!


http://video.google.ca/videosearch?q=%22Tr...by+Deception%22

Holy Smokes owlmon,

What is it you are implying?

Shhhhh, wait a minute, I think I hear a little bird trying to tell me "I told you so!" Never mind what that is supposed to mean, it's just that it all makes sense now.

Where have you been as we tried to get conversation going here on the boards to discuss such matters?

What is this you speak of: "Fear and False info?" Please explain your self, or are you afraid of speaking to women?

There are many who visit here that are not learned in Christian/Hebrew Biblical dogmas and teachings. How is it you expect that many survivors of 500 years of Genocide and oppressive occupation, Blessed by the Holy Roman Christian Papa are going to embrace the words you say as Truth beyond a shadow of a doubt?

While we are on the subject, please humor me and ponder over the following that I want to share with you,

From the Codices of the Nag Hammadi Coptic Text as translated by Doresse

44 [39]. Jesus says: "The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge and hidden them: they have not entered, and neither have they permitted <entry> to those who wished to enter. But you, be prudent as serpents and simple as doves!"

---------------------------------------------------------
24 [21]. Mary says to Jesus: "Who are your disciples like?" He says to her: "They are like little children who have made their way into a field that does not belong to them. When the owners of the field come, they will say: 'Get out of our field!' They <then> will give up the field to these <people> and let them have their field back again."

--------------------------------------------------------
With Respect,
Prairyearth

Wow do women not read? I said someone has removed this which I posted here in April..

No innuendo just a observation...

False info is that based upon the school and law system of the white government..

Fear mongering is complaining and telling graphic stories but not providing a solution...Your people were raped and selectively culled from the land as of Talmud...that is a Jewish law book.....

Those who are the father of the lie rule the land with ignorance of Torah the first five books of the Bible Koran and the source of the power of the monarchy offering itself out front as if it invokes honor...

It is you who have the simple honor of pointing out their fraud...

I am not into convincing or begging anymore as a lot of false pride and arrogance prevents knowledge from being absorbed and one should not throw pearls before swine...I am not saying you are swine! You select the porkers...

So convince me you are not like the rest of those who are either too lazy or too angry to learn or respond with reluctance to read info..... sewn on your sleeve

If you want to learn the truth it will not be by me emailing you as you will have to work to get it....by going through the links as I have wasted to many hours on arrogant and foolish students to put out my valuable time to those who in vain ignorance wish to argue..

.BTW Women are to lead us out of this mess so I have faith that will transpire......are you the one? Men are to proud of their stupidity to get smart....

I am boasting to take on the false pride and arrogance so if you can prove just one tidbit I sent you is false I will submit myself in humble prostration to the fact I was wrong..

So are you up to the Challenge?

Dearest Brother owlmon,
It is apparent now that you truly do not know who I am, or who you are for that matter.

Thank you for sharing your side of the story. For my part I will discern and return and speak from my own opinion, for that is all I can do. I am but one voice in an ocean of humanity.

By the way, I would have no one prostrate themselves to me....I am not your God. I am but a humble messenger who's message has been ignored by most.
Prairy

hmmm adversarial.....Do I need to know you? You are a song....do I need to know the singer to hear the song?

Have you drank of the barrel of wisdom? Will you have success dealing with dead things....

Do you want freedom from oppression?

you will have to study if you want release as your lack of time in the correct area will leave you prone to deception as their is only one path away from Talmud..

I can already tell you have not taken the time to drink in the knowledge... question is what will you do with it once you do if you do....will it go out in the draught or will it nutrify the whole of the body ????

Brave and wise warriors realise they do not have to waste one arrow to defeat a fictional enemy....

Only the decieved sling arrows at the wind.....

Blessings

This Woman Has Stood With Us Solid From Day One: She Has Never Imposed Her Will: She Has Been A Faithful Messenger: She Has Never Complained: She Is Loved And Accepted As Equal, Something I Have Found Difficult To Find In Your Sharings.

You Have No Respect For This Woman, Myself Or Even Kaneekaneet? Correct?

There Is No Cure For The Genocide In Your Words Of ALIEN CORPORATE LAW Or Even That Which You Believe Is The Center Of The Harm To The World As The Talmutt.

Thus Again: If It Is Christainty That Opened The Doors Of Harm And Molestation Upon This Land: Is Also Responsible For Colusion With The SUBORDINATE OFFICER'S FOR THE USE AND ABUSE AND SLAUGHTER of 180,000 Of Our Children In Residential Schools' Then The Question Is: Why Should We Listen To Any Like You? I Find No Medicine In Words: Only That Which Created The Harm Our Collective Children Will Inherit.

I Have tried To Talk And Walk With You: To Share With You That We Are Only Servents To The Good And The Will Of Those Whom Have Charged Us To Keep These Words Alive And To Chase The FICTIONS Down Until They Surrender: We Are Not Here For Baseless Attacks.

Apologise Or Be Removed....The GhostChild.

So interesting to see assumptions go wild by ego pushing them..

I never said I had no respect for anyone...You want to put words in my mouth or practice your worn our failing argument skills?

Arguments are for fools agreements are for honorable men and women...

Since your associates have for generations been focusing on arguments what legacy are you painting for future generations?

The Treaty is an agreement with a dead in law corporate fiction....no wonder not much success has been obtained in that regard...Agreements with the dead have as much power as the grave can provide.

You could learn how to effect an living agreement but your ego and argument training don't like taking a back seat to a simple agreement you could use but have because of arrogance and some notion you are a genius reverted back to name calling anger and dealing with fictions rather than privately liable men and women like I already showed you.

I exposed you to this ,took my time and challenged my own freddom to visit you to share this phenomenally irrefutable truth with you and what have you done??

Nothing but inflated your own ego by puffing angry words eloquently written but not exposing the fiction nor explaining it to your people but instead want to argue about trivial fictional made up issues you try to create so you can use your arguing skills...It is an unconcious program you bought into as growing up in the white world....arguments are extremely profitable for the legal profession while agreements put them out of business....

I have no argument with Prairie flower...her bloom is welcome....

I do not need to know her to hear her song...

I can hear the fiction writing some of the words though and that is what needs alteration...yet you want to argue scream and yell at me??

I am the only one on this forum with the facts that lead to freedom and you want to argue!!!

Lets see who's in charge , your ego or the facts, quit looking at me and look at the facts...no ego allowed!

Blessings upon your ability to prove just one of those facts wrong!

Since you can't do that cut me some slack eh? I'm trying to work here.

Start getting agreements with private men who are liable for the fraud or admit you don't want the truth to be known as it takes away your shining canoe.

I Hold Up My Mirror: You Are All That You Accuse Me Of Being: You Must Learn To Be Humble:GENTLE AND RESPECTFUL.

I Still Stand Here, I Don't Give A Damn For ALIEN STAUATES: PROTOCOL: OR PROCEEDURES' OF THOSE WHOM CAN NOT CORRECT:NOR CREATE MUTUAL BENEFIT: I Will Not Support Harm Or ANYOTHER NEGATIVE.

My ShiningCanoe Floats Just Fine: Again: Apologize Minister: For Your Agressive Ways Are Not Those Of The Christ.

For All You Are Showing 'Man Of The Clothe': Is "Because You Say So" Not Because It Is So.

Prove To Me You Are A Higher Being: And Take Responsibility: If You Can Not: Then You Are No Better Then Those DEFACTOS' You Wish Corrected....The GhostChild.

Owlmon,
I have considered your words and your sharing for a considerable time now.

I have discussed in sincerity the question of my Ego (definition of said word; (psychoanalysis) the conscious mind) and arrogance (definition of said word; overbearing pride evidenced by a superior manner toward inferiors) and lastly the idea of myself being a Fear Monger, yes, I asked for honest evaluation about myself from my closest Elder advisers, Family, Friends and Comrades who personally know me and the song (messages) I bring to the public's attention.

All these peoples advised me that they did not see me as, hear me as, or feel I was being over bearing nor arrogant. Most advised me that some persons saw me in this way because I would not cave to their control, in other words, I Stand firmly on the grounds where I am.

This does not mean I know it all, as I am learning things each and everyday. What it does mean is, in what I have learned thus far, I know where to stand.

I can not be the Hero. I am no Mary Mother of Jesus, Saint Joan of Arc, and lastly, I can not lead people out of the wilderness and into Zion's Armageddon. And I do not move Gold.

Yes, woman is supposed to come forth in these times and help to restore order, mercy and peace to a world of chaos. But I don't see this as being one woman alone, but True Woman consciousness taking it's rightful place, side by side the men at their Councils once again. The woman consciousness having a voice and stopping the violence, stopping the rape and pillaging of our Mother Earth and kissing the boo boos of a war torn planet and making them all better again. All said and told, no one woman can do all that, it will take many women from many nations to join together in unity and tell the world, Stop it! Once and for all.

Lastly, there are no Arrows being slung to the wind from here, as I am not armed nor dangerous.
Prairyearth a Mother

So you take my generic application of the posters as only applicable to you?

No way as I keep saying I hear your song but what is making it different from hundreds of years of anger vs fraud....???

Anyways it's not about me, you, your or my pride or ego or lack of it it's about the knowledge to provide freedom .....so if you don't wan't it are to buzy arguing or complaining ...then delete it and I'll know and move on..

Sound good?

Blessings

There you are Owlmon. Well met. I find your lengthy post is a sincere effort to share what you believe or know to be source and solution to the errors this site is trying to understand and correct. But you did seem to be a bit rude when you wrote:

You seem to ignore all the facts that our leader has brought here in the course of the Ghostchild struggle. His facts and truths seem to be very similar to your facts and truths...except the part about the Talmud. You seem to be focused on the Talmud as the source of all the error and consequences of those errors.

I would like to share here my belief that the error begins back further than the Talmud. The error begins with the Lucifer Rebellion and the betrayal of Humanity by Prince Caligastia and his following...some five hundred thousand years ago, when Humanity was still young. The Talmud is just one of the continuations of the original error of rebellion against Creator and Creation by one who's ego got the best of him. I will say no more about this, unless asked to do so.

Ghostchild Movement's site has the characteristic of exploring the truth from as many angles as possible and it is inescapable that much that is not true, or less true, is touched upon and sorted through by our good hearts and minds.

I will read some of your presentations regarding the Talmud. I sense that much can be learned from doing so.

I suppose that many of the reports here of horrible things of inHumanity to man, could be seen as "fear mongering". I read them and feel fear and I believe this is true of any well intentioned Human Being. But I dont believe the intention is to cause harm through the dissimination of fear, but rather to inform us so that we can be forearmed about these negative truths.

Would you be kind enough Sir, to give a few specific examples of the "confusing false info" you have mentioned? This is important to me so that I can better see your mindset and Spirit in this matter.

I do thank you for the hard work you did, to bring all the sites and information here for our consideration. I will seek that which has value to me in them.

I will close this now. I wait for some positive response from you.

Respectfully Submitted, DAN 1 Honorary Ghostchild Elder

Thank you Dan for your reply.....I must admit that taking my words out of context by prairie thinking I was speaking of her points to the fact that folks don't read and Moon seems to think all those irrefutable facts I posted are of no use in his arguments with the dead.....I percieve they were not fully examined

I, as you observed ,have put Ten years of sincere dedicated research into those facts so as to create a picture folks can see..

The fear mongering I speak of is more of the same ol stories of abuse....more of the anger being generated by complaints and reports of how the white government is corrupt..

This is a failed process used by your people for hundreds of years with the evidense of the results. When someone arrives with a solution it is to overide the broken record of complaining and stand with power and knowledge in agreement...

Watch my Video of me at the end of the links for more info.

I am working with the Blackfoot Sovereign nation here in Alberta specificallt Duane Goodstriker and the reclaiming of land in the Centre of Edmonton as they desecrated an old burial site and Duane found out about it.

I am also helping Patrick Ellis whom Kaneekaneet and Moon are familiar with and he is very pleased with the info passed along....He took the time to read it figure it out ....

I have also met and Worked with Harvey White Hawk a Gustafsen Lake mesenger and Headman for the Coty Band in Kamsack saskatchewan. He introduced me to Elizabeth Rogers who sadly passed on last spring...she adopted me into the Pasqua tribe in Balcarras Sask as Spotted eagle....

I miss her as she was a wise Clan Mother who also was excited about the process...She had started a letter to the Queen in her private Capacity but I do't think she ever sent it....

They have had some sucess dealing with the dead but were plagerized for there rebuilding work lied to and now wish to exonerate their nation from any association with the dead in law fictions,,,,

you may email him at goodstriker@gmail.com for more info on me and the process he is exhilarated about.

Blessings and apologies for splashing so much water into Moons Canoe and causing Prarie to think my generic words applied to her...

My patience is thinning as time goes along it seems...

And thank you both for thinking.

I work with Moon and KaNeeKaNeet whom have a relative document circulating and long over due to the advancement and stabilization of humanity.

I also work with ThreeEagles, who has informed me it is my responsibility to inform the public of certain things, whether it is viewed as fear mongering or not. It is ThreeEagles who has taught me that these "religious" arguments do not belong in the solution and I agree. Original people didn't practice a religion, they lived it through their culture. If you don't know who ThreeEagles is, well then, that is not my problem.

It is with great honor that I present my next posting in Discussions then, now and again. May you not experience fear at all, any more forever, and ever.

Fear has no place at this Fire.
Prairyearth

how can you agree with what you do not even research? You have not gone through the links or you would have told Three Eagles he is wrong..

It is about exposing their fraud more than religion....but since you never reserached the links you think its all about religion....

It is about exposing the fraud of their religion and strategy....Three eagles must not know of the facts so he espousing opinion based upon your opinion unresearched,,,,

Sorry I have no respect for speculators to lazy to read and see the facts are irrefutable.....

Some just want to suffer even when a solution is given to them that the Canadian treasury board were briefed on and said it was flawless....but they were secular so could not deal with it..That was before I started private notices,,,,now their scared as the facts in private knowledge makes them privately liable for their misfeasance...

But no one is interested in that I guess as naysayers that don't read seem to rule here...why not try reading and researching all of what I posted before you express opinions so someone else can express some more opinions that are irrelavant.

See what I mean! a perfectly viable solution and you knock it before you even know what it is......


Sort of built in failure program it seems.....if that is not the case then how could you have ignored the powerful; irrefutable facts that being with a false religion in the Jewish Rabbi's eyes ,not mine, makes you a pagan slave to those who rule with Talmud..

If you fail to claim their fraud in an agreement they believe your inaction is consent...

Did you go to http://come-and-hear.com to read??

Only those willing to reach for knowledge will be able to grasp it..

Keep trying or you will fail..

Blessings upon your dedication to facts as opposed to fiction..

PS if your not going to read it and just knock what you know nothing about why not erease it....Maybe your ego will feel better then....

So you've insulted me by taking your opinion of what you did not read to an elder so you could get an uninformed opinion to return to me..

Real intelligent ....

You wonder why my patience is thin?

Please. Everyone forgive this less than genius man. Please do not take actions against one another. I believe this can be sorted out to the benefit of all. We can agree. But, please, I will need time to read the site and its information provided.

Perhaps all involved in this can tend to other important matters and check here later to see if this can be made better.

I will read and consider the information and come here and share my feelings and thoughts about the pertinence and validity of Owlmon's findings and conclusions regarding the Talmud's role in some of the problems that assail us today. I will look closely at the relationship between the use of the Talmud and the issues of conquest and sovereignty of the Land of the Eagle, The Land of the Condor and All the Lands In Between.

I respect everyone's opinion here and endeavor to understand why there is irritation between such beings of good heart and mind. Impatience is to be expected. We are only poorly evolved Humans. But I appeal to the best part of each and every one of you to control this weakness of impatience for the greater good.

Dear Owlmon. If Sister Prairyearth and our leader Okimow Wacon Ne Pa Ka Nee Pa Wit has not read your material, it is probably because they simply have not had the time to do so. I will take the time and report back. Maybe this will help.

I do intend to be fair to all and respectful in this effort.

I begin now to read. Thank you Owlmon for again placing the important website for our use in your recent posts.

I will be back as soon as I can with some idea and opinion about this matter.

Uh... I do not know yet the extent of what I am about to try and do...I do not know the size of the body of information that Owlmon presents. I may return with questions for him, to help expedite an intelligent conclusion to this effort.

Respectfully Submitted, DAN 1